PDA

View Full Version : Ching vs Kangaroos


Aquamarinejewel
22 Aug 2004, 22:10
Hmmm, I thought we were missing something lol, the ching for this week. :)

5. West
4. Cooney
3. Gilbee
2. Johnson
1. Croft ( he deserves it )

3. Cooney
2. Cross
1. B Murphy

doggies40
22 Aug 2004, 22:21
5- Puck Puck
4- Birssyboy
3- The sexy man himself crofty
2- Gilbs
1- Westy

PUPS

3- Puck Puck
2- Birssyboy
1- Little murph

Fossie 32
22 Aug 2004, 22:32
5 Crofty! clapclapclap Crofty! clapclapclap Crofty!

4 Garlick - two excellent goals and helped set up another

3 Cooney - excellent effort, ran himself into the ground. Disposal getting better - a bit better placement of passes could have set up Johnno for a couple more goals.
2 Johnno
1 Westy

Aplogies to the Age for leaving out Murphy :rolleyes:

3 Cooney
2 Birss
1 Cross

Gilbee9
22 Aug 2004, 22:38
5. Puk Puk
4. West
3. Crofty
2. Gilbo
1. Birss

BulldogMike
23 Aug 2004, 00:16
5 Cooney
4 Crofty
3 Eagle
2 Westy
1 Birss

Johnno was outstanding just missing out.

3 Cooney
2 Birss
1 Gilbee

stmookeyj
23 Aug 2004, 04:55
5. Cooney
4. Croft
3. West
2. Birss
1. Gilbee

SCRAY72
23 Aug 2004, 12:15
5. Cooney
4. Gillbee
3. West
2. Birss
1. Croft

3. Cooney
2. Cross
1. B.Murphy

Dog Town
23 Aug 2004, 13:06
5-Cooney
4-Westy
3-Birss
2-Gilbee
1-Johnson

angry steve
23 Aug 2004, 13:25
1.the coondog
2.Birss
3.Westy
4.Croft
5.Gilbee




1.Cooney
2.Cross
3.B.Murphy

angry steve
23 Aug 2004, 13:26
yep, those numbers are the wrong way around - nice one. :o

scooter600x
23 Aug 2004, 22:30
Can I just point out Daniel Cross had 18 possessions while tagging Shannon Grant who had just 12.

NorthBhoy
23 Aug 2004, 22:48
Can I just point out Daniel Cross had 18 possessions while tagging Shannon Grant who had just 12.

He played well.

An even better effort considering he was the only one of the pair with the added burden of carrying testicals around the field.

Fossie 32
23 Aug 2004, 22:55
Can I just point out Daniel Cross had 18 possessions while tagging Shannon Grant who had just 12.

So what are your votes, Esteemed One?

:)

Fossie 32
23 Aug 2004, 22:58
He played well.

An even better effort considering he was the only one of the pair with the added burden of carrying testicals around the field.

:D

Don't worry, you guys will come back OK. I'm suprised North supporters are saying we play with more heart than you - maybe this week and in a few other games but it seems it has been a major deficiency with us the last couple of years.

Rocco Jones
24 Aug 2004, 00:12
5- Cooney
4- Westy
3- Birss
2- Johnson
1- Croft

Pups
3- Cooney
2- Birss
1- Cross

scooter600x
24 Aug 2004, 00:21
So what are your votes, Esteemed One?

:)
If I give Crossy 5 will you think I'm biased?

5 Cooney
4 West
3 Cross
2 Robbins
1 Johnson

Apologies to Birss, Croft & Gilbee


3 Cooney
2 Cross
1 Birss

NorthBhoy
24 Aug 2004, 00:25
:D

Don't worry, you guys will come back OK. I'm suprised North supporters are saying we play with more heart than you - maybe this week and in a few other games but it seems it has been a major deficiency with us the last couple of years.

It was a shock.

No offence, but two losses to you blokes, Carlton and Adelaide have cost us big time, all because we didn't have the brain capacity or mental strength to realise we are not good enough to cruise through football games and expect results.

It is a good thing that such results cause uproar.

When efforts like that don't envoke anger amongst everyone involved, you may as well give it away. It is a product of success, and I suppose it is a good thing.

The_Flying_Egg
24 Aug 2004, 00:30
5. Cooneyman (my god he looks good)
4. Crofty :):) (he's a God)
3. Gilbinator (he's on fire :))
2. Birss (also on fire)
1. West (always on fire)

youngens
3. Cooneyman
2. Birss
1. Cross

mighty_west
24 Aug 2004, 00:34
It was a shock.

No offence, but two losses to you blokes, Carlton and Adelaide have cost us big time, all because we didn't have the brain capacity or mental strength to realise we are not good enough to cruise through football games and expect results.

It is a good thing that such results cause uproar.

When efforts like that don't envoke anger amongst everyone involved, you may as well give it away. It is a product of success, and I suppose it is a good thing.

It's called RESPECT, St. Kilda also found out about that in round 12.

Dog Town
24 Aug 2004, 08:36
Can I just point out Daniel Cross had 18 possessions while tagging Shannon Grant who had just 12.Just unlucky this week that guys like Gilbee and Birss were so damaging when they had the ball.Couldn't squeeze him in.

Fossie 32
24 Aug 2004, 20:17
If I give Crossy 5 will you think I'm biased?



No room for sentiment here Scooter.

;)