View Full Version : Friday's ins and outs
I'm the Juggernaut
6 Apr 2006, 17:11
In: Stafford, Thursfeld ,Hartigan
Out: Tambling, Rodan, Pattison
Punt_Road_Roar
6 Apr 2006, 17:36
They are missing a name
Out: D.Gaspar
itsintheblood
6 Apr 2006, 17:51
They are missing a name
Out: D.Gaspar
Krakouer for mine. He's really starting to get under my skin this lad. He's like a wax dummy at madame Tasaudes.
True Thylacine
6 Apr 2006, 17:52
Some pretty soft options there. Some of the culprits of last week have one weeks reprieve before redemption should be swift and cruel!
CoggaRules
6 Apr 2006, 17:52
funny stuff, its always the kids that cop it in the neck, when all the angst has surrounded our on field leaders. ;)
tigerboyz
6 Apr 2006, 17:54
Krakouer for mine. He's really starting to get under my skin this lad. He's like a wax dummy at madame Tasaudes.
that was best line you've ever come up with.:D
With St.Kilda's talls and our lack of experienced /decent counterparts, dropping Gaspar would be suicide.
I don't think we need to over-react or lump someone with the scapegoat tag. Just pick the right team for the day.
funny stuff, its always the kids that cop it in the neck, when all the angst has surrounded our on field leaders. ;)
Possibly, but the three that are out were probably the three worst players on the ground last Friday.
tigerboyz
7 Apr 2006, 08:47
I want to know why petticoat didn't get dropped?.
I want to know why petticoat didn't get drooped?.
Because he was in our best 10 players and there isn't an untapped, inexhaustable supply of AFL players for us to call up as some seem to think. You can't just drop guys without bringing someone in, and there aren't that many candidates.
tigerboyz
7 Apr 2006, 09:30
Because he was in our best 10 players and there isn't an untapped, inexhaustable supply of AFL players for us to call up as some seem to think. You can't just drop guys without bringing someone in, and there aren't that many candidates.
One of our top ten you have to be kidding,his job is to goals for us and I'd rather try a kid with a bit of heart than petticoat because other than a reasonable season year he has been a great disappointment.
True Thylacine
7 Apr 2006, 09:53
Because he was in our best 10 players and there isn't an untapped, inexhaustable supply of AFL players for us to call up as some seem to think. You can't just drop guys without bringing someone in, and there aren't that many candidates.
The fatal truth of the matter.
One of our top ten you have to be kidding,his job is to goals for us and I'd rather try a kid with a bit of heart than petticoat because other than a reasonable season year he has been a great disappointment.
Name ten that played better than him.
itsintheblood
7 Apr 2006, 09:56
that was best line you've ever come up with.:D
Aw shucks. Thanks.
CoggaRules
7 Apr 2006, 10:40
Name ten that played better than him.
and there in lies the answer to the last decade's tiger B&Fs.
Anyway, we can feel comfortable tonight since our current B&F suggests that after 10 years of footy he was reduced to a first gamer's mentality and "promises" that the supporters wont see it again.
Earth to Bowdo, hello??? ;)
tigerboyz
7 Apr 2006, 11:18
Name ten that played better than him.
open your eyes jezza he's always been a dud and always will be.
tigerdan
7 Apr 2006, 12:50
and there in lies the answer to the last decade's tiger B&Fs.
Anyway, we can feel comfortable tonight since our current B&F suggests that after 10 years of footy he was reduced to a first gamer's mentality and "promises" that the supporters wont see it again.
Earth to Bowdo, hello??? ;)
The worst of them all was DAFFY. He won his B&F because that year they had the wise idea to give votes out of 10 for every player on the field.
Knights should have won it that year but missed a handful of games and Daffy was rewarded for consistency and nothing more.
They saw the light after that and changed the voting system.
By the way, I think Pettifer turned the corner last year.
open your eyes jezza he's always been a dud and always will be.
Again, name 10 that played better than him on the weekend. If he's a dud, and was in our top ten, what does that say about the rest of our side?
CoggaRules
7 Apr 2006, 14:14
Again, name 10 that played better than him on the weekend. If he's a dud, and was in our top ten, what does that say about the rest of our side?
we are in pretty deep sh-ite
By the way how do you evaluate, "better than him"? in what way?
Influence on the result?? Goals scored? How damamging was the HB that was standing him? Like get real man ;)
We can't drop Gaspar and play Schulz and Thursfield on Gehrig, Riewoldt and Hamill....we wanna improve on last week not get another thumping...we also need to see what pride these players have in themselves
CoggaRules
7 Apr 2006, 14:47
We can't drop Gaspar and play Schulz and Thursfield on Gehrig, Riewoldt and Hamill....we wanna improve on last week not get another thumping...we also need to see what pride these players have in themselves
really? wow....so if they do good tonight, that means they have pride in themsleves huh? Even though they threw in the towel when they didnt have pride. Wake up man, pride is suppose to be constant, not when we feel like we need to project it.
The one thing that is constant is the deposit of salary in. Now how do you figure the lads that are feeling bad etc. spent last weeks pay? Or did they feel that bad that they said naaa guys, jsut pay us half for a half hearted attempt.;)