View Full Version : Who would take more wickets?
I think the selectors have got it wrong.
dan warna
3 Nov 2005, 09:17
mcgill = international class leg spinner, sure not the greatest ever leggie and leaks like bi.tch under pressure, but definately in the top 20 bowlers in the world
bracken = good ordinary FC bowler.
Mr. Blonde
3 Nov 2005, 09:25
McGill. His test record speaks for itself.
Would have to back Macgill , especially with Australia getting to bowl last .
Bracken = Hack
Just you average left arm seamer.
apollo_creed
3 Nov 2005, 09:52
What about Wrighty Zeke?
What about Wrighty Zeke?
No thanks.
eddiesmith
3 Nov 2005, 10:29
Crap and Crapper, who cares?
Ricketts
5 Nov 2005, 19:46
Kato with his left-arm vomit would snag a few.
GoSydneySwans
5 Nov 2005, 19:49
MacGill is dangerous when bowling with Warne. When you have the greatest bowler in the world coming from one end, who really cares how good MacGill is - you're getting your runs off him.
Johnson#26
5 Nov 2005, 19:56
MacGill, in hindsight, but Bracken DID bowl well - just a bit unlucky that McGrath and Warne took the spoils (didn't get a gig today). Did nothing wrong. MacGill, in tandom with Warney, woulda spun 'em silly.
Macgill... Him and Warne should bowl in tandem all the time from now... especially if we are going to play watson as a back up...
Macca_2311
5 Nov 2005, 20:57
IMO Macgill is the third best bowler in Australia. Don't get me started on Watson.
LIONS then DAYLIGHT
5 Nov 2005, 21:01
I thought Bracken bowled quite well, a little bit unlucky not to pick up Lara LBW and had a hint of shape happening.
Importantly, he kept it tight only going for 23 runs or something like that off 10 overs.
Dot Balls = Maidens
Maidens = Wickets
Thank You Very Much Indeed.
:D :D
I thought Bracken bowled quite well, a little bit unlucky not to pick up Lara LBW and had a hint of shape happening.
Importantly, he kept it tight only going for 23 runs or something like that off 10 overs.
Dot Balls = Maidens
Maidens = Wickets
Thank You Very Much Indeed.
:D :D
Dot Balls = Maidens
Maidens = Wickets
Wickets = Bracken = 0
Macca_2311
5 Nov 2005, 21:13
Wickets = Bracken
I beg to differ
LIONS then DAYLIGHT
5 Nov 2005, 21:20
Dot Balls = Maidens
Maidens = Wickets
Wickets = Bracken = 0
The last line doesn't make sense
Funding must have been cut for education in England.
:D :D
Sorry, I'll simplify it for you a little more.
Bracken = Hack, that doesnt take wickets.
bombersno1
5 Nov 2005, 23:41
Ricky Ponting bowling his medium pace rubbish has more chance of getting a wicket than Bracken!