View Full Version : Is Richmond or Essendon, Melbourne currently the worst team in the AFL?
I bet Hawks supporter aren't too pleased with McChawk starting this thread, he is like our Vanda, has gone missing.
fishbowl
11 Jun 2006, 16:59
I bet Hawks supporter aren't too pleased with McChawk starting this thread, he is like our Vanda, has gone missing.
Hawthorn is 3 wins ahead of Essendon, come back when you have more wins than us!
The Dice Man
11 Jun 2006, 17:03
Well it's certainly not Richmond. We're probably the 4th best Vic side right now behind Collingwood, St.Kilda and Melbourne.
Bulldogs perhaps slightly ahead, but debateable.
red+black
11 Jun 2006, 17:19
I'd say Richmond closely followed by Essendon then Melbourne
Obviously Hawthorn after today you idiot. What has Hawthorn achieved since, well, I can't remember that far back :rolleyes:
Bentleigh
11 Jun 2006, 17:37
We have won alot of games for the 'worst' side..
Keithy George
11 Jun 2006, 18:14
Well it's certainly not Richmond. We're probably the 4th best Vic side right now behind Collingwood, St.Kilda and Melbourne.
Bulldogs perhaps slightly ahead, but debateable.
Really? They beat you guys by 115 points. :)
The Dice Man
11 Jun 2006, 18:16
Really? They beat you guys by 115 points. :)
Yes and that was 11 weeks ago. 11 weeks ago Geelong were favorites for the flag too. :)
Gilbert_Hodge
11 Jun 2006, 18:18
Obviously Hawthorn after today you idiot. What has Hawthorn achieved since, well, I can't remember that far back :rolleyes:
Punching the **** out of your soft players?
Keithy George
11 Jun 2006, 18:26
Yes and that was 11 weeks ago. 11 weeks ago Geelong were favorites for the flag too. :)
point taken. I'd say the Bullies would still have the edge though.
BTW - whoever bumped this thread good work, Mchawk, I think the options are now
a) Hawthorn
b) Carlton
c) Essendon
d) Kangaroos
e) Hawthorn with Vandenburg in the team
f) Who cares, equally bad - luckily one of them gets Bryce Gibbs.:)
point taken. I'd say the Bullies would still have the edge though.
BTW - whoever bumped this thread good work, Mchawk, I think the options are now
a) Hawthorn
b) Carlton
c) Essendon
d) Kangaroos
e) Hawthorn with Vandenburg in the team
f) Who cares, equally bad - luckily one of them gets Bryce Gibbs.:)
I like to help my fellow BF posters out. :thumbsu:
Bentleigh
11 Jun 2006, 18:34
Really? They beat you guys by 115 points. :)
- Dogs lost to Adelaide by lots
- We beat Adelade
Mcchawk
12 Jun 2006, 09:12
Bit premature after we belt you this week, who'll be laughing?
footy4eva
12 Jun 2006, 09:41
Won't be long now :p
just like buddy, clarko and all in ur team, your just an aero bar!
yes your all made up of bubbles of nothing
nothing plus nothing , multiplied by nothing = NOTHING!
Mcchawk
12 Jun 2006, 10:28
just like buddy, clarko and all in ur team, your just an aero bar!
yes your all made up of bubbles of nothing
nothing plus nothing , multiplied by nothing = NOTHING!
Funny how you have alot to say yet you refuse to publicly declare your team.
[QUOTE=local]The difference between Melbourne and essendon is that melbourne seem to be playing their worse football now, their best is yet to come. essendon seems to be playing their best now....
QUOTE]
I was on the money with essendon. :thumbsu:
Coughlan
12 Jun 2006, 11:20
This thread was a classic, Mcchawk made a complete ****wit of himself, bagging Richmond supporters for not being able to read but never answered a simple question, or understands the difference between could and would. LMAO, i actually felt sorry for dipper86 in this thread:eek:
Bit premature after we belt you this week, who'll be laughing?
So, have you pulled out the Oxford pocket dictionary and summed up the courage to answer that question that was posed to you so long ago, or do you still need some help with you language comprehension?
Mcchawk
12 Jun 2006, 11:21
This thread was a classic, Mcchawk made a complete ****wit of himself, bagging Richmond supporters for not being able to read but never answered a simple question, or understands the difference between could and would. LMAO, i actually felt sorry for dipper86 in this thread:eek:
So, have you pulled out the Oxford pocket dictionary and summed up the courage to answer that question that was posed to you so long ago, or do you still need some help with you language comprehension?
Can't wait until next weekend when we thrash you
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 11:22
haha KARMA !
Coughlan
12 Jun 2006, 11:33
Can't wait until next weekend when we thrash you
still waiting..........
Mcchawk
12 Jun 2006, 11:35
still waiting..........
You'll be waiting along time to beat us
Coughlan
12 Jun 2006, 11:41
You'll be waiting along time to beat us
answer the question that you were asked many many times or admit that everybody who has replied to you has made you look like a complete and utter moron:)
Mcchawk
12 Jun 2006, 11:47
answer the question that you were asked many many times or admit that everybody who has replied to you has made you look like a complete and utter moron:)
Didn't your parents ever teach you insulting someone shows that you are losing an arguement.
Currently out of the 3 I have Essendon the worst, followed by Richmond then Melbourne (with a big difference between Richmond and Melbourne)
Coughlan
12 Jun 2006, 12:02
Didn't your parents ever teach you insulting someone shows that you are losing an arguement.
Currently out of the 3 I have Essendon the worst, followed by Richmond then Melbourne (with a big difference between Richmond and Melbourne)
Answer the question, that Essendon, Richmond and Melbourne was nothing to do with the question yo continue to evade this was it:
No you didnt, you named no one, you are evading the question.
Would have you beaten the Doggies in round 1? Yes or No ?
Would have you beaten St Kilda in Round 2 at the Dome? Yes or No?
Would have you beaten the Eagles at Subi in Round 3? Yes or No ?
Beatable is not even the same as beaten drop kick :D
The answer is No, NO and NO, on those three days Hawthorn would have lost, you continued to say we could beat them on out day but never answered if you would have beaten them on that day because you wouldnt have beaten them
Mcchawk
12 Jun 2006, 12:04
Answer the question, that Essendon, Richmond and Melbourne was nothing to do with the question yo continue to evade this was it:
The answer is No, NO and NO, on those three days Hawthorn would have lost, you continued to say we could beat them on out day but never answered if you would have beaten them on that day because you wouldnt have beaten them
Why ask a question if you're going to answer it for me
Coughlan
12 Jun 2006, 12:11
Why ask a question if you're going to answer it for me
to show you what a fool you are, and dont bother answering because i will not reply to you again because i am sick lowering my intelligence to your level:)
Mcchawk
12 Jun 2006, 12:19
to show you what a fool you are, and dont bother answering because i will not reply to you again because i am sick lowering my intelligence to your level:)
You clown that doesn't make sense.
to show you what a fool you are, and dont bother answering because i will not reply to you again because i am sick lowering my intelligence to your level:)
There you go. You WILL lower your intelligence whilst trying to hold a normal conversation with McDawk. Its called being dumbed down. It reminds me of an old saying, "Never argue with an idiot. They wear you down and then beat you with experience".
On a more serious note, its a well known fact that it is very hard to hold a decent conversation when the person you are dealing with is at least a couple steps lower on the intellect table than yourself. They unfortunatly lack the capacity to reason, think things through and most importantly look past their narrow view in life. This is generally brought about by poor education and a sheltered life.
Thanks for listening.
Punt_Road_Roar
12 Jun 2006, 15:38
There you go. You WILL lower your intelligence whilst trying to hold a normal conversation with McDawk. Its called being dumbed down. It reminds me of an old saying, "Never argue with an idiot. They wear you down and then beat you with experience".
On a more serious note, its a well known fact that it is very hard to hold a decent conversation when the person you are dealing with is at least a couple steps lower on the intellect table than yourself. They unfortunatly lack the capacity to reason, think things through and most importantly look past their narrow view in life. This is generally brought about by poor education and a sheltered life.
Thanks for listening.
Classic strav :D :thumbsu:
Mcchawk
12 Jun 2006, 15:40
There you go. You WILL lower your intelligence whilst trying to hold a normal conversation with McDawk. Its called being dumbed down. It reminds me of an old saying, "Never argue with an idiot. They wear you down and then beat you with experience".
On a more serious note, its a well known fact that it is very hard to hold a decent conversation when the person you are dealing with is at least a couple steps lower on the intellect table than yourself. They unfortunatly lack the capacity to reason, think things through and most importantly look past their narrow view in life. This is generally brought about by poor education and a sheltered life.
Thanks for listening.
Pathetic Richmond babble
Classic strav :D :thumbsu:
Thank you PRR, but wait, there's more.
Mcchawk
12 Jun 2006, 15:48
Thank you PRR, but wait, there's more.
Intellectual giant :rolleyes:
Intellectual giant :rolleyes:
Next you. Yes. I'm not even trying.:thumbsu:
Coughlan
12 Jun 2006, 23:09
Pathetic Richmond babble
IN-A-BILL-IT-Y TO COM-PRE-HEND THE ENG-LISH LAN-GU-AGE
there you go Mcchawk i even went to the effort of putting it in syllable form for you:thumbsu:
Mcchawk
13 Jun 2006, 09:22
Next you. Yes. I'm not even trying.:thumbsu:
Very funny I know english good and proper :p
Mcchawk
13 Jun 2006, 09:22
IN-A-BILL-IT-Y TO COM-PRE-HEND THE ENG-LISH LAN-GU-AGE
there you go Mcchawk i even went to the effort of putting it in syllable form for you:thumbsu:
Look in your own backyard see above :p
Higgs Boson
2 Jul 2006, 14:47
Bumpity bump.
(Sorry, couldn't help myself. :p)
Bumpity bump.
(Sorry, couldn't help myself. :p)
Very nicely done. :thumbsu:
The real question should be is this current Essendon team the worst ever in the history of the club?
Two more losses is all that's needed.