View Full Version : Hilton in- Meyer out-
Nbrown7
16 Jun 2005, 18:08
Thtas the change
rfctigerarmy
16 Jun 2005, 18:18
Surely not...
Tambling? Tivendale? What is going on :confused:
mellowyellow
16 Jun 2005, 18:27
Is that it!
Agree with rfc.Tivendale should be dropped... and where's Hyde.
The emergency list will be noteworhty given the list of players struggling with injuries.
Thrice3
16 Jun 2005, 18:39
I had a feeling Tivendale was not going to be dropped, in the article TW wrote for the RFC website, I understand he is trying to persist with the playing group rather than dismissing them for turn overs and such..
Very suprised that Hyde has not been an inclusion.
Stafford678
16 Jun 2005, 18:41
listening to TW on white line fever last nite sounds like they wont drop tivendale, they want to "work with him" rather then just put him away in the 2's, but the good news is that if he keeps stuffing up he wont be on our list next year
mellowyellow
16 Jun 2005, 18:46
How does Hiltons inclusion give us more pace,something wallace cited that we lacked last week. Hydes inclusion would have given us that extra spark and run out of the middle,something we'll need against the crows.
mellowyellow
16 Jun 2005, 18:49
but the good news is that if he keeps stuffing up he wont be on our list next year
Are they Wallace's words or are you reading between the lines?
Thrice3
16 Jun 2005, 18:52
No Hyde astounds me, playing against Adelaide we would need all of our best midfielders possible.
Hyde put his hand up to play another game for Coburg - said he felt he needed another "no helmut" game to fully get his confidence back.
Full marks to him for having the courage to tell the coaching panel this.
Stafford678
16 Jun 2005, 19:24
Are they Wallace's words or are you reading between the lines?
Well wallace was answering a quesiton about tivendale and he was saying along the lines of we want to work with him rather then just forget about him and putting him aside (coburg i guess), and im not exactly sure what he said but it was like and if he cant be taught or improve then he wont be around , same as anyone else....
it was somthing like that anyway but i guess its since he has played over a 100 games they think he has somthing to offer and they want to try and improve his decison making and he if he can't by the end of the year hes gone
mellowyellow
16 Jun 2005, 20:05
Thanks for the explanation stafford, seems to be consistent with the following article.
http://richmondfc.com.au/default.asp?pg=news&spg=display&articleid=209683
emergencies: Shulz Morrison Hyde.
Crumden
16 Jun 2005, 20:30
emergencies: Shulz Morrison Hyde.
Schulz and morrison as 2 of the 3 emergencies suggests at least one of the named big men won't be playing.
Darth_Tiger
16 Jun 2005, 20:41
probly richo
Richo is a 70/30 chace of playing. Will most likely not and will see scultz come into the team.
jackson_rules
16 Jun 2005, 21:44
i wanna see morro come in but as a defender not forwad
In: Despair
Out: Hope
:(LMAO @ some more home truths
GhostofJimJess
16 Jun 2005, 22:04
Richo is a 70/30 chace of playing. Will most likely not ...
Were you away the day they did ratios ?
tigerboyz
16 Jun 2005, 22:17
that's a disgrace not dropping dudendale,what did terry say "we have work him through this" or something!.you've got to be joking how can you work with junk? :cool:
Were you away the day they did ratios ?
His school learnt ratios during an excursion to the TAB :)
Tigerland
17 Jun 2005, 10:02
i wanna see morro come in but as a defender not forwad
-----------------------------------------------------
Morrison in the backline - please no. Crunch game for us. Not the time to be experimenting with our backline - particularly with a player that hasn't proven himself at AFL level.
I reckon Hyde will play , trying to pull a bit of a ruse .
The Dice Man
17 Jun 2005, 11:58
Could be IDGAF. If it's true that Chris Hyde wanted another week at Coburg to build up confidence without the helmet, it would appear strange to name his as an EMG.
You might be onto something.
I thought there would have been more changes. I can only think of one reason of why Tivendale is playing and that is because he takes chances and runs with the footy.
Anyway, Richo, Knobel and Simmonds and one other (not named) I guess, Stafford or Hilton
the 3 emergencies are Morrison, Schulz and Hyde. No Tambling?
BTW, what happens if all 4 miss and we only have 3 emergencies??
BTW, what happens if all 4 miss and we only have 3 emergencies??
We name someone and cop a fine. $10,000 rings a bell?
We name someone and cop a fine. $10,000 rings a bell?
Thats very unfair.
jackson_rules
17 Jun 2005, 19:06
-----------------------------------------------------
Morrison in the backline - please no. Crunch game for us. Not the time to be experimenting with our backline - particularly with a player that hasn't proven himself at AFL level.
so you dont want to play a guy who is now playing the best footy of his career since going back :rolleyes: god get over last year and see morrison is coburgs best player and will be a very good defender when eventually called up to senior level
Thats very unfair.
Don't name injured players then. Calling up guys who aren't named as emergencies leads to a fine.