View Full Version : Ottens for Tarrant
guess_who
27 Aug 2004, 18:36
Hey guys, just wondering if you would be prepared to trade Tarrant for ottens? Not saying it will or won't happen just wondering if you thinkt the trade will suit either club and weather or not you would think it is a adequate trade?
If it were up to me I'd take that deal.
tiger of old
27 Aug 2004, 18:53
Thanks but no thanks.we can do better.
cheers!
guess_who
27 Aug 2004, 19:25
Thanks but no thanks.we can do better.
cheers!
Yeah, i agree Ottens is worth more then Tarrant but it would be awfully tempting if collingwood were to say they are willing to do that deal. Knowing Collingwood they will offer one or two duds and a draft pick or two and expect to have him wrapped up.
TheFoxhat
27 Aug 2004, 19:32
No Way ... *** ******...**** off..... :p :mad: :p
GhostofJimJess
27 Aug 2004, 19:52
No way.
Maybe Josh Fraser, but not Tarrant.
In fact, the red flags should go up if the name Tarrant is even bandied around come trade time. It would almost be a straight out admission by Malthouse that he was unable to get Tazza's mind right.
guess_who
27 Aug 2004, 20:02
No way.
Maybe Josh Fraser, but not Tarrant.
In fact, the red flags should go up if the name Tarrant is even bandied around come trade time. It would almost be a straight out admission by Malthouse that he was unable to get Tazza's mind right.
Tarrant is a full forward who can't kick goals. Ottens is a gun Ruckman! From a Collingwood point of view, Ottens for Tarrant any day.
wrennyboy
27 Aug 2004, 21:26
Would only do Ottens for Tarrent+Richards.
That gives us a CHF and a young ruckman.
richo FF
Tarrent CHF
fit coughlan in the centre
Schultz CHB
could see some results next year
I just cant get over all you richmond supporters rating Ottens so highly
It is the reason we have been so ordinary for the last 20 years .
I say done deal .
Rodgerramjet
27 Aug 2004, 23:24
No way.
Maybe Josh Fraser, but not Tarrant.
In fact, the red flags should go up if the name Tarrant is even bandied around come trade time. It would almost be a straight out admission by Malthouse that he was unable to get Tazza's mind right.
Correct, we DONT want tarrant for those reasons ghost has alluded to. Tarrant would be a lose cannon out of the clutches of Malthouse and McGuire, they're the only two keeping him on the straight and narrow.
Now Josh Fraser, I would definetly consider.
Bojangles17
27 Aug 2004, 23:44
Hey guys, just wondering if you would be prepared to trade Tarrant for ottens? Not saying it will or won't happen just wondering if you thinkt the trade will suit either club and weather or not you would think it is a adequate trade?
tarrent and your first r pick and we have a deal
Well, we all know Tarrant is eager get away from Collingwood since the Tania Buckley incident, so why give them Ottens? Hand over Pettifer for him ....
;)
tigermania
28 Aug 2004, 11:06
Is Collingwood relocating to South Australia?
:confused: :confused:
Deuf Hart
28 Aug 2004, 12:11
Let's see, a KP forward who misses gettable goals at important stages of a game.
No thanks. Already got one.
Brad-clare
28 Aug 2004, 19:25
Well, we all know Tarrant is eager get away from Collingwood since the Tania Buckley incident, so why give them Ottens? Hand over Pettifer for him ....
;)
What incident would this be??
rfctigerarmy
28 Aug 2004, 19:29
What incident would this be??
That injury one. Where Buckley and Tarrant dont want to play in the same side together.
Totally bull********. Ingore.
Tarrant wont leave Collingwood.
GhostofJimJess
28 Aug 2004, 23:01
keep Otto
Highly preferable option.
Bojangles17
28 Aug 2004, 23:26
keep Otto
my guess is that the answer to all of this will unfold very quickly one way or the other