PDA

View Full Version : Pickett now a demon!!

chiliboy
7 Oct 2005, 02:13
The deal has finally been finalised!!

It will not be part of the motlop-hay deal..


Pickett, Brad Sewell to demons
Ferguson, pick 30 to Hawks
Pick 28, N.Lonie To hawks

Thats the reported deal..

However, melbourne want another late pick from hawks foir Feguson, or that deal may fall through..

Sewell will fit in well, as for Pickett, well, talk about what the doctor ordered!!

Pickett has agreed to terms with the demons, regardless of what the deal is, if all else fails, straight swap for 28..

Armstrong likely to go to port also, a deal still yet to be decided, possibly Damon White..

Chris Heffernan has become a bomber, most likely deal a swap for either Bullen or Cupido, or a pick..only prob is cats have shown latew interset, and thrown david haynes at the demons, so we'll have too see!!!

The Pickett deal though, is done, he'll be a demon, whether wat trade..
DynamoUltra
7 Oct 2005, 02:24
Point of order, I'm sure you mean pick 28, N. Lonie to Port. Seems fair.

Just on it though, this is only a report. Wait until tomorrow, there'll be a flurry of activity and this may get put on the backburner.
deeps
7 Oct 2005, 02:33
The deal has finally been finalised!!

It will not be part of the motlop-hay deal..


Pickett, Brad Sewell to demons
Ferguson, pick 30 to Hawks
Pick 28, N.Lonie To hawks


What exactly do port get out of this?
DynamoUltra
7 Oct 2005, 02:37
What exactly do port get out of this?

Just a typical Port supporter... All you had to do was read one reply and you would've found out, but no, you couldn't do that...
deeps
7 Oct 2005, 02:42
Just a typical Port supporter... All you had to do was read one reply and you would've found out, but no, you couldn't do that...

no1 bothers to read the junk written by a hawks supporter so buzz off
DynamoUltra
7 Oct 2005, 02:45
no1 bothers to read the junk written by a hawks supporter so buzz off

Junk that you would've found useful, so how then is it junk?

P.S. And since you're quoting me, you must've read it at some stage so your argument is null.
deeps
7 Oct 2005, 03:30
grow up

fyi, i had the page loaded ages ago, and i clicked quick reply when i read it. so at the time, ur post was not there

happy?