View Full Version : Mark Bolton + Dean Rioli for Daniel Kerr?
Gunnar Longshanks
20 Sep 2005, 00:54
Isn't that what you guys would be offering?
You guys are renowned for offering quality at the trade table.
Isn't that what you guys would be offering?
You guys are renowned for offering quality at the trade table.
Only if you chuck in a 2nd round pick. Oh and we'll throw in Murphy and you give us Judd. Seems fair to me.
******** off Gunnar, you're a clown.
Gunnar Longshanks
20 Sep 2005, 07:57
Only if you chuck in a 2nd round pick. Oh and we'll throw in Murphy and you give us Judd. Seems fair to me.
******** off Gunnar, you're a clown.Check out the Collingwood board.
I posted a similar thread there and the guy who responded thought I was serious.
BBBWWWAHAHAHA.....
Longy413
20 Sep 2005, 08:10
Got a link to where this was suggested?
Is Daniel Kerr a better player than he was this time yesterday because he came 2nd in the Brownlow?
dave_27
20 Sep 2005, 09:44
Daniel McConnell for pick 7?
lmfao.
Gunnar Longshanks
20 Sep 2005, 09:55
Daniel McConnell for pick 7?
lmfao.We both know I never suggested that as a straight swap.
I suggested that as an upgrade.
If you were interested in being accurate you would have written McConnell + pick 19 ----> pick 7.
But don't worry about the facts.
I'm sure you'll get someone good with Ted Richards and your 3rd rounder.
We both know I never suggested that as a straight swap.
I suggested that as an upgrade.
If you were interested in being accurate you would have written McConnell + pick 19 ----> pick 7.
But don't worry about the facts.
I'm sure you'll get someone good with Ted Richards and your 3rd rounder.
Hey we got pick 6 and a player for danny jacobs.
Pick 4 for Todd Ridley
pick 12 for Rick Olarenshaw.
You may think we overrate our players but going on past history we arent alone.
Longy413
20 Sep 2005, 10:01
Just like no one stated Bolton and Rioli in a swap for Kerr.
If you are going to throw mud at least don't be guilty of it yourself.
This is the second time you have come on here and fabricated what others have said. It is embarrassing, please take your act elsewhere.
Gunnar Longshanks
20 Sep 2005, 10:39
please take your act elsewhere.I tried it on the Collingwood board, but the one guy who responded thought I was serious.
Clealry they didn't appreciate my satire as my thread got closed.
Longy413
20 Sep 2005, 10:46
I'm not sure if anyone appreciates anything about you.
Gunnar Longshanks
20 Sep 2005, 10:56
I'm not sure if anyone appreciates anything about you.Stop sooking.
You know you come up with stupid trades.
Longy413
20 Sep 2005, 11:04
Stop sooking.
You know you come up with stupid trades.
I haven't suggested one single trade. So once again, stop putting words in my mouth.
Wouldn't bother Longy, this clown won't give up, no matter what you say, he'll just come back with crap after crap
Gunnar Longshanks
20 Sep 2005, 11:33
Wouldn't bother Longy, this clown won't give up, no matter what you say, he'll just come back with crap after crap
Awww.... Didddums.
dave_27
20 Sep 2005, 11:44
We both know I never suggested that as a straight swap.
I suggested that as an upgrade.
If you were interested in being accurate you would have written McConnell + pick 19 ----> pick 7.
But don't worry about the facts.
I'm sure you'll get someone good with Ted Richards and your 3rd rounder.
dont worry im sure you'll upgrade your draft picks by packaging wooden or adkins.
hahahaha.
Longy413
20 Sep 2005, 11:50
Awww.... Didddums.
Intelligent.
Napier_Street
20 Sep 2005, 12:06
I find it endlessly amusing when fans of other clubs take a shot at Essendon for offering up and getting away with bad trades.
So who is the idiot in that negotiation - The Essendon Recruiting Manager or the Other Club's Recruiting Manager?
Essendon isnt guilty of setting up dodgey trades - its the moron who acccepts the deal who has a lot to answer for.
So, yeah, Kerr for Bolton/Rioli sounds fine thanks
bomberbilly
20 Sep 2005, 13:32
kerr would become a superstar if he moved to melbourne and played with essendon. too much midfield competition at the eagles. he wouldve won the brownlow had he been on a different team. but i guess the ultimate is team success and they have a chance of that this weekend. go swans :)
fevolarulez
22 Sep 2005, 15:15
kerr would become a superstar if he moved to melbourne and played with essendon. too much midfield competition at the eagles. he wouldve won the brownlow had he been on a different team. but i guess the ultimate is team success and they have a chance of that this weekend. go swans :)
we would take kerr for bolton and rioli everyday of the week. bolton is a hack, all essendon ppl know this. and rioli very inconsistent.
and had he been on a different team he wouldnt have even been close - kerr at carlton or collingwood, would have polled in the region of 9 votes, not 19.
and dont give one hot year too much support, anyone remembering names like mercuri, headland.
EssendonPride
22 Sep 2005, 15:19
we would take kerr for bolton and rioli everyday of the week. bolton is a hack, all essendon ppl know this. and rioli very inconsistent.
and had he been on a different team he wouldnt have even been close - kerr at carlton or collingwood, would have polled in the region of 9 votes, not 19.
and dont give one hot year too much support, anyone remembering names like mercuri, headland.
Kerr's been good for longer than a year. And yes, everyone knows we'd take the trade, it wasn't actually a serious offer.
As for Rioli being inconsistant... Well.. Once he's actually on the park thats not really the case, although the problem is, he's rarely there.
Darealrath
22 Sep 2005, 15:25
and dont give one hot year too much support, anyone remembering names like mercuri
MERCURI ?!?!
The bloke was a star for a long time. Hird rates him as the best he's played with. 1 brownlow type year yes, but sheer quality for nearly a decade.
Isn't that what you guys would be offering?
You guys are renowned for offering quality at the trade table.
I wouldnt trade those two, daniel kerr is the next des hedland, great in a good team, coz he gets the fourth best tagger.
EssendonPride
22 Sep 2005, 18:39
I wouldnt trade those two, daniel kerr is the next des hedland, great in a good team, coz he gets the fourth best tagger.
Now ive read some stupid things on here... but..
:eek:
Bomber1313
22 Sep 2005, 18:53
I wouldnt trade those two, daniel kerr is the next des hedland, great in a good team, coz he gets the fourth best tagger.
lol, ok keep them then....I really hope your kidding btw!!!
lol, ok keep them then....I really hope your kidding btw!!!
im glad somebody can realise sarcasm when they read it
I wouldnt trade those two, daniel kerr is the next des hedland, great in a good team, coz he gets the fourth best tagger.
It might be true in a way...i wouldn't go as far as saying he is the next Headland but i don't think he would be as good if he was playing for a team with a crap midfield. That's not a criticism of Kerr, just that in a team like West Coast there will always be a couple of midfielders that have great days due to the sheer number of a-grade midfielders they have. That's why Kerr got so many Brownlow votes.
dave_27
22 Sep 2005, 19:24
MERCURI ?!?!
The bloke was a star for a long time. Hird rates him as the best he's played with. 1 brownlow type year yes, but sheer quality for nearly a decade.
exactly, mercuri was a absolute star in the 90's. i remember freo throwing absolute **** loads of $$$ at him early in his career to get him over their.
Bomaz_Magic
22 Sep 2005, 20:28
As if you'd trade Rioli, the guys won games off his own boot (Saints hisyear, port last) and the fact you compared Mercuri with Headland shows you have no clue.