View Full Version : Votes Rd 11 vs Carlton
Belgarion
11 Jun 2006, 20:17
5. Cousins (only one who had good 4 quarters)
4. Hunter
3. Embley
2. Kerr
1. Chick
I'll take any win, but for the second week in a row we have played *****house for 3 quarters. Carlton deserved to win the game.
Belgarion
JuddyisGod
11 Jun 2006, 21:11
5. Adam Hunter
4. Dean Cox
3. Daniel Chick
2. Andrew Embley
1. Matt Rosa
lol, just read the afl.com article on the game...
"Adam Hunter was the hero for the Eagles, kicking three of his four goals in the pulsating final term, while Michael Embley also lifted and kicked the final two goals of the match to secure the win."
That's quite an improvement on his WAFL reserves form.
5. Adam Hunter
4. Dean Cox
3. Quinten Lynch
2. Adam Selwood
1. Ben Cousins
A ripping last qtr by Banners too
Special Agent
11 Jun 2006, 21:28
5. Cousins
4. Hunter
3. Selwood
2. Chick
1. Cox
Gunnar Longshanks
11 Jun 2006, 23:08
No votes for Embley.
Definitely needs to do more.
Sure, he kicked the last two goals, but he missed a couple of sodas earlier, and his goals were the result of others' good work.
5. Hunter
4. Cousins
3. Cox
2. Selwood
1. Fletcher
RoJo was pretty good today. Lynch worked hard and finished with 3 important goals.
Gunnar Longshanks
11 Jun 2006, 23:12
Embley did SFA for most of the game.
Look at his 2 goals.
He got on the end of a handpass in the goalsquare, and then outmarked a smaller opponent once we were already in front.
Not even close to deserving votes.
Kerr wasn't great today either.
Selwood and Cox were more important.
Special Agent
11 Jun 2006, 23:15
No votes for Embley.
Definitely needs to do more.
Sure, he kicked the last two goals, but he missed a couple of sodas earlier, and his goals were the result of others' good work.
Completely agree.
West Coast 06
11 Jun 2006, 23:17
5. Hunter
4. Cox
3. Lynch
2. Banfield
1. Cousins
Very hard to give votes when the first half is so attrocious, most players only stood out for half a game or less!
embleygirl
11 Jun 2006, 23:17
5. Hunter
4. Cousins
3. Cox
2. Selwood
1. Chick
Special Agent
11 Jun 2006, 23:35
I'm starting to get frustrated with Embley. He does little for the first three quarters and then does some brilliant stuff in the last quarter. I'd like to see him show more for 4 quarters.
Chick was much more important up forward in the last quarter. His defensive pressure was unbelievable. Kicked one himself, set-up a few others including the goal to put us in front.
Something more...
11 Jun 2006, 23:38
5. Hunter
4. Cox
3. Chick
2. Cousins
1. Selwood
i didnt see the game but how can no carlton players feature in the votes they were up all day somethin must of been goin alright...
larrikin
11 Jun 2006, 23:52
i didnt see the game but how can no carlton players feature in the votes they were up all day somethin must of been goin alright...
It's an Eagles Player of the Year contest
Tough game to give votes....
5 - Hunter
4 - Selwood
3 - Wirrpanda
2 - Rosa
1 - Cox
wce4premiership
11 Jun 2006, 23:53
5. cox
4. cousins
3. fletcher
2. braun
1. hunter
The Made Guy
11 Jun 2006, 23:54
5. Hunter
4. Cox
3. Selwood
2. Cousins
1. Braun
5. Cousins
4. Hunter
3. Cox
2. Braun
1. Selwood
Honourable Menions to Rosa thought he was super when the majority of our players were pathetic in the first half and chick whose a star when he crashes the packs
Ruddiger
12 Jun 2006, 00:32
5. Hunter
4. Cousins
3. Cox
2. Selwood
1. Kerr
Rosa had a really good run and Graham and Lynch both did some good things
94_Eagles
12 Jun 2006, 00:36
5. Cousins
4. Hunter
3. Braun
2. Lynch
1. Wirrapanda
The Reaper
12 Jun 2006, 00:44
5. Cox
4. Hunter
3. Chick
2. Braun
1. Cousins
The Made Guy
12 Jun 2006, 01:20
It's an Eagles Player of the Year contest
Does anyone tally these votes up or work out an average?
(I'd volunteer to do it - but I can't access the votres from R1-R9.)
larrikin
12 Jun 2006, 01:28
Does anyone tally these votes up or work out an average?
(I'd volunteer to do it - but I can't access the votres from R1-R9.)
Yeah, Jod does it
He does tend to be a bit slack in spitting it out at the other end though - don't you Jod
Sir Razzle
12 Jun 2006, 02:44
After watching the match twice:
5 - Hunter (amazing, in defense, in attack and for 4 quarters)
4 - Wirrpanda (mopped up everything in defense, provided a spark for the comeback)
3 - Cousins (ran like mad, solid everywhere)
2 - Chick (hit the packs and players hard to turn the tide at the right time)
1 - Cox (terrific rucking, but fewer "hits to advantage" than normal)
Im shocked at some of these votes... I though Cousins was a pretty clear BOG for us?? Yet hasnt even made some of your votes at all??
5. Cousins
4. Braun
3. Hunter
2. Fletcher
1. Wirrpanda
Yeah, Jod does it
He does tend to be a bit slack in spitting it out at the other end though - don't you Jod
Yes ... yes I do :D
But most of the time its because i dont have the votes. I really must dedicate myself to getting you guys a ladder for the mid-season break then ill go underground for an exciting count at the end of the season.
Interesting season though so far, Cox early, Judd before injury, Cousins is coming back, Kerr is up there.
RoSa..RoX..4..eVa.S2
12 Jun 2006, 10:00
5 - Hunter
4 - Cousins
3 - Kerr
2 - Rosa
1 - Selwood
no1bankteller
12 Jun 2006, 10:26
No votes for Embley.
Definitely needs to do more.
Sure, he kicked the last two goals, but he missed a couple of sodas earlier, and his goals were the result of others' good work.
5. Hunter
4. Cousins
3. Cox
2. Selwood
1. Fletcher
RoJo was pretty good today. Lynch worked hard and finished with 3 important goals.
I do not get a vote as I have not been doing this from the start but I completely agree with what you have posted.
How amazing has Fletchers turnaround in form been? He is putting his body on the line and his kick have been far more accurate of late.
In addition to this I think Rosa needs a spell as his turnovers are getting worse. Did a couple of ordinary ones in the second quarter including a handball back into forward fifty that resulted in a Blues goal. I think an extended break will do him loads of good and it will give the coaches a chance to have a quiet word with him about his disposal.
no1bankteller
12 Jun 2006, 10:30
Im shocked at some of these votes... I though Cousins was a pretty clear BOG for us?? Yet hasnt even made some of your votes at all??
5. Cousins
4. Braun
3. Hunter
2. Fletcher
1. Wirrpanda
Yeah but Jod you have always had a soft spot for Cousins...:)
He did have an awesome game and if anyone needs to see how hard he works watch the last 5 minutes of that game. Cus had a ball deep in the backline. Kicked it virtually up the guts. Then ran the length of the field and marked it just outside of the fifty on the wing. I think that is the passage of play where he ended up kicking a goal. ALl I could say whilst watching it was you f.u.c.k.i.n.g champ
bassmanx
12 Jun 2006, 10:53
5. Cousins
4. Hunter
3. Cox
2. Wirrapanda
1. Braun
Unsure how Fletcher is getting any votes. I thought he was back to his disappointing best with his dodgy disposals.
hawkeye23
12 Jun 2006, 11:27
5. Hunter
4. Cousins - a quieter game, but still got the job done
3. Braun
2. Nicoski
1. Fletcher
Honourable mentions to Selwood, Banfield (could his shorts have gotten any bigger?), Rosa (what was with the commentator calling him Ross-a?) and Lynchy.
Kerr getting votes mystifies me somewhat :confused: What are you guys seeing that I'm not?
How cud people not give Lynchy a vote, 3 goals 2 behinds (one touched) 3 goal assists brilliant gathering of the ball and handballs........ Didnt to much wrong today.
5.Hunter
4.Lynch
3.Cousins
2.Wirrapanda
1.Jones
Magnum27
12 Jun 2006, 12:11
5 vts Hunter
4 vts Cousins
3vts Cox
2vts Selwood
1vt Lynch
Im shocked at some of these votes... I though Cousins was a pretty clear BOG for us?? Yet hasnt even made some of your votes at all??
I agree Cousins was inspirational.
5 - Cousins
4 - Hunter
3 - Chick
2 - Lynch
1 - Cox
eagleskickass
12 Jun 2006, 14:05
5 - Hunter
4 - Cousins
3 - Rosa
2 - Fletcher
1 - Rowan Jones
5. Cousins
4. Hunter
3. Cox
2. Selwood
1. Chick (did some tough work in the last qtr)
wce_all_da_way
12 Jun 2006, 16:28
5. Cousins
4. Hunter
3. Rosa
2. Selwood
1. Cox
Milkman
12 Jun 2006, 16:42
5. Cousins
4. Hunter
3. Wirrpanda
2. Chick
1. Selwood
Bestbird
12 Jun 2006, 17:02
5. Hunter
4. Cousins
3. Wirrapanda
2. Cox
1. Chick
imonebadddman
12 Jun 2006, 18:50
5. Hunter
4. Cousins
3. Cox
2. Selwood
1. Embley
nearlyblonde
12 Jun 2006, 19:27
5. HuntAAAAAAAA
4. Cousins
3. Wirrpanda
2. Chick
1. Selwood
Gunnar Longshanks
12 Jun 2006, 20:38
5. Hunter
4. Cousins
3. Cox
2. Selwood
1. EmbleyI guess everyone has their favourites.
CarlSpackler
12 Jun 2006, 21:37
5. Hunter
4. Cousins
3. Wirrpanda
2. Rosa
1. Braun
jorel6669
12 Jun 2006, 21:44
5. Adam Hunter
4. Daniel Chick
3. Ben Cousins
2. Quinten Lynch
1. Michael Braun
Goldenblue
12 Jun 2006, 22:16
5. Hunter.
4. Cousins.
3. Braun.
2. Cox.
1. Selwood.
Though would loved to have given Chick a vote. I thought his bullocking and determination was an integral part of the Eagles coming back.
sinepari
13 Jun 2006, 00:11
I can't believe Tim Gossage gave Chick the full votes on Ch 10's player of the year award.
He was good but not that good.
Gunnar Longshanks
13 Jun 2006, 01:09
5. Hunter
4. Cousins
3. Wirrpanda
2. Rosa
1. Braun5. Adam Hunter
4. Daniel Chick
3. Ben Cousins
2. Quinten Lynch
1. Michael BraunHow was Dean Cox not among our top 5?
Has he become a victim of his own high standards?
Or are the mob more clueless than ever?
A combination of both, perhaps.
I realise that some people have short memories.
Believe it or not, there was a time when 28 hit-outs and 22 disposals was an outstanding performance from a ruckman. But now that output doesn't even deserve a vote.
If Dean Cox had less impact than Braun, Chick, Wirrpanda and/or Rosa, then I was watching a different game.
You people need to get a clue.
larrikin
13 Jun 2006, 03:02
How was Dean Cox not among our top 5?
Has he become a victim of his own high standards?
Or are the mob more clueless than ever?
A combination of both, perhaps.
I realise that some people have short memories.
Believe it or not, there was a time when 28 hit-outs and 22 disposals was an outstanding performance from a ruckman. But now that output doesn't even deserve a vote.
If Dean Cox had less impact than Braun, Chick, Wirrpanda and/or Rosa, then I was watching a different game.
You people need to get a clue.
He was beaten by a crab in the first half - That's why people didn't give him votes
mudgeathon
13 Jun 2006, 03:14
5: Hunter
4: Cousins
3: Lynch
2: Cox
1: Braun
bassmanx
13 Jun 2006, 12:45
How was Dean Cox not among our top 5?
Has he become a victim of his own high standards?
Or are the mob more clueless than ever?
A combination of both, perhaps.
I realise that some people have short memories.
Believe it or not, there was a time when 28 hit-outs and 22 disposals was an outstanding performance from a ruckman. But now that output doesn't even deserve a vote.
If Dean Cox had less impact than Braun, Chick, Wirrpanda and/or Rosa, then I was watching a different game.
You people need to get a clue.
Big call coming from someone who gave Fletcher votes.
The Made Guy
13 Jun 2006, 15:47
2. Nicoski
Nicoski?
ROLF!
I've got him in my SuperCoach team, so I was watching him intently. He kicked a nice trademark goal, but was very quiet overall. Couple of bad clangers too.
Just my opinion though. :)
Clayton
13 Jun 2006, 16:15
5 Hunter
4. Cuz
3. Cox
2. Wirra
1. Braun
hawkeye23
13 Jun 2006, 16:19
Nicoski?
ROLF!
I've got him in my SuperCoach team, so I was watching him intently. He kicked a nice trademark goal, but was very quiet overall. Couple of bad clangers too.
Just my opinion though. :)
Who died and morphed you into Gunnar? :p
In all honesty, we were shyte for 3 and a half quarters, and giving votes to anyone but Hunter and Cousins is a joke.
Gunnar Longshanks
13 Jun 2006, 17:49
Big call coming from someone who gave Fletcher votes.Fletcher was actually OK.
He worked very hard all day and came a up a notch in the second half.
Still coughed it up a few times, but 1 vote is hardly excessive praise.
Having watched the game a couple of times, I probably could have given that vote to Chick, but Fletcher wasn't as far out of the frame as your post suggests.
bassmanx
13 Jun 2006, 17:57
Fletcher was actually OK.
He worked very hard all day and came a up a notch in the second half.
Still coughed it up a few times, but 1 vote is hardly excessive praise.
Having watched the game a couple of times, I probably could have given that vote to Chick, but Fletcher wasn't as far out of the frame as your post suggests.
He makes me flinch every time he gets the ball lately.
You just know he's fire off a handball to a man under pressure.
He did it a few times this week.
I thought Braun was a worth a vote before Fletch.
The Made Guy
13 Jun 2006, 19:43
My votes were almost worth a 1-vote, jeez they were good.
Fletchers Girl
13 Jun 2006, 23:21
5 - Cousins
4 - Cox
3 - Hunter
2 - Fletcher
1 - Wirra
Goldenblue
14 Jun 2006, 00:21
How was Dean Cox not among our top 5?
Has he become a victim of his own high standards?
Or are the mob more clueless than ever?
A combination of both, perhaps.
I realise that some people have short memories.
Believe it or not, there was a time when 28 hit-outs and 22 disposals was an outstanding performance from a ruckman. But now that output doesn't even deserve a vote.
If Dean Cox had less impact than Braun, Chick, Wirrpanda and/or Rosa, then I was watching a different game.
You people need to get a clue.
GL, can you please refrain from being critical of other posters votes and just stick to yours thanks. Go ahead and debate the issue, but back off the name calling and the insults.
Everyone has their own view of the game and are entitled to vote what ever way they wish. What you think is right may not be everyone elses idea.
Cheers GB.
Thrawn666
14 Jun 2006, 00:23
I thought your boyfriend Braun was a worth a vote before Fletch.
Juvenile yet incredibly amusing :D
larrikin
14 Jun 2006, 00:54
GL, can you please refrain from being critical of other posters votes and just stick to yours thanks. Go ahead and debate the issue, but back off the name calling and the insults.
Everyone has their own view of the game and are entitled to vote what ever way they wish. What you think is right may not be everyone elses idea.
Cheers GB.
That is such a cute kid
Good point and all that stuff
Magnum27
14 Jun 2006, 11:09
GL, can you please refrain from being critical of other posters votes and just stick to yours thanks. Go ahead and debate the issue, but back off the name calling and the insults.
Everyone has their own view of the game and are entitled to vote what ever way they wish. What you think is right may not be everyone elses idea.
Cheers GB.
Well said everbody sees things differently, while some peoples votes baffle me as well. It is there opinion and they are entitled to it.
peterss
14 Jun 2006, 12:54
5. Hunter
4. Chick
3. Cousins
2. Wirrpanda
1. Cox
nob2210
14 Jun 2006, 15:57
5: Selwood
4: Cousins
3: Cox
2: Banfield
1: Chick
Blues_Man
14 Jun 2006, 21:20
5. Hunter
4. Cousins - a quieter game, but still got the job done
3. Braun
2. Nicoski
1. Fletcher
Honourable mentions to Selwood, Banfield (could his shorts have gotten any bigger?), Rosa (what was with the commentator calling him Ross-a?) and Lynchy.
Kerr getting votes mystifies me somewhat :confused: What are you guys seeing that I'm not?
Hawkeye I can't believe you have left out 3 vital cogs in your teams win on the weekend ...here's my take on the voting :
5 Cousins ran all day
4 Hunter good both ends of the ground
3 Rosebury stepped up when needed
2 Margetts there when the pressure was on
1 Hendrie sterling effort when the game was in the balance
:D
(ps this is meant to be humourous )
hawkeye23
14 Jun 2006, 21:24
Hawkeye I can't believe you have left out 3 vital cogs in your teams win on the weekend ...here's my take on the voting :
5 Cousins ran all day
4 Hunter good both ends of the ground
3 Rosebury stepped up when needed
2 Margetts there when the pressure was on
1 Hendrie sterling effort when the game was in the balance
:D
(ps this is meant to be humourous )
Makes up for us being anally raped by Kennedy and Wenn in the past. It's all karma Blues Man :p
pauljam
15 Jun 2006, 00:24
5 - Huntaaaa
4 - Cuz
3 - Cox
2 - Lynchy
1 - Fletch
Gunnar Longshanks
15 Jun 2006, 00:37
It is there opinion and they are entitled to it.Equally, other people are entitled to disagree.
Criticism and debate are not against the rules.
Goldenblue
15 Jun 2006, 18:15
Equally, other people are entitled to disagree.
Criticism and debate are not against the rules.
Criticism of posters are.
Just refrain from personal comments thanks.
GB.