View Full Version : Who is more lazy, Tarrant or....
Demonheart
25 Jun 2005, 23:19
Tarrant has taken laziness to a new level this year, but how does he stack up against the master of sleep ins?
davey_magik
25 Jun 2005, 23:31
Obsessive troll.
Mate you've got players like Buckley and Burns who work their ars*s off to get the ball down there then you have a lazy **** who is a sh*t kick for goal. Get rid of him.
Mate you've got players like Buckley and Burns who work their ars*s off to get the ball down there then you have a lazy **** who is a sh*t kick for goal. Get rid of him.
Why are you so keen to see us improve?
Buy a membership.
Demonheart
25 Jun 2005, 23:35
Obsessive troll.
100% of votes for Tarrant, thanks for voting.
Coondog 17
25 Jun 2005, 23:37
From what i see O'Bree is the most hated player at Collingwood. If Tarrant work as hard as he does he might become a great footballer. At the moment he is a overrated hack. I know that is harsh but it's true.
100% of votes for Tarrant, thanks for voting.
Don't thank me, thank EMIRATES.
Demonheart
25 Jun 2005, 23:43
Don't thank me, thank EMIRATES.
Yes lets not forget Emirates, or the Lexus centre. Lets not forget all the cash the pies can make, but what can they do with it all is the most important question - produce squibs like Tarrant and Didak.
Thewlis Dish
25 Jun 2005, 23:46
Yes lets not forget Emirates, or the Lexus centre. Lets not forget all the cash the pies can make, but what can they do with it all is the most important question - produce squibs like Tarrant and Didak.
Let him have this one mate, the whole "Obsessed" and "Buy a Membership" taunts are just a sure sign that the criticism is legitimate, simply because he doesn't have a comeback that's able to dispute the issue.
Yes lets not forget Emirates, or the Lexus centre. Lets not forget all the cash the pies can make, but what can they do with it all is the most important question - produce squibs like Tarrant and Didak.
At least we can rest assured that our great club will exist beyond the next decade, unlike your tin-rattling, debt-engulfed rabble.
Demonheart
25 Jun 2005, 23:50
At least we can rest assured that our great club will exist beyond the next decade, unlike your tin-rattling, debt-engulfed rabble.
Go on make this thread about Melbourne, I knew you wanted to.
Thank$ for the QB game, lots of cash to help us survive and a guaranteed 4 points, it's just a pity we don't get to play your mob twice a year.
Go on make this thread about Melbourne, I knew you wanted to.
Thank$ for the QB game, lots of cash to help us survive and a guaranteed 4 points, it's just a pity we don't get to play your mob twice a year.
Always happy to help out the battlers where we can.
We've been keeping the competition afloat for century.
Demonheart
26 Jun 2005, 00:02
Always happy to help out the battlers where we can.
We've been keeping the competition afloat for century.
I'm always happy having a guaranteed four points from the pitiful pies, thanks for contributing.
I'm always happy having a guaranteed four points from the pitiful pies, thanks for contributing.
You've got a short memory.
Demonheart
26 Jun 2005, 00:41
You've got a short memory.
You have fat hands, my memory can't be that bad.
You have fat hands, my memory can't be that bad.
We've beaten you twice as many times as you've beaten us.
I deal in facts, you peddle bias and conjecture.
Demonheart
26 Jun 2005, 00:49
We've beaten you twice as many times as you've beaten us.
I deal in facts, you peddle bias and conjecture.
Obviously you live in the past.
Say hi to Elvis for me.
Obviously you live in the past.
Say hi to Elvis for me.
We've won 3 of the last 5. Fairly recent past I would have thought.
Do you ever think before you dribble this ********?
Demonheart
26 Jun 2005, 12:44
We've won 3 of the last 5. Fairly recent past I would have thought.
Do you ever think before you dribble this ********?
We've won the last two, and your team is now completely different to the team that won in 2003, but more to the point so is Melbourne. Melbourne is on the rise but Collingwood are still decaying due to poor drafting.
Do you understand anything about football? Sometimes (correction, all the time) I doubt it, you continue to post garbage demonstrating a total lack of knowledge or understanding of the game of football or your ability to accurately rate individual players, and for what? So you can create an allegedly funny troll.
The sad thing is that you've run out of jokes and now you've resorted to posting the same sad shiite day in and day out because you don't have the intelligence to think laterally. You spend so much time on this forum that I'm surprised how you manage to put enough hours into your business life to make a decent living, but I suppose that's why you probably still live with your parents.
Enjoy your sad life fat hands.
viccles
26 Jun 2005, 13:59
Forgot to put Dislack on this poll
plugger20
26 Jun 2005, 21:30
Two of tarrants below the knees pickup attempts the other night were absolutley dreaful! looked like he was asleep in the first one, he just couldnt be bothered to bend down. the second was a half volley and he just toe poked it...he coulda done much better!
Swifty_446
27 Jun 2005, 10:32
Tarrant has 40 more goals in his 1st 8 seasons than Neitz had after his 1st 8 seasons.
Swifty_446
27 Jun 2005, 10:34
We've won the last two, and your team is now completely different to the team that won in 2003, but more to the point so is Melbourne. Melbourne is on the rise but Collingwood are still decaying due to poor drafting.
Do you understand anything about football? Sometimes (correction, all the time) I doubt it, you continue to post garbage demonstrating a total lack of knowledge or understanding of the game of football or your ability to accurately rate individual players, and for what? So you can create an allegedly funny troll.
The sad thing is that you've run out of jokes and now you've resorted to posting the same sad shiite day in and day out because you don't have the intelligence to think laterally. You spend so much time on this forum that I'm surprised how you manage to put enough hours into your business life to make a decent living, but I suppose that's why you probably still live with your parents.
Enjoy your sad life fat hands.
Is this the first year that Melbourne has stopped yo-yoing?
How quickly people forget that they were claiming priority picks 2 seasons ago........when did Collingwood last get a priority?
Melbourne aren't anything special, get over yourself, your just another average Melbourne team.
Demonheart
27 Jun 2005, 11:46
Is this the first year that Melbourne has stopped yo-yoing?
How quickly people forget that they were claiming priority picks 2 seasons ago........when did Collingwood last get a priority?
Melbourne aren't anything special, get over yourself, your just another average Melbourne team.
I agree, Melbourne are average and we're second on the ladder, imagine what we could do if we got our act together and played good footy.
I agree, Melbourne are average and we're second on the ladder, imagine what we could do if we got our act together and played good footy.
Another team might actually want to merge with you.
Rozza44
27 Jun 2005, 12:30
Tarrant has taken laziness to a new level this year, but how does he stack up against the master of sleep ins?
I thought it shoulda been something like
Whos is more lazy?
Tarrant or Some Melbourne Forum addict with already almost 3000 posts in front of his PC all day to try and make the dees sound good and the pies sound bad
Swifty_446
27 Jun 2005, 12:48
I agree, Melbourne are average and we're second on the ladder, imagine what we could do if we got our act together and played good footy.
So what if you're second.....you were top last season for a few rounds weren't you? What happened in the end? Hmmmm? Beaten by Essendon? But I thought you were premiership material?
MELBOURNE - OVERRATED
davey_magik
27 Jun 2005, 13:45
Originally posted by Swifty_446
Tarrant has 40 more goals in his 1st 8 seasons than Neitz had after his 1st 8 seasons.
Tarrant didn't play CHB for the first half of his career.
Originally posted by Swifty_446
Is this the first year that Melbourne has stopped yo-yoing?
How quickly people forget that they were claiming priority picks 2 seasons ago........when did Collingwood last get a priority?
Melbourne aren't anything special, get over yourself, your just another average Melbourne team.
You're an idiot.
When was the last time the Bulldogs made finals? When was the last time the Bulldogs won a premiership? Hmmmm? You can say we're overrated, it's alright, you're allowed to be jealous.
Demonheart
27 Jun 2005, 14:06
I thought it shoulda been something like
Whos is more lazy?
Tarrant or Some Melbourne Forum addict with already almost 3000 posts in front of his PC all day to try and make the dees sound good and the pies sound bad
I'm not needed to make the pies sound bad.
celtic_pride
27 Jun 2005, 16:54
I'm not needed to make the pies sound bad.
Don't worry, the Pies players can do that all by themselves.
AllStar7
29 Jun 2005, 00:21
Tarrant has a whole lot of potential, but seems to struggle to perform consistently.
Mick Malthouse was making excuses for him on White Line Fever, but for an experienced player and a key forward, there shouldn't be any excuses.
When he gives it his all, he plays very well. Sadly, he doesn't do that very often. This can only lead to one conclusion... lazy and/or mentally weak.
AllStar7
29 Jun 2005, 00:24
Tarrant has 40 more goals in his 1st 8 seasons than Neitz had after his 1st 8 seasons.
David Neitz:
518 career goals (after round 13, 2005)
Coleman Medal: 2002
MFC Leading goalkicker: 1996, 1997 (equal), 1999, 2002, 2003, 2004
All-Australian 1995 (playing CHB), 2002 (playing FF)
Chris Tarrant
237 career goals (after round 13, 2005)
All-Australian 2003
Leading goalkicker 2001, 2002 (equal), 2003, 2004.
You are really struggling :rolleyes:
celtic_pride
29 Jun 2005, 16:52
This can only lead to one conclusion... lazy and/or mentally weak.
I get the impression that Tarrant just does put in enough week in week out, and thus he's more disinterested which probably equates to being lazy I suppose