View Full Version : Mundy > Any Richmond Youngster.
Pav for AA
7 Jun 2006, 02:24
To all the Richmond supporters who get a kick out of bagging this bloke, who, from you side has performed as well, I invite all-comers to debate is a respectable manner :thumbsu:
I'm interested to see how you will actually build a decent argument, beyond "Fremantle havent made the finals" and "they wear purple", so far that is all the Brains trust amongst the Richmond supporters have come up with, hardly damning :thumbsu:
But I do, I will open my eyes if you open yours :thumbsu:
AUghhh....yawn...yawn......
Tiger Air
7 Jun 2006, 13:33
I'll go one better and compare both clubs:
RFC:
Overall Success Rate 1908-2005: 51.6%
Premierships: 10
Legends of the Game: 3
Hall of Fame: 9
AFL Team of the Century: 4
Brownlow Medal: 5
Coleman Medal: 5
Rising Star: 1
Norm Smith: 2
Jock McHale: 5
All Australian Selections: 17
Biggest crowd: 119,165
Most Goals: Jack Titus - 970 goals @ 3.3 goals per game
Games Record Holder: Kevin Bartlett - 403
Freo:
Overall Success Rate 1995-2005: 37.9%
Premierships: 0
Legends of the Game: 0
Hall of Fame: 0
AFL Team of the Century: 0
Brownlow Medal: 0
Coleman Medal: 0
Rising Star: 1
Norm Smith: 0
Jock McHale: 0
All Australian Selections: 5
Biggest crowd: 42,770
Most Goals: Matthew Pavlich - 192 goals @ 1.4 goals per game
Games Record Holder: Shane Parker - 214 games
Highest position: 5th...
As you can see:
Freo are an expansion team still finding there way in the main league after 11 years.
Richmond are a club who have their centenary year in the main league in 2008.
It's like comparing the Memphis Grizzlies with the L.A Lakers or Fruity Lexia to Grange.
I wont discuss the young players on either list as I've read your posts and you are either too one-eyed or just ill-informed.
FWIW I personally dont have an issue with the Dockers. I'm an ex-Perth boy and some of my immediate family were inaugural Freo members. However, I do have an issue with somebody who constantly criticises a team that he doesnt hold a candle to. Time to really open your eyes. Have a nice day. :)
Coughlan
7 Jun 2006, 14:30
i urge all richmond supporters to ignore him and his ****, he will eventually go away
*yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn*
Get a life Pav, your just sheer bordem now :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
bassmanx
7 Jun 2006, 16:55
Heh heh...Fruity Lexia
Pav for AA, how come you create all your threads in 'Bay 13' this board is for 'trolling' :) I thought you wanted a serious discussion? But then again how can we when there is nothing to discuss because all your threads are the same and all wrong.
At least you know what you're doing....trolling
Boyler_Room
7 Jun 2006, 17:46
Freo have done nothing, you can talk up the team all you like. You've got no results to back it up.
Sir_Adrian84
7 Jun 2006, 18:50
I'll go one better and compare both clubs:
RFC:
Overall Success Rate 1908-2005: 51.6%
Premierships: 10
Legends of the Game: 3
Hall of Fame: 9
AFL Team of the Century: 4
Brownlow Medal: 5
Coleman Medal: 5
Rising Star: 1
Norm Smith: 2
Jock McHale: 5
All Australian Selections: 17
Biggest crowd: 119,165
Most Goals: Jack Titus - 970 goals @ 3.3 goals per game
Games Record Holder: Kevin Bartlett - 403
Freo:
Overall Success Rate 1995-2005: 37.9%
Premierships: 0
Legends of the Game: 0
Hall of Fame: 0
AFL Team of the Century: 0
Brownlow Medal: 0
Coleman Medal: 0
Rising Star: 1
Norm Smith: 0
Jock McHale: 0
All Australian Selections: 5
Biggest crowd: 42,770
Most Goals: Matthew Pavlich - 192 goals @ 1.4 goals per game
Games Record Holder: Shane Parker - 214 games
Highest position: 5th...
As you can see:
Freo are an expansion team still finding there way in the main league after 11 years.
Richmond are a club who have their centenary year in the main league in 2008.
It's like comparing the Memphis Grizzlies with the L.A Lakers or Fruity Lexia to Grange.
I wont discuss the young players on either list as I've read your posts and you are either too one-eyed or just ill-informed.
FWIW I personally dont have an issue with the Dockers. I'm an ex-Perth boy and some of my immediate family were inaugural Freo members. However, I do have an issue with somebody who constantly criticises a team that he doesnt hold a candle to. Time to really open your eyes. Have a nice day. :)
well said. The dockers in 11 seasons have made the finals once, richmond, even though they have been bad over the last 11 years have made the prelim twice.
Cerpin Taxt
7 Jun 2006, 19:46
M.Johnson > Raines > Deledio > Mundy > the rest
M.Johnson > Raines > Deledio > Mundy > the rest
Dare I say that M.Johnson is key position and the other 3 aren't.
And its 3 Defenders vs a Midfielder
All in favour of banning Pav for AA using :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: smiley say :thumbsu:
Seriously Pav:rolleyes: .
Nothing against mundy, he's a good young bloke, but he's nothing spectacular.....
Armageddon
7 Jun 2006, 19:51
To all the Richmond supporters who get a kick out of bagging this bloke, who, from you side has performed as well, I invite all-comers to debate is a respectable manner :thumbsu:
I'm interested to see how you will actually build a decent argument, beyond "Fremantle havent made the finals" and "they wear purple", so far that is all the Brains trust amongst the Richmond supporters have come up with, hardly damning :thumbsu:
But I do, I will open my eyes if you open yours :thumbsu:
You have reacheda new pathetic low :thumbsu:
RogerMellie
7 Jun 2006, 19:52
To all the Richmond supporters who get a kick out of bagging this bloke, who, from you side has performed as well, I invite all-comers to debate is a respectable manner :thumbsu:
I'm interested to see how you will actually build a decent argument, beyond "Fremantle havent made the finals" and "they wear purple", so far that is all the Brains trust amongst the Richmond supporters have come up with, hardly damning :thumbsu:
But I do, I will open my eyes if you open yours :thumbsu:
For Christ's sake. Give it a rest.
For Christ's sake. Give it a rest.
A voice of reason from a fellow supporter hey Pav :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
Cerpin Taxt
7 Jun 2006, 20:00
Dare I say that M.Johnson is key position and the other 3 aren't.
And its 3 Defenders vs a Midfielder
Dare I inform you of your oversight?
Dare I inform you of your oversight?
You count mundy as key position??
Cerpin Taxt
7 Jun 2006, 20:05
Just look at the thread title. I'm not in the mood.
Just look at the thread title. I'm not in the mood.
Fair enough, the thread is about two teams youngesters regardless of positon played.
Which just highlights how much of a cockspank Pav for AA is :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
To all the Richmond supporters who get a kick out of bagging this bloke, who, from you side has performed as well, I invite all-comers to debate is a respectable manner :thumbsu:
I'm interested to see how you will actually build a decent argument, beyond "Fremantle havent made the finals" and "they wear purple", so far that is all the Brains trust amongst the Richmond supporters have come up with, hardly damning :thumbsu:
But I do, I will open my eyes if you open yours :thumbsu:
Delidio won the rising star for a reason.
Who is Mundy anyway?
Roughead > Mundy.
the only reason mundy gets bagged is because of pav's incessant comparisons to deledio, raines and others in richmond's youth brigade
get over it
the only reason mundy gets bagged is because of pav's incessant comparisons to deledio, raines and others in richmond's youth brigade
get over it
Very true
I would rate Mundy as a very good solid footballer
Pav for AA has turned the world against him SHAME ON YOU PAV :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
itsintheblood
8 Jun 2006, 00:03
To all the Richmond supporters who get a kick out of bagging this bloke, who, from you side has performed as well, I invite all-comers to debate is a respectable manner :thumbsu:
I'm interested to see how you will actually build a decent argument, beyond "Fremantle havent made the finals" and "they wear purple", so far that is all the Brains trust amongst the Richmond supporters have come up with, hardly damning :thumbsu:
But I do, I will open my eyes if you open yours :thumbsu:
U really are becoming quite boring and stupid now. Give it a rest you fool.:thumbsd:
Its funny how Pav AA has made people hate his beloved player. I would not do that to Brett Deledio.:D
Fremantle highest position 5th???
When the hell did that happen???
tigerboyz
8 Jun 2006, 15:20
Mundy sucks-end of story.
Nightwolf
8 Jun 2006, 15:23
Mundy will only ever be a reliable backman...Nothing more..
crazy_big_al
8 Jun 2006, 15:28
this is a stupid thread
Bring-Back-Powell
8 Jun 2006, 15:32
and to think everyone was happy when bee dee left :rolleyes:
celtic_pride
8 Jun 2006, 15:37
and to think everyone was happy when bee dee left :rolleyes:
And what's happened to Parrot and Vanda ???
Place seems really quiet without them.
Punt_Road_Roar
8 Jun 2006, 15:43
And what's happened to Parrot and Vanda ???
Place seems really quiet without them.
Parrot is upset that BF doesnt take his threads seriously anymore ..... like we did to begin with.
As for Wanda LOL we wont see her back till the Bombers are off the bottom.
:thumbsu:
So if we only have to put up with this Pav for AA clown its not all that bad.
:thumbsu:
in all fairness to pav every society or community must contend with the loon element:rolleyes:
and BF is no different;)
Pav for AA
8 Jun 2006, 23:50
Just as I suspected, no replies of any substance, same ole same tripe gushing from the fingertips of the ferals, the ability to produce an effective argument is a skill foreign to those who can barely read.
So far, not one poster, not one, can make an argument as to how any Richmond youngster is above Mundy in terms of performance. Pathetic :thumbsu:
Punt_Road_Roar
9 Jun 2006, 01:09
Just as I suspected, no replies of any substance, same ole same tripe gushing from the fingertips of the ferals, the ability to produce an effective argument is a skill foreign to those who can barely read.
So far, not one poster, not one, can make an argument as to how any Richmond youngster is above Mundy in terms of performance. Pathetic :thumbsu:
Pot kettle black loser :thumbsu:
you dont deserve a decent reply, because when you do get one you ignore it anyway :thumbsu:
Who is Mundy anyway? I was about to ask the same question, who the **** is Mundy?
tigerboyz
9 Jun 2006, 06:55
Just as I suspected, no replies of any substance, same ole same tripe gushing from the fingertips of the ferals, the ability to produce an effective argument is a skill foreign to those who can barely read.
So far, not one poster, not one, can make an argument as to how any Richmond youngster is above Mundy in terms of performance. Pathetic :thumbsu:
There is no argument to put up,Mundy is trash and that's it.
Pav for AA
9 Jun 2006, 16:01
There is no argument to put up,Mundy is trash and that's it.
Exactly what Im talking about, pathetic 3 yr old responses, why cant a tigers supporter say Player X is > Mundy because........
Why?
Mundy > All richmond youngsters :thumbsu: Finally starting to sink in :thumbsu:
celtic_pride
9 Jun 2006, 16:03
Exactly what Im talking about, pathetic 3 yr old responses, why cant a tigers supporter say Player X is > Mundy because........
Why?
Mundy > All richmond youngsters :thumbsu: Finally starting to sink in :thumbsu:
Terry Wallce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cuddles Connolloy
Oh yeah and Mundy will only an average player at a mediocre club (if he stays at Freo) at best.
Delidio won the rising star for a reason.
Who is Mundy anyway?
Roughead > Mundy.
hehe
For Christ's sake. Give it a rest.
Oh dear
even a fellow supporter is telling u to give it up
hehe :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
Exactly what Im talking about, pathetic 3 yr old responses, why cant a tigers supporter say Player X is > Mundy because........Why?
Mundy > All richmond youngsters :thumbsu: Finally starting to sink in :thumbsu:
First of all no one gives a **** about your opinon
Second of all we have a life
Third of all its funny annoying the crap out of u
:thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
tigerboyz
9 Jun 2006, 16:42
Exactly what Im talking about, pathetic 3 yr old responses, why cant a tigers supporter say Player X is > Mundy because........
Why?
Mundy > All richmond youngsters :thumbsu: Finally starting to sink in :thumbsu:
Get a reality check Pav,we all know you're in love with the bloke and that's why you rate him so highly but as far as I'm concerned he doesn't even cut it as an average footballer in the afl.He'll be delisted within two years.
Exactly what Im talking about, pathetic 3 yr old responses, why cant a tigers supporter say Player X is > Mundy because........
Why?
Mundy > All richmond youngsters :thumbsu: Finally starting to sink in :thumbsu:
Delidio > Mundy because...
- He won the rising star
- He's faster
- He has the ability to run and create
- He has had a far greater impact on the game
- He outran Chris Judd
Reply to that you dumb ****.
Pav for AA
9 Jun 2006, 18:03
Delidio > Mundy because...
- He won the rising star
- He's faster
- He has the ability to run and create
- He has had a far greater impact on the game
- He outran Chris Judd
Reply to that you dumb ****.
- Who's performing now, Victorian Panel
- Cares, pace means nothing if you cant find the ball, especially when you are in the midfield
- Mundy had 10 rebounds from 50 last week, if thats not running and creating I dont know what is
- Are you sure, hes done bugger all this year, no impact
- No he didnt, by his own admission he didnt.
Good call, yet to see a decent argument from any poster, hilarious really. You're all saying Mundy's a hack but you cant mount a decent argument. Pathetic :thumbsu:
theghost
9 Jun 2006, 18:27
pavlova you obviously know absolutely nothing about football, some of the stuff you have been posting says that you might have watched little bit of footy but you certainly do not understand to much about it . Iwould certainly be very surprised if you have ever played at any decent level. You do not even know where on the field it is harder to get possession or what it is to influence a game. Sideways possession across halfback to the tune of 20 possies does not always influence a game. I think if you have close look at the rin of deledios he is more holding hs own against Judd considering he bounced 3 times. I wonder pavlington if you have observed deledio has been tagged in just about all games this I don't recall Mundy being tagged Do you?
Who's performing now, Victorian Panel
- Cares, pace means nothing if you cant find the ball, especially when you are in the midfield
- Mundy had 10 rebounds from 50 last week, if thats not running and creating I dont know what is
- Are you sure, hes done bugger all this year, no impact
- No he didnt, by his own admission he didnt.
Good call, yet to see a decent argument from any poster, hilarious really. You're all saying Mundy's a hack but you cant mount a decent argument. Pathetic
Joel Bowden took 20 marks against the Crows. And it means nothing because like MUNDY NO ONE IS EVER ON HIM.
Doing well for a 2nd year 19 yr old. Doing whats expected of him so that is doing well ****NUT :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
Hows this
Franklin,Roughead,Ellis,Deledio,Coughlan,Raines,Birchall > Mundy
keeping with the general theme of this thread.......
thursfield>>>>>>>>>>>>>>m.johnson:p :p
keeping with the general theme of this thread.......
thursfield>>>>>>>>>>>>>>m.johnson:p :p
Make this about Essendon, you know you want to. :p
Coughlan
9 Jun 2006, 19:26
Just as I suspected, no replies of any substance, same ole same tripe gushing from the fingertips of the ferals, the ability to produce an effective argument is a skill foreign to those who can barely read.
Its very very ironic that you say this when you in fact have ZERO substance at all in your argument, all you say is Mundy>Deledio, wheres the substance in that?
The answer there is none.
BTW Deledio is better and will be better then Mundy because
1. He is younger, taken in the draft a year after Mundy as one of the youngest players and still pick 1. Deledio DOB: 18 April 1987
David Mundy DOB: 20 July 1985
2. Made his debut in his FIRST season at 17 years old, played every match plus the International Rules. Mundy's debut season was his SECOND year on the list and plays 17 games. Brett Deledio wins the AFL Rising Star award as well as best first year player voted by the AFL players association (AFLPA). If Mundy was better surely he would have won these awards in a canter, particulary when you think that he is nearly 2 years older.
3. Deledio is has more pace, better marking ability espiacially overhead, better foot and hand skills. Stronger, faster, better. More leadership ability, better awareness.
4. Brett Deledio can play in defence, midfield foward, can play as key foward. David Mundy is a spare man in defence
In Summary: Brett Deledio>>>David Mundy at the present, 2 years time and always.
:thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
tigerboyz
9 Jun 2006, 19:50
Its very very ironic that you say this when you in fact have ZERO substance at all in your argument, all you say is Mundy>Deledio, wheres the substance in that?
The answer there is none.
BTW Deledio is better and will be better then Mundy because
1. He is younger, taken in the draft a year after Mundy as one of the youngest players and still pick 1. Deledio DOB: 18 April 1987
David Mundy DOB: 20 July 1985
2. Made his debut in his FIRST season at 17 years old, played every match plus the International Rules. Mundy's debut season was his SECOND year on the list and plays 17 games. Brett Deledio wins the AFL Rising Star award as well as best first year player voted by the AFL players association (AFLPA). If Mundy was better surely he would have won these awards in a canter, particulary when you think that he is nearly 2 years older.
3. Deledio is has more pace, better marking ability espiacially overhead, better foot and hand skills. Stronger, faster, better. More leadership ability, better awareness.
4. Brett Deledio can play in defence, midfield foward, can play as key foward. David Mundy is a spare man in defence
In Summary: Brett Deledio>>>David Mundy at the present, 2 years time and always.
:thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
In two years time mandy will be delisted.
In two years time mandy will be delisted.
:D :D
Didnt Barry Manalow write a song bout Mundy
I think it went something like "OHH MANDY"
Believe it was a hit :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
Calcium Man
9 Jun 2006, 22:03
Its very very ironic that you say this when you in fact have ZERO substance at all in your argument, all you say is Mundy>Deledio, wheres the substance in that?
The answer there is none.
BTW Deledio is better and will be better then Mundy because
1. He is younger, taken in the draft a year after Mundy as one of the youngest players and still pick 1. Deledio DOB: 18 April 1987
David Mundy DOB: 20 July 1985
2. Made his debut in his FIRST season at 17 years old, played every match plus the International Rules. Mundy's debut season was his SECOND year on the list and plays 17 games. Brett Deledio wins the AFL Rising Star award as well as best first year player voted by the AFL players association (AFLPA). If Mundy was better surely he would have won these awards in a canter, particulary when you think that he is nearly 2 years older.
3. Deledio is has more pace, better marking ability espiacially overhead, better foot and hand skills. Stronger, faster, better. More leadership ability, better awareness.
4. Brett Deledio can play in defence, midfield foward, can play as key foward. David Mundy is a spare man in defence
In Summary: Brett Deledio>>>David Mundy at the present, 2 years time and always.
:thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
You forgot the Brett also won the grand final sprint!
When Mundy runs from the Centre Circle and kicks a goal from 60-65 out that wins freo a match I will say he is better then Brett!
Make this about Essendon, you know you want to. :p
nah mate im talking about the johnson boy from fremantle...but thank for trying:p
Coughlan
10 Jun 2006, 17:49
Deledio played another great game today, to reconfirm that Deledio>Mundy and that his "alleged" second year blues are a complete myth
Calcium Man
10 Jun 2006, 17:56
All the tiger cubs played well today! Pretty happy with all of them and wouldnt swap any for Mundy!
Pav for AA
12 Jun 2006, 17:57
Fremantle Vs Bulldogs
Freo Best Players: Johnson, J Carr, D. Mundy
Mundy : 19 touches, 10 marks, 6 tackles.
Very impressive, quelled numerous forays foward, a significant impact on the game. :thumbsu:
Richmond Vs North Melbourne
Richmond Best Players: P Bowden, M Coughlan, K. Pettifer, J Bowden, A Kellaway, S. Tuck.
Deledio, 25 touches 11 marks, NO IMPACT :thumbsu:
10 came in the last quarter, game was over.
Raines 20 touches 6 marks NO IMPACT :thumbsu:
Mund > Raines and Deledio.
Mundy > Fab 5 how hilarious, fab 5 :thumbsu:
Fremantle Vs Bulldogs
Freo Best Players: Johnson, J Carr, D. Mundy
Mundy : 19 touches, 10 marks, 6 tackles.
Very impressive, quelled numerous forays foward, a significant impact on the game.
Richmond Vs North Melbourne
Richmond Best Players: P Bowden, M Coughlan, K. Pettifer, J Bowden, A Kellaway, S. Tuck.
Deledio, 25 touches 11 marks, NO IMPACT :thumbsu:
10 came in the last quarter, game was over.
Raines 20 touches 6 marks NO IMPACT :thumbsu:
Mund > Raines and Deledio.
Mundy > Fab 5 how hilarious, fab 5 :thumbsu:
LOL welcome back Pav good to see you resurface for more punishment
Quite clearly your speaking dribble as usual.
Raines was in our best quite easily.
Deledio did have an impact, just that so did 14 other Richmond players
And yes Mundy did play well on the weekend
And of Course Fremantle were shown up as urine
:thumbsu: :thumbsu: :thumbsu:
Fremantle Vs Bulldogs
Freo Best Players: Johnson, J Carr, D. Mundy
Mundy : 19 touches, 10 marks, 6 tackles.
Very impressive, quelled numerous forays foward, a significant impact on the game. :thumbsu:
Richmond Vs North Melbourne
Richmond Best Players: P Bowden, M Coughlan, K. Pettifer, J Bowden, A Kellaway, S. Tuck.
Deledio, 25 touches 11 marks, NO IMPACT :thumbsu:
10 came in the last quarter, game was over.
Raines 20 touches 6 marks NO IMPACT :thumbsu:
Mund > Raines and Deledio.
Mundy > Fab 5 how hilarious, fab 5 :thumbsu:
Mundy in a losing team = NO IMPACT
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:02
Pav for AA you are a total loser \o/
Deledio gets more possessions than Mundy pretty much every week and you still say Mundy is better ? god you type some ****. Keep thinking it and you'll start to believe it you clown.
An Ant >>>>>>> Mundy now shut up with that crap. it's bs
Pav for AA you are a total loser \o/
Deledio gets more possessions than Mundy pretty much every week and you still say Mundy is better ? god you type some ****. Keep thinking it and you'll start to believe it you clown.
An Ant >>>>>>> Mundy now shut up with that crap. it's bs
well said
Angus Monfries > Mundy
Pav for AA
12 Jun 2006, 18:07
Mundy in a losing team = NO IMPACT
Check the ladder, then check who we played and who your mob played, and then check how you faired against that side........
IIRC, it was a 100 point FLOGGING :thumbsu:
And according to numerous sources Raines was not in the best players and Deledio IMO does influence the game in a manner such a talent, if he has any should.
Mundy > Deledio, not evn going to bother with Raines because we saw how he played against a foward willing to pu some pressure on. :thumbsu: He is a nuffy.
Check the ladder, then check who we played and who your mob played, and then check how you faired against that side........
IIRC, it was a 100 point FLOGGING :thumbsu:
And according to numerous sources Raines was not in the best players and Deledio IMO does influence the game in a manner such a talent, if he has any should.
Mundy > Deledio, not evn going to bother with Raines because we saw how he played against a foward willing to pu some pressure on. :thumbsu: He is a nuffy.
Oh dear *sigh*
How did Farmer go yesterday??
Raines = Very good Footballer
Everyone sees it except you. That would be beacuse of your lack of knowledge about AFL
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:08
well said
Angus Monfries > Mundy
Beat me to it
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:09
Check the ladder, then check who we played and who your mob played, and then check how you faired against that side........
IIRC, it was a 100 point FLOGGING :thumbsu:
And according to numerous sources Raines was not in the best players and Deledio IMO does influence the game in a manner such a talent, if he has any should.
Mundy > Deledio, not evn going to bother with Raines because we saw how he played against a foward willing to pu some pressure on. :thumbsu: He is a nuffy.
Monfries >> Mundy .... how do you like them apples ?
Punt_Road_Roar
12 Jun 2006, 18:11
"We are assured that when they looked at that scoreboard and realised the mess they had made of things yesterday, they were suitably aggrieved, and resolved to make sure it doesn't happen again.
Sound familiar?"
LMAO @ this last paragraph, so true about the Dockers since they joined the comp. :thumbsu:
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,19438610%255E19765,00.html
Check the ladder, then check who we played and who your mob played, and then check how you faired against that side........
IIRC, it was a 100 point FLOGGING :thumbsu:
And according to numerous sources Raines was not in the best players and Deledio IMO does influence the game in a manner such a talent, if he has any should.
Mundy > Deledio, not evn going to bother with Raines because we saw how he played against a foward willing to pu some pressure on. :thumbsu: He is a nuffy.
Come back to this at the close of the season. You will need the JAWS OF LIFE to pry your mouth open in the hope both your feet will come out:thumbsu:
Calcium Man
12 Jun 2006, 18:23
Fremantle Vs Bulldogs
Freo Best Players: Johnson, J Carr, D. Mundy
Mundy : 19 touches, 10 marks, 6 tackles.
Very impressive, quelled numerous forays foward, a significant impact on the game. :thumbsu:
Richmond Vs North Melbourne
Richmond Best Players: P Bowden, M Coughlan, K. Pettifer, J Bowden, A Kellaway, S. Tuck.
Deledio, 25 touches 11 marks, NO IMPACT :thumbsu:
10 came in the last quarter, game was over.
Raines 20 touches 6 marks NO IMPACT :thumbsu:
Mund > Raines and Deledio.
Mundy > Fab 5 how hilarious, fab 5 :thumbsu:
Well that proves it end of story, Mundy stands out in a loss to injury depleted doggies, lets not forget that half team was ill mid weak and looked out of legs in the last quarter!
Where as Brett contributes in a comfortable win where his entire team play well and doesnt get in the best!
Mundy must be better the Deledio based on this one game!! :rolleyes:
Pav for AA
12 Jun 2006, 18:33
Any other facts to present besides stats? And they really dont back you up at all. Heath Scotland is 3rd in the AFL for kicks. Going by your logic Scotland > Judd
Do you watch games on TV or go to the ground live???
No, I couldnt fly over to Melbourne, one of the constraints of being employed :thumbsu:
Scotland has played more games, surely you could have thought of somone better? Silly boy :thumbsu:
Punt_Road_Roar
12 Jun 2006, 18:35
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=112&pid2=2005090
How do you like them apples ? :thumbsu: Your arse poof ---> (o) :thumbsu:
speaking of pro-stats how did the worst disposal by foot ever in P.Haselby go this weekend? Did he hit many targets? Saw he had 15 kicks LMAO
:p
No, I couldnt fly over to Melbourne, one of the constraints of being employed :thumbsu:
Scotland has played more games, surely you could have thought of somone better? Silly boy :thumbsu:
If im not mistaken Fremantle have 12 games at Subiaco per year. Thats ample opportunity for you to deck yourself out in purple, and trudge off to subiaco as an oompa loompa, is it not???
Or are you required to work out who owns what rice on weekends :D :D
Pav for AA
12 Jun 2006, 18:36
Monfries >> Mundy .... how do you like them apples ?
Oh and those Apples http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=112&pid2=2004080
and these apples
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=105&pid2=2005039
Brain power of a common house brick :thumbsu:
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:39
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=112&pid2=2005090
How do you like them apples ? :thumbsu: Your arse poof ---> (o) :thumbsu:
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=105&pid2=2003025
Take a bite of those rotten apples :D
Oh and those Apples http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=112&pid2=2004080
and these apples
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=105&pid2=2005039
Brain power of a common house brick :thumbsu:
Nipper the size of a bees **** :D
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:40
I dont even think Pav for AA has been to a single game in his life to be honest.
Pav for AA
12 Jun 2006, 18:41
If im not mistaken Fremantle have 12 games at Subiaco per year. Thats ample opportunity for you to deck yourself out in purple, and trudge off to subiaco as an oompa loompa, is it not???
Or are you required to work out owns what rice on weekends :D :D
What? Prime example of the intelligence levels of a richmond supporter, keep trying cob, digger, sport, champ, skipper :thumbsu:
[/B]
What? Prime example of the intelligence levels of a richmond supporter, keep trying cob, digger, sport, champ, skipper :thumbsu:
Yes, change my posts there's no other way you can win this argument
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:43
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=105&pid2=200133
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=105&pid2=2004033
there you go sonnyjim, choke on those poisoned apples \o/
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:44
[/b]
What? Prime example of the intelligence levels of a richmond supporter, keep trying cob, digger, sport, champ, skipper :thumbsu:
How many games do you to Live at the ground sonny ? I'll safely predict 0 :D
Pav for AA
12 Jun 2006, 18:46
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/compare_players?tid1=106&pid1=2004040&tid2=105&pid2=2003025
Take a bite of those rotten apples :D
Why not sample these apples?
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/standings
Cretin :thumbsu:
Why not sample these apples?
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/standings
Cretin :thumbsu:
Pav, if you have the intelligence that you claim, surely you can notice a pattern here.
Not only Richmond, but opposition and Fremantle YES FREMANTLE supporters are dining out on your tripe??
Do you need me to read between the lines for you???
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:49
Why not sample these apples?
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/standings
Cretin :thumbsu:
And this ?
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/game_stats?mid=2005064
keep going champ, I am sure I can go all night long .... say how you really feel :D
Pav for AA
12 Jun 2006, 18:51
Pav, if you have the intelligence that you claim, surely you can notice a pattern here.
Not only Richmond, but opposition and Fremantle YES FREMANTLE supporters are dining out on your tripe??
Do you need me to read between the lines for you???
How about this, you had a thread deleted by moderators on BAY 13, that has to be some kind of record, your material is sub-par in both quality and insight.
And yes, I changed you original post :thumbsd:
Cretin :thumbsu:
Dining out or overwhelmed :thumbsu:
How about this, you had a thread deleted by moderators on BAY 13, that has to be some kind of record, your material is sub-par in both quality and insight.
And yes, I changed you original post :thumbsd:
Cretin :thumbsu:
Dining out or overwhelmed :thumbsu:
My My
You failed to see the point yet again
That is a ****poor reply if ever ive seen one
Big deal if a thread was removed??
and i think my material is just fine.
If you dont believe my, like i said do you need my to read between the lines. Supporters of all clubs continute to dine out on your rubbish :D
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:54
http://www.allthestats.com/team/teamvteam.php?t1=7&t2=5
hell, in WA the 2 clubs have played 7 times and Bombers have won 4. Clearly shows the better club over the last 10+ seasons.
http://www.allthestats.com/team/teamvteam.php?t1=7&t2=5
hell, in WA the 2 clubs have played 7 times and Bombers have won 4. Clearly shows the better club over the last 10+ seasons.
2003 1st QF was interesting :D
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 18:59
2003 1st QF was interesting :D
why yes it was. And Fremantle have only made the finals once in 11 seasons right since 1995 ?
Now lets see ...
Essendon - 9/11 seasons in the finals since 1995.
great stat that
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 19:00
hey Cogz, I think Pav for AA is getting a bit nervous. Most likely trying to look up some weird stat or something to get us back. He hasn't posted in a fair bit LOL
Pav for AA
12 Jun 2006, 19:02
And this ?
http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/game_stats?mid=2005064
keep going champ, I am sure I can go all night long .... say how you really feel :D
Your really grasping, quite sad really. :thumbsu:
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 19:03
Your really grasping, quite sad really. :thumbsu:
nothing in return ? figured as much, so any more stats ? you were gone for a while, couldn't find anything ? :D
Total Power
12 Jun 2006, 19:08
Guys, why do you bother feeding the troll??? he is not worth it.
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 19:09
Guys, why do you bother feeding the troll??? he is not worth it.
seemingly he has finished with his so called topline stats, and has nothing to come back with anymore. so seemingly he has stopped his dribble in this thread.
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 19:12
hehe the clown is offline, he finally worked out he lost on both counts and took his bat and ball and went home crying to mommy
hehe the clown is offline, he finally worked out he lost on both counts and took his bat and ball and went home crying to mommy
Your team is last this year. Mundy was good yesterday, he gets more of the ball than Deledio, you have irked other posters to question your motives.
You are just as bad as him.
Your team is last this year. Mundy was good yesterday, he gets more of the ball than Deledio, you have irked other posters to question your motives.
You are just as bad as him.
Oh look who surfaces
Mr im too good and smart for everyone else
pfft **** off ****er
MrAaron
12 Jun 2006, 19:22
Your team is last this year. Mundy was good yesterday, he gets more of the ball than Deledio, you have irked other posters to question your motives.
You are just as bad as him.
and who is the 1 that everyone is argueing at ? :thumbsu:
thankyou very much Mr 1 man team :D
and for the record Mundy << Poo
Oh look who surfaces
Mr im too good and smart for everyone else
pfft **** off ****er
You are certainly enhancing your reputation as an absolute tosser.
meltiger
12 Jun 2006, 21:14
Your team is last this year. Mundy was good yesterday, he gets more of the ball than Deledio, you have irked other posters to question your motives.
You are just as bad as him.
Is that right?
Pav's lover boy has had a total of 200 touches this year from 11 games.
Brett has had a total of 172 touches this year from 9.5 games (Remember, he was injured well before halftime in Round 9.
That would make the averages as follows:
Deledio 18.10 touches per game.
Mundy 18.18 touches per game.
So on average, Mundy touches the ball 0.08 times more than Brett during each game. Gee, big difference eh? Over 22 games that would equate to less than 2 touches more per season.
Now given Brett is 2 years younger :thumbsu: than Mundy, I'd suggest that people admit this Mundy>Deledio debate is nothing more than a figment of Pav's homosexual fantasies. Nothing more.
Deledio >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mundy
Is that right?
Pav's lover boy has had a total of 200 touches this year from 11 games.
Brett has had a total of 172 touches this year from 9.5 games (Remember, he was injured well before halftime in Round 9.
That would make the averages as follows:
Deledio 18.10 touches per game.
Mundy 18.18 touches per game.
So on average, Mundy touches the ball 0.08 times more than Brett during each game. Gee, big difference eh? Over 22 games that would equate to less than 2 touches more per season.
Now given Brett is 2 years younger :thumbsu: than Mundy, I'd suggest that people admit this Mundy>Deledio debate is nothing more than a figment of Pav's homosexual fantasies. Nothing more.
Deledio >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mundy
Would you like me to say he gets less of the ball?
Look, I rate Deledio, I reckon he will be a better player than Mundy, but at the moment they are hard to split.
Deledio has a great scope for improvement, he has pace, the leap and a good pair of hands.
Mund has the height, the leap and good skills both by hand and feet.
The difference between the two would probably be a belief thing, I mean if Deledio decided to tuck the ball under his arm a little more and Carry the ball more often Pav would have nothing.
And thats probably a result of the gameplan of the Tigers negating his running ability, the stop start chip chip footy doesnt really allow for Deledio to show his true asset, pace.
It would be interesting to see how Deledio would go in a running side ala the doggies or Melbourne, West Coast even.
But at the moment they are pretty level in terms of output.
I watched both gams on the Weekend, you couldnt split them, maybe Mundy had a greater influence.
I get to see all the Freo games over here and apart from a shocker against Hawthorn the boy is vey good.
Having said that in time Deledio has the scope for more improvement.
At the Moment Mundy = if not > Deledio.
meltiger
12 Jun 2006, 21:40
Would you like me to say he gets less of the ball?
I'd like you to retract your statement that Brett gets less of the ball ... If he hadn't been injured in a contest (Something Mundy knows nothing about as a HBF) in R9 he would have a higher average. Give it two weeks, he will have a higher average.
At the end of the day, Brett is 2 years younger than Mundy. The comparisons are utterly ridiclous. You may as well compare Mundy with Hodge/Ball/Judd and label him **** for not being at their level.
That's how silly this argument is.
I'd like you to retract your statement that Brett gets less of the ball ... If he hadn't been injured in a contest (Something Mundy knows nothing about as a HBF) in R9 he would have a higher average. Give it two weeks, he will have a higher average.
At the end of the day, Brett is 2 years younger than Mundy. The comparisons are utterly ridiclous. You may as well compare Mundy with Hodge/Ball/Judd and label him **** for not being at their level.
That's how silly this argument is.
Nope, Im not going to retract, I think you will dind that Mundy has had more of the ball before Deledios injury, but yes, the comparison is pretty ridiculous, Im out because apparently, Im Pav for AA :thumbsd: