PDA

View Full Version : The "same players again" theory


Embers
11 Jun 2006, 22:24
Is a big pile of crap

Last week Kerr Nicoski Cousins Embley led the comeback

This week it was Hunter Chick Cox and Banners in the last qtr.

wce4premiership
11 Jun 2006, 23:57
Is a big pile of crap

Last week Kerr Nicoski Cousins Embley led the comeback

This week it was Hunter Chick Cox and Banners in the last qtr.

this week it was cousins and embley again (along with chick).

it is our 3 fittest players imo that get the job done ussually these being: cousins, embley and kerr and then one or two others that step up

section8
12 Jun 2006, 00:18
this week it was cousins and embley again (along with chick).

it is our 3 fittest players imo that get the job done ussually these being: cousins, embley and kerr and then one or two others that step up

Although I don't doubt they are among the fittest players in the side, they didn't seem to break much of a sweat for the first three quarters as per the Geelong game.

94_Eagles
12 Jun 2006, 00:30
The most talented/best players come to the fore when the game is on the line.

What's crap about that?

wce4premiership
12 Jun 2006, 00:51
Although I don't doubt they are among the fittest players in the side, they didn't seem to break much of a sweat for the first three quarters as per the Geelong game.

cousins first half = good effort
3rd qtr = shyt
last qtr = fine

embleys first half = shyt
2nd half = good

kerr was alright for the last half as well but not with the other 2

jod23
12 Jun 2006, 04:21
I dont think its the same players... it is when we talk about Cousins though. He always lifts when we need him to. This week it was a bunch of different players that stood up in the last quarter. Either way it shouldnt be happening anyway, we shouldnt have to come back from large margins like that. It's frustrating.