Worst Rising Star [Archive]

Delidio

12 Apr 2006, 19:21

who do you think is the worst rising star?
or rather 'least good'?

goDees22

12 Apr 2006, 22:18

Chris Scott easily, although its a pretty decent list of players. Shouldnt have included Mitchell, Rivers or Deledio, all prob too young, whoever voted for rivers:thumbsd:

jackson_rules

12 Apr 2006, 22:23

rivers easily

iameviljez

12 Apr 2006, 22:32

He's still a kid in a man's game, Rivers. Give him time.

m.diddy

12 Apr 2006, 22:33

I just dont rate rivers

TheGeneral

13 Apr 2006, 00:32

Holland easily.

Even though he was a thug Scott was a good player and did some great jobs as part of the side that won three Grand Finals in a row.

Jimi

13 Apr 2006, 00:37

I would probably vote Rivers if I didn't have faith in his potential.
The kid has played only one full season and yet is considered by most to be absolutely integral to the Demons - it's no coincidence that River's suspension and injury coincided with many of our losses last season and this.

spell_check

13 Apr 2006, 02:40

Should rephrase that to "Worst rising Star in terms of off field habits"

Coin_Toss

13 Apr 2006, 10:27

Holland, by a country mile.

DynamoUltra

14 Apr 2006, 21:10

If he didn't get injured, Holland would've been better than others on that list. But hey, we can't judge on potential when this is a retrospective poll.

gandaal

14 Apr 2006, 21:44

lol at the guy who voted for Nathan Buckley :p

utility

14 Apr 2006, 22:03

Scott.

Easily. Holland was a decent player until injuries cut him down.

Warwick

14 Apr 2006, 22:06

Scott was an intergral part to the lions 3-peat. No one rated him because he was surrounded by superstars. Could play anywhere and on anyone. Why bring up "Holland could have been anything", or "Rivers has potential to be great". They haven't done anything - Scott has.

davey_magik

14 Apr 2006, 23:59

I just dont rate rivers

Why? Was injured for the 2nd half of last year (ND not picking him for the final was a stupid decision and not Rivers' fault :mad: ) and had a great 2004, definitely our best tall defender.

cobba

18 Apr 2006, 00:14

Nick Holland

prettyboy

19 Apr 2006, 21:45

Nick holland, you cant use the excuse hes injured all the time hes body just wasnt up to the physical toughness of the AFL when he was injured so many times

celtic_pride

20 Apr 2006, 13:57

Michael Wilson for me.
Has done nothing note worthy.
At least Holland had a couple of decent years for Hawthorn.

Slander

20 Apr 2006, 14:13

Stupid poll.
All have been/will be very good players.

Marns

20 Apr 2006, 14:47

I just dont rate rivers
Is it because you're just scared Matty McGuire wont be AA with Rivers breathing down his neck?

Walsh Bay

21 Apr 2006, 22:09

Holland. Campo's year.

Demon in Hell

21 Apr 2006, 23:44

rivers easily

You are a idiot. Watch more games of footy before you make an absolute arse of yourself.