View Full Version : Gardiner v Seaby
Simple Question, which will play as Dean Cox backup, one wont be in our best 22, this is a good problem to have. Which one will be sent to the WAFL peoples
mick ryan
28 Dec 2005, 08:21
Probably neither but I know who will be around the longest and it wont be Gardiner.
Eagles 4 Mine
28 Dec 2005, 09:07
I would love it to be Gardiner we would be unbeatable if he could hit his straps again.:thumbsu:
coasting
28 Dec 2005, 09:48
Simple Question, which will play as Dean Cox backup
Probably neither
http://www.footballhuddles.com/vbulletin/images/smilies/smilielol.gif
assuming they are in form, there is room in the 22 for both
hawkeye23
28 Dec 2005, 11:10
Seaby's development shouldn't be stalled in order for Gards to possibly rekindle his glory years.
wce_all_da_way
28 Dec 2005, 15:42
Seaby's development shouldn't be stalled in order for Gards to possibly rekindle his glory years.
Agreed. Seaby should be the back-up ruckman
Milenko
28 Dec 2005, 16:15
Yeah Gardiner is complete rubbish, a couple of poor games with a busted up foot, let's just throw the guy on the scrapheap.
Some of you people have very short memories.
Lynch drops a mark
28 Dec 2005, 16:46
a fit gardy > a young seaby
Gardiner, and Seaby will come in when Gardiner gets injured or if, god forbid Cox gets injured.
daddy_4_eyes
28 Dec 2005, 18:04
a fit gardy > a young seaby
Give us a fit Gardiner and Cox will be the one playing back-up.
bunting
28 Dec 2005, 18:12
Please stop writing off gardiner think back a couple of years and just remember how bloodly good he really was. Give him a chance to get over his chronic injuries and hope he gets back to the way he was. To answer the question Gardiner before Seaby but i believe both in our best 22 with Cox.
mick ryan
28 Dec 2005, 20:16
http://www.footballhuddles.com/vbulletin/images/smilies/smilielol.gif
Just another of the many examples of you lacking sufficient intelligence to read and understand.
Underdog
28 Dec 2005, 20:37
Seaby's development shouldn't be stalled in order for Gards to possibly rekindle his glory years.
I hope you are joking.
Lynch drops a mark
28 Dec 2005, 21:03
gardy is only 26
if he can get his feet and hamstrings right then he could play another 5-6 seasons
Gardiner.
But both are good enough to play a part in our best 22.
Bestbird
29 Dec 2005, 03:50
Gardiner provided he is fully fit and has not lost too much of his agility
Some of his ruckwork in 2003 was simply sublime
gardy is only 26
if he can get his feet and hamstrings right then he could play another 5-6 seasons
more, ruckmen generally play a little longer than most.
people gotta remember that jako had a rough season the first one back from a serious knee injury, he recaptured his form (if never his speed) and played some bloody good football
gardiner, should he get fit and develop a little enthusiasm for the game again, could become a top line ruckman again
good luck to him, i hope he does
hawkeye23
29 Dec 2005, 08:06
I hope you are joking.
I didn't say anything negative against Gards. I'm just saying that given his track record of injury, we shouldn't be holding too much hope that Gards can play a full season. I'm also saying that Seaby is developing nicely, and we should continue to nurture that. We need to look to the future.
Goldenblue
30 Dec 2005, 17:09
Gardy.
Like Milenko said, some people have short memories. Gardy when in form is one of the best ruckmen on the ground and his mobility allows him to move forward and present a target.
The best number 1 draft pick by a yard.
mick ryan
31 Dec 2005, 18:20
Gardy.
The best number 1 draft pick by a yard.
Debatable!
sdb4884
31 Dec 2005, 18:39
Debatable!
Who else is there? Banfield and no others come to mind.
Lynch drops a mark
31 Dec 2005, 19:09
riewaldt
riewaldt
he's overated
a fit gardy would be good for the eagles no doubt, but i doubt whether he will be fit, i therefore think that seaby will be the backup ruckman to cox