View Full Version : RFC best get and why? Staff or Hudson?
rfctigerarmy
9 Oct 2001, 17:39
Who do you fellow Richmond supporters think is the Tigers best get?
Greg Stafford
OR
Paul Hudson
and why?
I think Stafford is the better get I am pretty sure he his a bit younger than Huddo. With Stafford he can play ruck which will allow Otto to play up forward more rather than spending the majority of the game rucking.
Picking up Hudson as a crumbing forward means that there want be as much pressure on Pettifer and Krakouer to develop as quickly as what they otherwise would have had to. There is probably room in the team for Huddo and one of Pettifer and Krakouer.
QLD Tiger
9 Oct 2001, 21:26
LMAO
Daffy & Bourke gone for Stafford & Hudson. CANNOT STOP LAUGHING! Now we can play Stafford in the Ruck with Ray Hall as back-up, Ottens, Richo, Hudson, Pettifer / Krakouer in the forwards and we've retained Holland and Gaspar. WHAT CAN I SAY BUT - YEAH BABy YEAH!
rfctigerarmy
13 Oct 2001, 20:42
Staff is better in my opinion.
RichmondEmma
18 Oct 2001, 17:17
Originally posted by QLD Tiger
LMAO
Daffy & Bourke gone for Stafford & Hudson. CANNOT STOP LAUGHING! Now we can play Stafford in the Ruck with Ray Hall as back-up, Ottens, Richo, Hudson, Pettifer / Krakouer in the forwards and we've retained Holland and Gaspar. WHAT CAN I SAY BUT - YEAH BABy YEAH!
yeah i totally agree.i also think Stafford is a better get and kretchy your right Stafford is a bit yonger than Hudson
TigerTank
18 Oct 2001, 17:28
The only question mark on Stafford is desire. He certainly has ability, but Swans fans I know suggest that he just goes through the motions at times.
I hope that being traded has given him a bit of a fright.
As for Hudson, while I initially thought this was a bad move, the longer I think about it, the more sense it makes.
Expect Hudson to play a dual role at the club - goal sneak (obviously!), but also a playing assistant coach for developing small forwards like Krakouer, Pettifer and even Dragisevic (who is still young in playing terms).
tigergal
19 Oct 2001, 10:15
the only reason thast stafford had a ****house year last years is becuase he changed his number to no 1.. it has happenend to a few players ... no joke...
Chilli Afterglow
19 Oct 2001, 12:07
Originally posted by tigergal
the only reason thast stafford had a ****house year last years is becuase he changed his number to no 1.. it has happenend to a few players ... no joke...
Jeff Farmer changed his number from 33 to 8 then back to 33 again after his form deserted him!