View Full Version : Warnie: 93 not out
johnnyhoward
9 Jul 2005, 13:17
Brilliant effort from the man, responded with what he does best on the field. I found this photo pretty interesting considering his circumstances:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v625/johnnyhoward/53212511.jpg
silky-smooth
9 Jul 2005, 13:45
Camera man maliciously did that on purpose. :p
93 not out at stumps from only 73 balls. Hampshire have two wickets in hand so hoping he can get his second ever first class century. Highest score of 107*.
spookism
9 Jul 2005, 13:55
Clearly this means that the Aussies respond well after being in controversy...
Re: Symonds and now Warnie.
I propose that the entire Australian team go on an all-night bender at a Casino, then assault a bouncer before texting a stripper on their mobile before going around their place to have sex with them...
Australia would then abolish any side that came before them...
Clearly this means that the Aussies respond well after being in controversy...
Re: Symonds and now Warnie.
I propose that the entire Australian team go on an all-night bender at a Casino, then assault a bouncer before texting a stripper on their mobile before going around their place to have sex with them...
Australia would then abolish any side that came before them...
That's the sort of thing I like to hear.
If we can only get them taking recreational drugs they might even win the one day series.
Stafford678
9 Jul 2005, 18:51
Brilliant effort from the man, responded with what he does best on the field. I found this photo pretty interesting considering his circumstances:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v625/johnnyhoward/53212511.jpg
i cant see a set of stumps or a fielder in sight, very odd pic
Out for 101.
Unfortunately the ton is soured by the fact that Harbajhan Singh hit 84. :eek:
usalion
10 Jul 2005, 12:20
That has to be a picture of the year candidate...classic....Well done, Warnie- champion on the field....great to have a second ton...but let's rip apart the Poms batsmen.....
eddiesmith
10 Jul 2005, 17:44
Should be put up the batting order above those underperforming batsman, oh wait, that would mean he would be opening in the first test.
The way the top order is going atm, he will have to make a century or 2 to stop Aus making some of their lowest ever scores and their worst ever losses
Should be put up the batting order above those underperforming batsman, oh wait, that would mean he would be opening in the first test.
The way the top order is going atm, he will have to make a century or 2 to stop Aus making some of their lowest ever scores and their worst ever losses
Warne is the reason why our top order worries will be a non issue. If we can some make half decent totals then Warne and McGrath will do the rest.
year of the roo
10 Jul 2005, 18:52
What a star! He will single handedly rip England a new one.
johnnyhoward
10 Jul 2005, 18:59
Should be put up the batting order above those underperforming batsman, oh wait, that would mean he would be opening in the first test.
While we're at it, put Harbhajan in at number 4. Good innings from Warnie, but let's face it it was against a pyssweak attack and I highly doubt Warnie will do anything remotely similar with the bat in the Ashes. But he can't do much worse than our batting lineup right now. ;)
too bad he can't bowl. :D
2/108 as Middlesex romped home against Hampshire. :D
ben.carbonaro
11 Jul 2005, 22:23
i cant see a set of stumps or a fielder in sight, very odd pic
Yeah, I noticed that.
I wonder why it was taken this way ?
Yeah, I noticed that.
I wonder why it was taken this way ?
because Warney was standing infront of the sign saying SEX NOW. :D :p