kaysee
6 Apr 2006, 18:16
I see Mick Malthouse has come out saying that he thinks small forwards are just as dangerous as tall fowards with the faster paced game.
I tend to agree with him. Port's best years seemed to be when we had the likes of Burgoyne's, Dew, CCC, Wanganeen, and Mahoney playing at FF. No doubt we had a decent midfield in those years but I still think that those small quick types created havoc for defenders with their twisting turning skill and speed across the ground.
Since we have started trying to play 3 talls up forward I think it is getting too easy for defenses to spoil and run the ball out. I wouldn't mind seeing a forward line like:
FF- Wanganeen, Pearce, Dew
HF- Mahoney, Tredrea/White/Lade, P. Burgoyne
Try to hit the leading targets and if not kick it low to space to let the guys run onto it at ground level.
Thoughts?
I tend to agree with him. Port's best years seemed to be when we had the likes of Burgoyne's, Dew, CCC, Wanganeen, and Mahoney playing at FF. No doubt we had a decent midfield in those years but I still think that those small quick types created havoc for defenders with their twisting turning skill and speed across the ground.
Since we have started trying to play 3 talls up forward I think it is getting too easy for defenses to spoil and run the ball out. I wouldn't mind seeing a forward line like:
FF- Wanganeen, Pearce, Dew
HF- Mahoney, Tredrea/White/Lade, P. Burgoyne
Try to hit the leading targets and if not kick it low to space to let the guys run onto it at ground level.
Thoughts?