View Full Version : Steven Baker or Jed Adcock?
jazza100
9 Apr 2006, 17:20
Who would you prefer in your team?
Adcock.
Baker is better ATM, but Adcock has more time.
jazza100
9 Apr 2006, 18:44
Baker easily, shuts down oppenents when he plays as a tagger, tough as nails, courageous and can play as a skilled back pocket.
Adcock is overated
FFC + BBFC = BBFFC
9 Apr 2006, 18:47
ahahah hazzza..yeh adcock, more potential.
Crutches rock
Homer Jnr
9 Apr 2006, 18:48
Baker easily, shuts down oppenents when he plays as a tagger, tough as nails, courageous and can play as a skilled back pocket.
Adcock is overated
Adcock. Still young and can do everything you just said.
Also doesn't snipe opponents, so will spend more time on the field.
jazza100
9 Apr 2006, 19:43
Club B+F's
Baker: 1
Adcock: 0
Bourky23
9 Apr 2006, 19:47
hahaha when i saw this thread i thought wat a joke and what made me laugh even more was when i saw more ppl rate adcock than bakes lol wat a farce baker by a country mile adcock is a kid yeh thats an advantage for a team in the long term future but you'd be mad not taking baker good taggers are extremely rare and baker is the best in the business especially after seeing crouchs performance today
Ballbanger
9 Apr 2006, 20:00
Adcock. Still young and can do everything you just said.
Also doesn't snipe opponents, so will spend more time on the field.
Don't know why I'm replying to this....only a kid would call himself HomerJnr!!!
If sniping was a prerequisite for lack of talent/ability then how did Lions win three flags?
Fool!!!
Homer Jnr
9 Apr 2006, 20:26
Don't know why I'm replying to this....only a kid would call himself HomerJnr!!!!
Poor grasshopper. Research is a wonderful thing. Making a tool of yourself over a persons name and the origin behind must be embarassing.
Poor grasshopper. Research is a wonderful thing. Making a tool of yourself over a persons name and the origin behind must be embarassing.
:D...
TheBrownDog
9 Apr 2006, 21:02
The kids can call you HoJu!
Seriously though, Adcock. Not many kids come third in the B&F in their first proper season.
Warwick
10 Apr 2006, 20:55
Club B+F's
Baker: 1
Adcock: 0
Seasons played:
Adcock: 2
Baker: >2
The Flying Belgian
10 Apr 2006, 21:15
Adcock is overated
Yeah, 3rd in the B&F in his second year. :rolleyes:
Got a bit of time for Bakes though, besides for his brain-snap swing at Kane Johnson that time. Hard, tough and I'd think a coaches dream due to his selflessness.
But you're comparing two players five years apart. Adcock will most likely develop into a key midfielder for us whereas Baker will be a predominantly defensive player for the rest of his career.
FFC + BBFC = BBFFC
10 Apr 2006, 22:02
well lets see....stkilda supporters says baker...lions boys say adcock.....there maybe a slight touch of bias creeping in. Maybe we should have a look at the mutal supporters descisions....adcock
Monocle
10 Apr 2006, 22:20
well lets see....stkilda supporters says baker...lions boys say adcock.....there maybe a slight touch of bias creeping in. Maybe we should have a look at the mutal supporters descisions....adcock
Adcock would be my choice at West Coast. Baker great tagger however Adcock has far more scope to improve, at the present Baker a harder nut but Adcock greater skill level. IMO
ALwaysNorth
14 Apr 2006, 18:28
Adcock would be my choice at West Coast. Baker great tagger however Adcock has far more scope to improve, at the present Baker a harder nut but Adcock greater skill level. IMO
Ditto except swap West Coast for North .
Limbach_19
14 Apr 2006, 18:32
I would prefer Adcock