View Full Version : who do the eagles target
at the end of the year the eagles need to look for a better more experiance defender who do they try to attract to perth give us your thoughts
bunsen burner
23 Jun 2004, 21:18
- Polak.
- Any KPP should be considered
- other than that, draft picks - KPPs.
franky_mojojo
23 Jun 2004, 21:45
i like us to get mooney. he's a bit of a nutcase(we are lacking in toughness), but can play forward and back and probably won't be too expensive.
Another player no-one has mentioned is Jason Saddington, who has been rumoured to be traded to carlton the last few years but nothing ever happened.
Hay and Gaspar have both been named as to wanting to come home, but they are both past their prime and probably won't offer much.
There are 2 defencive midfielders wanting to come home too, Carr and stenglein. Carr will probably go to freo, but Stenglein is very close to an eagles player and we will probably endup getting him. I really think he is a great player and will add another dimension to our midfield.
read my thread;)
I think it would help us condisderably and every player and club involved
coasting
23 Jun 2004, 21:46
Our two main targets are Brad Ottens and Nathan Thompson.
franky_mojojo
23 Jun 2004, 21:52
Originally posted by coasting
Our two main targets are Brad Ottens and Nathan Thompson.
what are you basing that on?
rickey - u are really really really gay in the head if u ask me. i've got the marbels - YEAH!!!!
i am new and im ok with that but youshould leave me and my friends alone because you are not a supported and it isn't nice so nick off
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
LOOK AT THE NEWBIE!!!!
coasting
23 Jun 2004, 22:23
Originally posted by franky_mojojo
what are you basing that on?
Dennis Cometti
no1bankteller
23 Jun 2004, 22:43
Originally posted by Casey
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
LOOK AT THE NEWBIE!!!!
So how does it feel to be a senior member...:D
Originally posted by no1bankteller
So how does it feel to be a senior member...:D
Pretty bloody good actually thanks for asking
coasting
24 Jun 2004, 00:55
http://www.zeke.com.au/forum_pics/look_newbie.jpg
bunsen burner
24 Jun 2004, 01:11
Originally posted by coasting
Our two main targets are Brad Ottens and Nathan Thompson. Wouldn't mind either of these two. Prefer Polak though.
eagleye
24 Jun 2004, 03:16
didn't know which thread to post in, so i posted in both.....
I would like to see us trade aggresivly but not for anyone over age 26. We have a young team and someone we get must be around when the rrest of the group start to become class players.
Personally i think the players at the top of our list should be :
Fevola - i really rate him. don't know how much Carlton would want for him but it was suggested that he would be traded. His a FF and young.
Stenglien - a relativly young defensive midfielder who wants to come to us.
Leigh Brown - Western Australian, KPP, Young, not hugely expensive
Clement - might be too old, not sure. But he is a good medium / small defender which we really need.
Polak - not if his too expensive but if he wasn't happy with a ontract freo are offering ( as has been suggested ) then we must offer something higher to try and force freo into trading him to us, or put him in the pre - season draft. He would be a great player to be rotated with Lynch and Gaspar ( when fit ) at CHB and CHF.
personally id love to get 1 Kpp and 1 defender / defensive midfilder. Preferably Fevola or Brown, and Stenglien.
coasting
24 Jun 2004, 09:11
Fev will never be traded now.
Stenglein is an outside chance.
Leigh Brown isn't West Australian and I don't think he is any better than some of the young talls we have here now.
Forget Clement.
Polak... The Dockers would force him into the preseason draft before they traded him to us.
Black Thunder
24 Jun 2004, 13:24
I've said a few guys before.
Matty Maguire (st k) is one guy i really rate. If he keeps going he will win an All Australian geurnsey eventually (and probably more than one).
Brendan Fevola. much maligned but can do a huge job. I think he'd enjoy the open spaces at Subi as well.
I really don't see the point of us trading unless we're gonna go after someone who is good now with even more potential upside. We're not a team which needs a few minor adjustements here and there. We're a team which just needs a top KP forward, and another KPP down back.
Originally posted by coasting
Our two main targets are Brad Ottens and Nathan Thompson.
Can't see that happening at all, unless we offload some of our part-time ruckmen.
11 players 6' 5" or bigger just doesn't fit into Woosha's gameplan.
Originally posted by coasting
http://www.zeke.com.au/forum_pics/look_newbie.jpg
i tried to get that picture but it wouldnt work - thanks for the tip
Targets:
1. Polak
2. McPharlin
3. Buddy Franklin?
4 - Ottens, Thompson anyone who can take a contested grab.
If getting a KPP with form on the board or great potential doesn't come through grab Stinger Stenglein from the Crows.
Draft smart.
Get butts into gear.
Improve.
Win x22 plus finals.
-- llosis's 1 year plan, 2005.
eagleye
26 Jun 2004, 01:03
Originally posted by coasting
Fev will never be traded now.
Stenglein is an outside chance.
Leigh Brown isn't West Australian and I don't think he is any better than some of the young talls we have here now.
Forget Clement.
Polak... The Dockers would force him into the preseason draft before they traded him to us.
well thats very negative....
im pretty sure Brown is Western Australian
bunsen burner
26 Jun 2004, 01:17
Originally posted by eagleye
im pretty sure Brown is Western Australian He's definitely Victorian.
Clayton
26 Jun 2004, 14:04
I don't think we should trade for Polak, because we already have a surplus of players in his mold Lynch, Gaspar, Johnson, McDougal etc.
It would have been nice to steal Bradshaw or Michael last yr when they were both nearly squeezed out.
bunsen burner
26 Jun 2004, 14:56
Originally posted by Clayton
I don't think we should trade for Polak, because we already have a surplus of players in his mold Lynch, Gaspar, Johnson, McDougal etc.
What drugs are you on?
- Those 4 players put together would not be worth the value of Polak
- Johnson looks like a dud
- Gaspar has injury problems
- McDougall has potential but is far from a sure thing. Also is mentally soft.
- Lynch is dumb and slow
Polak on the other hand can take a grab better than anyone in our team.
Clayton
26 Jun 2004, 14:58
Maybe someone the club should look at is Ian Perrie, he is out of favour at Adelaide atm & securing him in a trade wouldn't be that expensive. We know he can play both ends of the ground aswell.
After the first 20 secs of last nights legend game I have come to the conclusion that we should re-draft Peter Matera:D
Clayton
26 Jun 2004, 15:06
Originally posted by bunsen burner
What drugs are you on?
- Those 4 players put together would not be worth the value of Polak
- Johnson looks like a dud
- Gaspar has injury problems
- McDougall has potential but is far from a sure thing. Also is mentally soft.
- Lynch is dumb and slow
Polak on the other hand can take a grab better than anyone in our team.
Mate what do you think Freo is gonna want for him!
We've already got the players in those positions. I reckon we only need to fine tune the side
Originally posted by Clayton
Mate what do you think Freo is gonna want for him!
We've already got the players in those positions. I reckon we only need to fine tune the side
i think that you're over estimating the ability of our KPPs. sure we can fill the positions but we want to fill the positions with guys that can beat the opposition. of our KPPs (not including ruckmen) i would only back glass and gaspar to do the job and they haven't set the world on fire.
Originally posted by coasting
http://www.zeke.com.au/forum_pics/look_newbie.jpg
why the **** do you feel the need to have a go at guys just because they haven't been around the 6 months that you have?
at least have the good form not to steal the graphics from zekes site.
bunsen burner
26 Jun 2004, 18:55
Originally posted by Clayton
Mate what do you think Freo is gonna want for him! Got to pay if you want quality.
We've already got the players in those positions. I reckon we only need to fine tune the side You don't know much about football. A team that is 11th on the ladder needs a bit more than fine tuning. You also can't win a flag without a first rate spine. Polak is a much better chance of being a first rate KPP that any of the players we have.
Clayton
26 Jun 2004, 19:15
We've invested alot of time in McDougal & I think that he'll be better than Polhack. It may take a while for him to develop but it'll pay dividends in the future.
What makes you think Polak is better than him, sure he can take a mark but he can't put it on the scoreboard yet.
I'd back Lynch & Glass in their respective postions aswell.
Lets not forget that this side sat 2nd on the ladder this time last yr,
bunsen burner
26 Jun 2004, 19:28
Originally posted by Clayton
We've invested alot of time in McDougal & I think that he'll be better than Polhack. It may take a while for him to develop but it'll pay dividends in the future. You don't get it because you know little about football.
1. Polak can take a better grab that McDougall at the moment
2. Our spine at the moment is poor - although still developing. Glass is the only one who looks like a sure thing. Polak looks a better proposition atm to all our other KPPs
3. Why would we just sit and hope that all our KPPs turn into first rate KPPs? The chances of this are slim.
What makes you think Polak is better than him, sure he can take a mark but he can't put it on the scoreboard yet.Once again you demonstrate your lack of football knowledge. Polak hasn't put the results on the score board yet because he mostly plays defence. he's also a few years younger than McDougall and Lynch.
Lets not forget that this side sat 2nd on the ladder this time last yr, With jako at CHB and Haynes at FF. You don't know what you're talking about.
bunsen burner
26 Jun 2004, 19:30
Originally posted by Clayton
Polhack. I dare you to go to the Fremantle board and tell them Polak is a hack and that Quentin Lynch is better. Actually, why don't you go to the main board so everyone can see how much of a fool you are.
no1bankteller
26 Jun 2004, 19:34
Originally posted by bunsen burner
I dare you to go to the Fremantle board and tell them Polak is a hack and that Quentin Lynch is better. Actually, why don't you go to the main board so everyone can see how much of a fool you are.
Polak is a good player but I know who I would rather have as my forward if the only two choices are Polack and McDougal and its not Polak.
In the backline Polak is a rare talent, but a bit like Jako he does tend to struggle when thrusted forward.
As far as a comparison between Polak and Lynch is concered Polak is more athletic and a better mark, however Lynch is a better kick and is a great deal meaner. Personally I would love to see them both on our half backline...
Clayton
26 Jun 2004, 19:34
you W@nker where did I say that polak is better than Lynch.
I simply said that i was prepared to back him & Glass in defence.
Simply put Freo won't want to part with him anyway.
Black JuJu
26 Jun 2004, 19:44
Yeah, 'Polhack' just makes you look like a troll.
You know your footy bunsen but seem to completely lack patience. The current crop has barely played together, I think they deserve a little more time, all have shown something in their positons and all of them have been thrown in the deep end.
Polak is obviously talented, he's touted as one of the leagues most talented youngsters but I'd question exactly how much of this hype is based on performance. The lad struggled when given a role up forward and has not been given a set role in the team (ie like Lynch as a CHB, McDougall at FF etc) due to Freo having guys like Hadrill and McPharlin. I'm yet to be convinced he can hold down a key position week in week out and if he was to come to the Eagles (which he won't) he'd bring the 'how will he cope with the extra responsibilty?' tag. Don't get me wrong, very talented, a great mark, but there are question marks at this point. Seen as how your in somewhat of a hurry bunsen, are you very confident that Polak can be drafted in and become our best tall and hold down a key position consistently in 2005? Wouldn't anything else just be waiting for youngsters again?
bunsen burner
26 Jun 2004, 19:52
Originally posted by no1bankteller
Polak is a good player but I know who I would rather have as my forward if the only two choices are Polack and McDougal and its not Polak. I'm not the one who is alluding to this being the only choice. Go read Clayton's posts.
In the backline Polak is a rare talent, but a bit like Jako he does tend to struggle when thrusted forward. And that's why I think we should trade agressively for him - to put him at CHB. I reiterate - I have never suggested he play forward.
bunsen burner
26 Jun 2004, 19:57
Originally posted by Clayton
you W@nker where did I say that polak is better than Lynch.
I simply said that i was prepared to back him & Glass in defence.
- I suggest we go after Polak for a KPP.
- You say the positions are already taken
- You call Polak a hack
- You say you back Glass at CHB
- If you knew anything about football, you'd know Polak's best position (from what we've seen of Fremantle) is CHB.
- You say you'd back Lynch at CHB.
You didn't say in directly, but you implied that you think Lynch is the better option. W@nker.
Simply put Freo won't want to part with him anyway. probably not, but getting him isn't impossible.
bunsen burner
26 Jun 2004, 20:14
Originally posted by Black JuJu
You know your footy bunsen but seem to completely lack patience. The current crop has barely played together, I think they deserve a little more time, all have shown something in their positons and all of them have been thrown in the deep end.I wouldn't call it impatient. I'm reasonably happy with the KPP development atm. BUT, you have to consider that we need to build a team that can win a flag. To win a flag you need a strong spine (ie Lynch, Brown, Leppitsch, Michael). Just sitting back and putting all our eggs with our current spine/basket when a player like Polak (4th pick in the best draft in history) might become available is pure stupidity.
Seen as how your in somewhat of a hurry bunsen, are you very confident that Polak can be drafted in and become our best tall and hold down a key position consistently in 2005? As confident as you can get. Lynch currently holds down CHB and I'll eat my hat if Polak couldn't do it better short and long term.
As for hurry? No spine = no flag. Can't be anymore simple. The midfield group are mostly early 20s, but we would need to find afirst class spine before Cousins is 28, not to mention before Judd may take off. If the spine we have doesn't develop into a first rate spine within 2-3 years, we risk missing a golden opportunity.
Going to draft will mean a good KPP will be 3 years behind Polak. Considering Polak was 4th pick in what is considered to be the best draft in history, we would be crazy not to have a crack.
The opportunity (however slight) of being able to obtain a 20 year old KPP who has indicated he will play 10 years of footy doesn't come by often. If you don't hurry, you don't get.
Clayton
27 Jun 2004, 00:02
When I said i'd back Glass I was eluding to the fact that he & Lynch were playing some good footy in their respective positions.
Look man it's pointless to carry on this argument. I'll concede that Polak has more talent than Lynch. I just think that the KPP's we have at the club will do the job for us & Polak might be an expensive trade. If we can get him for a steal I'll take it:D
Mark Viduka
27 Jun 2004, 02:42
Originally posted by Clayton
When I said i'd back Glass I was eluding to the fact that he & Lynch were playing some good footy in their respective positions.
Look man it's pointless to carry on this argument. I'll concede that Polak has more talent than Lynch. I just think that the KPP's we have at the club will do the job for us & Polak might be an expensive trade. If we can get him for a steal I'll take it:D
Exactly. I don't know why people say "Do whatever to get this player" Like Fremantle are going to give him up anyway and if they are they are going to want well and above what he is worth.
It would be like Essendon saying "We want Chris Judd... go get him" well the Eagles aren't going to give him up are they.... unless Essendon gave up Matthew Lloyd and a couple of others... and I doubt Essendon fans are going to want that.... so I cant see Eagles supporters wanting us to get rid of 2 or 3 of our best players just to get Polak.
It's not going to happen. We will not get Polak so don't even bother trying.
bunsen burner
27 Jun 2004, 10:56
Originally posted by Mark Viduka
We will not get Polak so don't even bother trying. That's a ridiculous attitude. My gut feeling is that his manager is just playing the negotiation game and he'll stay at fremantle, but it's not impossible. If the Eagles make a good wage offer to Polak and he wants to leave, we could get him for an expensive but worhwhile price.
Unwritten_Law
27 Jun 2004, 13:29
Originally posted by franky_mojojo
i like us to get mooney. he's a bit of a nutcase(we are lacking in toughness), but can play forward and back and probably won't be too expensive.
Depends what you expect to pay for a player leading (or very close to) a current top 8 side's B+F. Last year you could have got him for sfa but good luck now.
Unwritten_Law
27 Jun 2004, 13:34
I noticed a mention of Haynes, would you say that you guys have missed him much?
Along with Mackie he has improved our forward line. He is never going to be a worldbeater but is dangerous as a 3rd-4th target.
Mark Viduka
27 Jun 2004, 14:05
Originally posted by Unwritten_Law
I noticed a mention of Haynes, would you say that you guys have missed him much?
Along with Mackie he has improved our forward line. He is never going to be a worldbeater but is dangerous as a 3rd-4th target.
No. I didn't have a high regard of Haynes when he was here... and even more-so now. Possibly one of the worst kicks for goal in the AFL. I'm a lot happier having Andrew McDougall at Full Forward. McDougalls only played 20 odd games and has shown more than Haynes who had 50 games with us and wasn't up to it.
We got Pick 20 for David Haynes... which allowed us to get Sam Butler... and he's looked very exciting... so I am ecstatic with the trade.
bunsen burner
27 Jun 2004, 14:13
Originally posted by Unwritten_Law
I noticed a mention of Haynes, would you say that you guys have missed him much?
No. We're better off going backwards while mcDougall develops in order to go forward. Haynes was never really a long term FF option.
Unwritten_Law
27 Jun 2004, 18:33
Originally posted by Mark Viduka
We got Pick 20 for David Haynes... which allowed us to get Sam Butler... and he's looked very exciting... so I am ecstatic with the trade.
Fair enough.
We got pick 20 off the doggies for Street so we are pretty happy as well. Throw in Matthew Spencer (pick 42) and it would have to be a win-win trade.
Fall Out Boy
28 Jun 2004, 21:19
Originally posted by franky_mojojo
i like us to get mooney. he's a bit of a nutcase(we are lacking in toughness), but can play forward and back and probably won't be too expensive.
Mooney hasn't had a suspension for a good deal of time. Oh and he wouldn't come as cheaply as you'd think. The last year of his contract (albeit backended) is worth plenty.
Mark Viduka
28 Jun 2004, 23:53
Originally posted by phatandphreaky
Mooney hasn't had a suspension for a good deal of time. Oh and he wouldn't come as cheaply as you'd think. The last year of his contract (albeit backended) is worth plenty.
For 1 club to have to pay the the back end of his contract yes... its alot.... but it could be the same as the Croad situation... where Geelong are happy to trade him and pay only 1/4 of his salary rather than be stuck with him and pay the full amount.