View Full Version : ING Cup: Victoria v New South Wales @ Junction Oval
Russian
20 Nov 2004, 14:48
Tomorrow
*Cameron White, +Adam Crosthwaite, Gerard Denton, Matthew Elliott, Brad Hodge, David Hussey, Brad Knowles, Michael Lewis, Andrew McDonald, Jonathan Moss, Graeme Rummans, Tim Welsford
*Simon Katich, Nathan Bracken, Shawn Bradstreet, Stuart Clark, +Brad Haddin, Phil Jaques, Jason Krejza, Brett Lee, Stuart MacGill, Aaron O’Brien, Matthew Phelps and Dominic Thornely
Had to go to bushrangers.com.au to get the NSW side :confused:
Vics Back to Back
20 Nov 2004, 20:30
Well no weather to screw us tomorrow so hopefully we can secure the BP and make our last ditch effort to make the final
5 Predictions
Elliott 100 runs
Crosthwaite 4 dismissals
Lee 70+ off 10 overs
Lewis 3 wickets
Ill take a catch in the crowd yet no money cos ch9 are showing the test :(
Should be a good game for Victorian fans and hope to see a big crowd down there.
Ill take a catch in the crowd yet no money cos ch9 are showing the test :(
Its less money, only 100 bucks for the first member, not 300.
Vics Back to Back
20 Nov 2004, 20:34
So I can still win money? Wooooooooooo. But the trump player probably wont exist will they?
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:35
Well no weather to screw us tomorrow so hopefully we can secure the BP and make our last ditch effort to make the final
I hope NSW win and get the Bonus Point just to shove that carrot further up the ar$ses of you arrogant Victorians.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:36
Its less money, only 100 bucks for the first member, not 300.
How can it be less money if Vics Back To Back said he will take a catch but it is worth no money cause Ch 9 are at the Test?
Vics Back to Back
20 Nov 2004, 20:36
NSW Win? Plus a BP? That is impossible
I would like to thank the NSW selectors for dropping their best bowler for the least economical bowler in the country
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:37
NSW Win? Plus a BP? That is impossible
Yeah... I know, but still.
I would like to thank the NSW selectors for dropping their best bowler for the least economical bowler in the country
Isn't Nicholson playing, as is Lee playing?
How can it be less money if Vics Back To Back said he will take a catch but it is worth no money cause Ch 9 are at the Test?
Its worth less money if its not on T.V i think. Because warriors home games are never shown, yet we still have chances of winning money.
Vics Back to Back
20 Nov 2004, 20:38
Yeah, they dropped Nicholson for Lee
Vics Back to Back
20 Nov 2004, 20:39
I think Silky was trying to make fun of your wording
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:40
Its worth less money if its not on T.V i think. Because warriors home games are never shown, yet we still have chances of winning money.
It is worth $100 for non-televised games.
But he said it is worth nothing, and you said it was worth less! :confused:
I think Silky was trying to make fun of your wording
I think silky should go get ********ed! :p
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:40
I think Silky was trying to make fun of your wording
Indeed I was :) ;)
It is worth $100 for non-televised games.
But he said it is worth nothing, and you said it was worth less! :confused:
lol. stop being an idiot ;) You knew what i meant.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:41
I think silky should go get ********ed! :p
I'll just insert the word approriate where them ***'s are.
I think silky should go get chocolated! :p
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:42
lol. stop being an idiot ;) You knew what i meant.
Or did I? :cool: :D
I'll just insert the word approriate where them ***'s are.
Your one crazy person ;)
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:43
Yeah, they dropped Nicholson for Lee
Understandable in a way, because they want Lee to get some match practice. But hmmmm... interesting omission but I suppose someone had to go.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:43
Your one crazy person ;)
I'm just thinking outside the square. Or is that inside the square? Or inside the rectangle? :confused: :cool:
So I can still win money? Wooooooooooo. But the trump player probably wont exist will they?
No they don't.
Vics Back to Back
20 Nov 2004, 20:45
I would have though Nicholson would be a better choice than Clark, or Bracken especially as MN is their most economical bowler and most lethal IMO
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:47
No they don't.
Why don't they just make it worth the same for non-televised games as they do for televised games.
It wouldn't be fair if you caught a six off a usual trump player in a non-tv game and got $100, but someone else catches a six off a trump player and gets $1000. Doesn't seem fair to the crowd.
I am still ********ed off for missing my chance of catching a six off Darren Lehmann last season at the Adelaide Oval. He was the trump that night, when you got $1000 for non-tv games.
I'm just thinking outside the square. Or is that inside the square? Or inside the rectangle? :confused: :cool:
Your more of a triangle, or maybe a rhombus.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:47
I would have thought Nicholson would be a better choice than Clark, or Bracken especially as MN is their most economical bowler and most lethal IMO
I would take Clark out and leave Nicholson in.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:48
Your more of a triangle, or maybe a rhombus.
Or a sphere?
Why don't they just make it worth the same for non-televised games as they do for televised games.
The announcer used to tell us who the trump player was, now he don't say it. So i assume they dont have one.
Or a sphere?
dodecahedron!
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:50
The announcer used to tell us who the trump player was, now he don't say it. So i assume they dont have one.
Why don't they just make every player the trump player? Usually the trump player is the ONLY one who doesn't hit a six.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:50
dodecahedron!
What the hell is that?
Vics Back to Back
20 Nov 2004, 20:51
Hodge is the trump for Victoria some games, it should always be the Freak
What the hell is that?
12 sided shape.
Why don't they just make every player the trump player? Usually the trump player is the ONLY one who doesn't hit a six.
Symonds hit a few sixes, im sure he woulda been the trump.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:55
Hodge is the trump for Victoria some games, it should always be the Freak
When was the last time Ian Harvey actually hit a six?
Vics Back to Back
20 Nov 2004, 20:56
The last match he played
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:57
Symonds hit a few sixes, im sure he woulda been the trump.
He's about the only one.
SA usually make Davison and Higgs the trumps for SA (switch every game)... but Davison only hit about 3-4 sixes last season and Higgs... I don't think he hit any.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:57
12 sided shape.
Bloody hell that is a big shape. :eek:
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 20:58
The last match he played
Symonds hit three sixes last night in Perth, and I think two of them were caught by members in the crowd.
Bloody hell that is a big shape. :eek:
not really u idiot :rolleyes: :p
Symonds hit three sixes last night in Perth, and I think two of them were caught by members in the crowd.
one was.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 21:05
not really u idiot :rolleyes: :p
12 sides is... damn n00b :p
Freo Big Fella
20 Nov 2004, 21:15
Symonds hit three sixes last night in Perth, and I think two of them were caught by members in the crowd.
The other one sconed this poor shiela :( .Not fun. Symmo ran across to check on her though.
The other one sconed this poor shiela :( .Not fun. Symmo ran across to check on her though.
Yeah i saw that, i was like a couple of sectoins away. The kid was more worried about if she caught it.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 21:18
The other one sconed this poor shiela :( .Not fun. Symmo ran across to check on her though.
Was there any blood?
Did Symonds go appologise or see if she was right or something?
Was there any blood?
Did Symonds go appologise or see if she was right or something?
It hit her in the stomach, no blood. Originally symonds held his hand up as the sorry sign. Then at the end of the over he ran up 15 metres away from the rope and asked if she was okay.
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 21:34
It hit her in the stomach, no blood. Originally symonds held his hand up as the sorry sign. Then at the end of the over he ran up 15 metres away from the rope and asked if she was okay.
Did she cry?
silky-smooth
20 Nov 2004, 21:45
No.
So it just hurt really bad?
I've been hit in the cheek while Bowling. It hurt, and left a bruise. Batsmen just came down and said if I was fine and I got up and bowled again.
Ahhh... cricket, the sport of forgiveness.
So it just hurt really bad?
I've been hit in the cheek while Bowling. It hurt, and left a bruise. Batsmen just came down and said if I was fine and I got up and bowled again.
Ahhh... cricket, the sport of forgiveness.
When i used to bowl medium/fast deliveries, i hit this kid in the box. Just like Wates or Dorey did last night.
This thread has an impressive number of posts for a match that hasn't even started yet.
Unwritten_Law
21 Nov 2004, 08:08
Bloody oath!
I thought the game must have been yesterday.
I want my two minutes back!
Russian
21 Nov 2004, 08:26
Victoria are batting first, Elliot and Moss opening the batting, Lee and Bracken the bowling. Welsford carrying the drinks for Victoria
0/8 after 5 overs
silky-smooth
21 Nov 2004, 08:40
Slow start for Victoria...
0/24 after 9 overs
Run Rate: 2.67
Matthew Elliott 11 off 25 balls
Jon Moss 12 off 29 balls
Brett Lee 0/14 off 5 overs
Nathan Bracken 0/10 off 4 overs
silky-smooth
21 Nov 2004, 09:24
VIC 0/79 (19 overs)
Moss 49* Elliott 27*
silky-smooth
21 Nov 2004, 09:33
Matthew Elliott run out for 27.
Brad Hodge then caught for a 4th-ball duck
Victoria 2/83
Hussey 3*, Moss 49*
the_big_sav
21 Nov 2004, 09:33
what are the bowling figures?
silky-smooth
21 Nov 2004, 09:37
Bracken 5-1-20-0 (1wd)
Lee 6-1-17-0
Clark 5-0-17-0 (1wd)
Bradstreet 3-0-23-0
MacGill 3-0-6-1
silky-smooth
21 Nov 2004, 10:21
2/144 after 35 overs
dr nick
21 Nov 2004, 10:47
This thread has an impressive number of posts for a match that hasn't even started yet.
LOL - i was reading through all the pages thinking when's there gonna be a score??
Victoria 5/232 in the 48th over.
Rummans 50*, McDonald 0*.
White the last batsman out for 3.
Moss scored 74 and Hussey 67.
Russian
21 Nov 2004, 11:23
5/238 with an over to go
Moss 74 (106)
Hussey 67 (80)
Rummans 53* (46)
MacGill 2/52 (9)
Lee 0/38 (10)
Russian
21 Nov 2004, 11:27
5/245 from the 50. Bracken 1/44 from 10. Rummans unbeaten 54 from 47
mcphee_is_a_gun
21 Nov 2004, 11:35
not a bad total should be able to defend that score....
dr nick
21 Nov 2004, 12:27
5/238 with an over to go
Moss 74 (106)
Hussey 67 (80)
Rummans 53* (46)
MacGill 2/52 (9)
Lee 0/38 (10)
Sheesh.. when's a Victorian gonna get some runs?
year of the roo
21 Nov 2004, 12:32
Pretty good effort from the Vics considering Hodge, Elliott and White all failed. Probably should have got more runs with so many wickets in hand and plenty of batting to come. The target is defendable, but we will need early wickets.
Vics Back to Back
21 Nov 2004, 12:55
Defendable? Ha, we only need 1 wicket and its all over for NSW
Vics Back to Back
21 Nov 2004, 13:02
From Cricket.com.au
B.Knowles 5.1 0 19 0 1 (0nb)
G.Denton 4.4 0 17 0 2 (0nb)
M.Lewis 1.2 0 5 0 0 (0nb)
So is Denton injured? Lewis injured? Or CA ********ed up
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 13:19
Its look like M.Lewis, ********ING BULL********. He better be back for the 4 day match
No score updates untill its worth giving
red+black
21 Nov 2004, 13:32
not a bad total should be able to defend that score....Just like we should be able to chase 108 with ease. But didn't.
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 13:41
But the 108 changed mid innings and it changed the whole innings suddenly. If we began the innings needing 108 off 19 overs we would have done it just as we would have made 123 of 24 if Ch9 didnt get in our way
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 13:52
M.Lewis out with a groin strain. Harwood should come in if fit for the 4-day game. How great it is to have great depth in bowling stocks though depth doesnt help you in the middle of a match
1 wicket away from Victory, c'mon Vics
red+black
21 Nov 2004, 14:06
But the 108 changed mid innings and it changed the whole innings suddenly. If we began the innings needing 108 off 19 overs we would have done it just as we would have made 123 of 24 if Ch9 didnt get in our way
When we needed 12 off 12 with 9 wickets in hand, there's no excuse.
Vic supporters have gone a bit quiet....
1 wicket for victory?
At 0/128 its looking like a massacre....
Lets hear the morons here defend their world beating side this time..
1/164
Katich 84*
Jaques 70
Theres the wicket....i guess the Vics are home?
the_big_sav
21 Nov 2004, 14:41
long bloody drinks break!
year of the roo
21 Nov 2004, 14:41
Vic supporters have gone a bit quiet....
1 wicket for victory?
At 0/128 its looking like a massacre....
Lets hear the morons here defend their world beating side this time..
Not that we should have to explain ourselves to you....who cares about the ING Cup anyway? The Pura Cup is the one that we want and is the one where we are very competitive in. The ING Cup is meaningless and nothing more than a bonus if we happen to do well in it.
Not that we should have to explain ourselves to you....who cares about the ING Cup anyway? The Pura Cup is the one that we want and is the one where we are very competitive in. The ING Cup is meaningless and nothing more than a bonus if we happen to do well in it.
:rolleyes:
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 14:49
S.Katich is the wicket needed to win. Nothing after him. The loss of Lewis will hit hard
S.Katich is the wicket needed to win. Nothing after him. The loss of Lewis will hit hard
But the depth! Oh the depth....
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 14:58
If you mean the bowling attack, depth doesnt help with injury during a game
If you mean NSW, Depth? When your no6 cant bat, you suck
If you mean the bowling attack, depth doesnt help with injury during a game
If you mean NSW, Depth? When your no6 cant bat, you suck
When your number 6 will probably not be required, the opposition sucks!
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:08
Anyone got a score? CA has stopped. Probably because the Vics might have got a couple quick wickets and CA wont show it
Anyone got a score? CA has stopped. Probably because the Vics might have got a couple quick wickets and CA wont show it
Isnt Abc radio covering the game?
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:17
They are currently interviewing a Netballer. Probably only updates every couple of hours
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:19
5/219 off 45.? Go you vics. Haddin out. Bradstreet 1* and Lee 2*
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:20
Thornely 0
Katich 92
Jaques 70
McDonald 2/22 (9)
27 off 4 overs
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:23
25 off 3 overs. 2 off Moss over
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:25
Vics fielding well. White stops a certain 4- Dot ball. Full toss- Dot ball. 2 to Bradstreet. 15 balls, 23 runs. Hodge to ball last over probably.
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:28
1 run off another full toss. 1, great fielding by White.
5/226 48 overs
Lee 5*
Bradstreet 5*
McDonald 2/27 (10)
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:29
18 off 10, another full toss= 1 run
16 off 9 2 to Bradstreet
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:30
Hussey to screw up the last over, again
8 off 7, 6 to Bradstreet
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:31
8 off the last over, D.Hussey to bowl
dr nick
21 Nov 2004, 15:34
i think the last 12 deliveries have been full tosses
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:37
Scores level, 1 ball left
dr nick
21 Nov 2004, 15:38
NSW win it, on the last ball! Bradstreet with a 6!!! to finish it off
phew.... I just wish that was on tv sounded like a great match.
mcphee_is_a_gun
21 Nov 2004, 15:38
i think the last 12 deliveries have been full tosses
6 off the last ball to win the game!
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:38
Damn Mick Lewis getting injured. Never going to win when a part-time spinner has to bowl last over
Hahaha Vics go down again. Yes! WOOO!
eddiesmith
21 Nov 2004, 15:39
If it was on TV it would have gone off the air with an over to go at 5:30
Unwritten_Law
21 Nov 2004, 15:39
Always an excuse :D