View Full Version : graham your vote
tigerboyz
17 Nov 2004, 22:16
there's been a lot talk about wether we should pick up graham as a late pick
in the national draft.so i thought why not vote on it and have your two bobs
worth too.
Darth_Tiger
17 Nov 2004, 22:36
its up to plough and greg. if they want him i'm happy.
tigerboyz
17 Nov 2004, 22:42
its up to plough and greg. if they want him i'm happy.i'm not because of his age,i just see no value in recruiting him
unless we pick up franklin or roughead and he takes them under his wing.
corporal
18 Nov 2004, 13:47
its up to plough and greg. if they want him i'm happy.
You mean these poll results don't actual decide who we recruit?!?!
cairo tiger
18 Nov 2004, 15:08
agree with darth, they have the plan lets support them
Darth_Tiger
18 Nov 2004, 16:08
You mean these poll results don't actual decide who we recruit?!?!
lol
heartbroken
18 Nov 2004, 16:09
He showed decent form this year. We need to bolster our defence even if it is a 1 year bandade....just in case Gas has another shocker. It will also give Shulz an experienced defender to learn from.
As far as I am concerned, if we use our final pick on him, he is a "no risk" selection
You 9 so far who voted yes surely can't be serious.
What the hell do we want a 31 year old whose been delisted from a team on par with us?
We already have a slow guy who can play tallish.Kellaway.Why do we need another?
This is an atrocious move,aren't we supposed to be rebuilding?He's taking up a young kids spot we could be developing at Coburg.
Graham will keep Archibald from playing games.Are we trying to unearth young talent or aren't we?
If Terry wants I can give him the names of at least 1/2 a dozen 17 and 18 year olds that can play as a tallish half back flanker that'll still be available late in the draft.
Pathetic decision.I can't believe you're supporting this cxairo Tiger.Were't you one of the ones who was forever bleating about Flemming,Fletcher and Marsh?
Graham is the same.He's washed up!Why do you think the 2nd bottom side delisted him!
Agree evo.
Graham may be a no risk player but he is also a no gain player.
We would be much better off using a late pick in the draft to grab a specualtive kid even if it is a remote chance that he could turn out to be something. Graham won't turn out to be anything, and its not like he was anything better than average in his prime anyway. He wouldn't even have valuable knowledge to pass on to the youngsters.
kretchy
18 Nov 2004, 18:29
I always had respect for Mark Graham as a player, but I can't see the point of picking up a 31 year old who in reality now isn't anything more than a battler. I realise we are going to pick up a couple of recycled players for financial reasons, but for once it would be nice to get the right ones.
if we sumhow do select him, i hope he gives it all he has got and i hope we only sign him for one year....if not im spewing!