PDA

View Full Version : Nathan Thompson vs Jade Rawlings


Firrito24
10th May 2005, 19:20
who would u rather on your team.

cschreuder61
10th May 2005, 19:21
Jade Rawlings was better for us than Thompson

Choota
10th May 2005, 21:40
Jordan Lewis and alot of salary cap space. :)

cschreuder61
10th May 2005, 21:41
Jordan Lewis and alot of salary cap space. :)
Lol.

celtic_pride
13th May 2005, 14:33
Nathan Thompson

mattyc2422
13th May 2005, 15:30
Neither will be premiership players.

Firrito24
13th May 2005, 15:58
Neither will be premiership players.

Thompson has 3-5 years left in him (depending on form/injuries), north will win a flag in the next 5 years!

Ipaidmy200in89
13th May 2005, 16:21
Neither will be premiership players.

The footy world has known that for years.

Thewlis Dish
13th May 2005, 22:05
The footy world has known that for years.

Matty would say that about either player even if they were playing for a powerhouse club.

They're both scum to him.

Pie 4 Life
13th May 2005, 22:25
Nathan Thompson. :p Obviously! :rolleyes:

konstas_87
14th May 2005, 11:43
both are pathetic excuses for well-payed players.

Awesome_Wells
14th May 2005, 11:48
The Big Arab

ARDENSTREETforever
14th May 2005, 11:49
Thommo.
he can take a strong pack mark, and kick a goal.

superstar
14th May 2005, 11:58
Matty would say that about either player even if they were playing for a powerhouse club.

They're both scum to him.
Doubt it. Hawthorn people don't hold Rawlings in high regard. We persisted with him for many years before he made the grade, allowing him to recover from some pretty serious injuries. As soon as he smelt the dollars, he packed up and left. I've got no sympathy for his current plight.

Thommo is a different kettle of fish. He never went anywhere near living up to expectations at Hawthorn (Rawlings was a far better player for us), but he didn't leave for money. He thought the change of scenary might help him with his illness and I hope it does. While not starring, he's been servicable for the roos so far, which is alot more than moneybags Jade has been for the doggies.

Not really missing either of them from our list though. As far as the trades go, we did alot better out of Thompson, as it brought Lewis to the club.

kangaroo19
15th May 2005, 02:27
Despite the criticism Thommo has received since the trade period, he has played really well for us. Hasn't set the world on fire, but I think we woule be lost without him. If we didn't have him at CHF, god help us, we would be forced to play Petrie there. Hack of the highest order, young Drew.

Thommo > Rawlings

Cassius_Clay
15th May 2005, 11:34
Neither.

Firrito24
15th May 2005, 14:33
Neither.

what if they changed thier names to Nathan Shaw, Nathan Cloke, Jade Shaw or Jade Cloke?

My North
15th May 2005, 15:03
both players left the Hawthorn, the family club, has there was bitching there for a few years. All now has changed at Hawthorn under the Clarkson

Johnson#26
15th May 2005, 15:31
Thommo

diehard pie
16th May 2005, 20:42
Both no hopers

wells is god
17th May 2005, 19:34
Thommo

ngbrown
17th May 2005, 20:02
Thompson has 3-5 years left in him (depending on form/injuries), north will win a flag in the next 5 years!
lol. good luck with your old crap list