View Full Version : Simone calls Shane stupid
http://cricket.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1524721.cms
"I'm disappointed in him, that's about it really," she was quoted as saying in the media today.
She said Warne was stupid for falling for the obvious ploy.
"Obviously it was a set-up, but how stupid do you have to be not to see that?"
Haha. Thats a bit of comedy gold there from Simone. :D :thumbsu:
Cooldude
11 May 2006, 13:53
Feel sorry for the kids
Browney
11 May 2006, 17:04
Who fuucking cares.
I dont care about this :D:D:D:D, lets keep the talk on this board about cricket.
Bombers_Forever
11 May 2006, 17:13
She's right. But she is stupid too for staying with him so long.
I pity the kids.....
peternorth
11 May 2006, 17:16
She's right. But she is stupid too for staying with him so long.
I pity the kids.....
exactly, warne as a father figure (ie no father figure), simone as their mum (imagine listening to that all day).
wont somebody think of the children!!
They're both thick. And Shane is so thick I don't think he gives a rat's tossbag how much of his sex life becomes public.
RoosterLad
11 May 2006, 18:37
STUPID? Who cares if he was set up.
He banged TWO models. Not one.. but TWO (2).
dan warna
11 May 2006, 18:39
lmfao cappers part 2
stokesy
11 May 2006, 20:01
A porno with Warney in it, doesn't get much better then that.
apollo_creed
11 May 2006, 20:13
A porno with Warney in it, doesn't get much better then that.
yeah. how hot. :rolleyes:
just maybe
11 May 2006, 20:20
A porno with Warney in it, doesn't get much better then that.
I like to watch Warne bowl, seems you just like to see his balls...
RoosterLad
11 May 2006, 20:36
yeah. how hot. :rolleyes:
If i saw that I'd go for a personal hat trick.
Grimreepah
11 May 2006, 22:07
He banged TWO models. Not one.. but TWO (2).
I'm with you. Credit where credit is due.
Sanguinarius
12 May 2006, 11:36
STUPID? Who cares if he was set up.
He banged TWO models. Not one.. but TWO (2).
at once.
the man is a god
STUPID? Who cares if he was set up.
He banged TWO models. Not one.. but TWO (2).
so who cares if he banged 2 models, he isn't married anymore so he is allowed to do it :p
Grimreepah
12 May 2006, 18:43
at once.
the man is a god
Yet some people on here think knocking back two models who want a threesome is a sign of intelligence.
Remember the scene at the end of Dumb and Dumber. I'm now starting to suspect some people didn't get it.
raikkonen
14 May 2006, 01:17
at once.
the man is a god
Anyone that can get two hot chicks at once is prety good. I think shane should be credited for pulling as many chicks as he does. :thumbsu:
Cooldude
14 May 2006, 03:34
Anyone that can get two hot chicks at once is prety good. I think shane should be credited for pulling as many chicks as he does. :thumbsu:
Mate, he's a famous sportsmen, that's enough to have chicks all over him, he doesn't really need to do anything else ;)
peternorth
15 May 2006, 13:51
now she says she wants nothing to do with him:
"I can't bring myself to even speak to him," she told New Idea magazine.
well stop bringing him up!!! lets face it, you dont want anything to do with him, but you want to keep talking about him for $$$$!
Cooldude
15 May 2006, 14:20
Exhibit A of Warnie being a dumb:D:D:D:D: "I'm a Chelsea supporter, but today I'll be supporting Liverpool", FA Cup Final when he presented the matchball
Bandwagon turncoat who knows jack about football ;)
RoosterLad
15 May 2006, 14:21
yeah that is in the paper today as well, couldnt believe that! she comes out in a new interview saying she doesnt want to speak to him
Exhibit A of Warnie being a dumb:D:D:D:D: "I'm a Chelsea supporter, but today I'll be supporting Liverpool", FA Cup Final when he presented the matchball
Bandwagon turncoat who knows jack about football ;)
The fat prick is a bonafide Liverpool supporter. And just on Simone Warne, she's wearing thin. And just on women, why the feck do they lag on having sex with men.?How many men do you hear trying to make money out of having sex with women?
peternorth
15 May 2006, 20:45
The fat prick is a bonafide Liverpool supporter. And just on Simone Warne, she's wearing thin.
But shes a "celebrity"! she was on dancing with the stars, a clear sign you've made it in the world! :rolleyes:
And just on women, why the feck do they lag on having sex with men.?How many men do you hear trying to make money out of having sex with women?
exactly, im sick of us men being treated like objects. walk into any gentleman's club where you wanna hang with mates and have a drink, and all these nice women see you as $$$ :D
PS: how long till this is moved to TLC?
if men tried to make $$ out of having sex with women we'd be labelled as sleazes :D
But shes a "celebrity"! she was on dancing with the stars, a clear sign you've made it in the world! :rolleyes:
QUOTE=Romeo]And just on women, why the feck do they lag on having sex with men.?How many men do you hear trying to make money out of having sex with women?
exactly, im sick of us men being treated like objects. walk into any gentleman's club where you wanna hang with mates and have a drink, and all these nice women see you as $$$ :D
PS: how long till this is moved to TLC?
if men tried to make $$ out of having sex with women we'd be labelled as sleazes :D[/quote]
Yes and imagine letting men in for free and not women, i.e. the footy on Saturday, the equal opp. commission would go into overdrive.
just maybe
15 May 2006, 21:03
Simone Warne should shut her gob for once. She doesn't need anymore money, she's about as smart as a goalpost and she's just looking like a gold-digger with her public outcries.
Simone Warne should shut her gob for once. She doesn't need anymore money, she's about as smart as a goalpost and she's just looking like a gold-digger with her public outcries.
Yes, she's fast losing public sympathy with her constant ramblings.
she's just looking like a gold-digger with her public outcries.
Do you think that may be because........
*Crash*
16 May 2006, 10:43
The sooner she returns to being a complete nobody the better. You know she will not drop the Warne name, as its all shes got left to cling to.
It just becomes more and more obvious why Shane had to get out of there.
Grimreepah
16 May 2006, 10:44
Do you think that may be because........
....she is a.....
Spare a thought for the children of the Warnes, the school yard slagging they will get.
Grow up Shane, you are not a legend off the field, you are irresponsible.
Yep maybe Simone needs to zip her mouth, but she has to deal with their children every day and maybe she is thinking further ahead than Shane.
Cooldude
16 May 2006, 12:11
The sooner she returns to being a complete nobody the better. You know she will not drop the Warne name, as its all shes got left to cling to.
It just becomes more and more obvious why Shane had to get out of there.
You made it sound like Warnie was the victim