Bee
17 Jan 2002, 11:06
Just curious to know what others think about how juvenile offenders are dealt with in the justice system.
I have just returned from victim/offender mediation.
I was as nervous as I have probably ever been at any time in my life. Until I walked into the room and sitting at the desk accompanied by a social worker, was a scrawny, pathetic, scared $hitless child.
I decided on the meditation option in the first place because after hearing about his background I felt sorry for him and thought he deserved a second chance.
Apparently he was taken from his mother, a drug addict, who couldn’t care for him and was in and out of foster homes most of his life. He has been on the streets since he was 9 years old and started using drugs at around 11. He can barely read and write, which is obviously why he couldn’t read that the autograph on the number 7 jumper was Wayne Johnston and not Brett Ratten!
After hearing that, I didn’t think locking him up in a juvenile detention centre would help him, in fact I thought it would probably harm him more.
So I just wondered what you all think. Should we be sending young offenders to juvenile centres or should there be another avenue in dealing with them and trying to help them?
BTW the mediation was quite good. After the first tentative 10 minutes he started to realise that I wasn’t there to rant and rave or abuse him and he talked openly and honestly and even apologised (sincerely).
On talking to him I discovered he isn’t a bad kid, he isn’t a criminal and he deserved the second chance. Whether or not he uses that to his advantage is now up to him. If he doesn’t then I can’t help him any more either.
Another thing though, if he had taken part in the break in, if he had been one of the lot that smashed my house up there is no way in hell I would have agreed to mediation.
I couldn’t have sat across from the same table as that lot and remained calm.
But even after all that today, he still didn’t give me the names or the whereabouts of those that were responsible. He could have at least been that grateful!
I have just returned from victim/offender mediation.
I was as nervous as I have probably ever been at any time in my life. Until I walked into the room and sitting at the desk accompanied by a social worker, was a scrawny, pathetic, scared $hitless child.
I decided on the meditation option in the first place because after hearing about his background I felt sorry for him and thought he deserved a second chance.
Apparently he was taken from his mother, a drug addict, who couldn’t care for him and was in and out of foster homes most of his life. He has been on the streets since he was 9 years old and started using drugs at around 11. He can barely read and write, which is obviously why he couldn’t read that the autograph on the number 7 jumper was Wayne Johnston and not Brett Ratten!
After hearing that, I didn’t think locking him up in a juvenile detention centre would help him, in fact I thought it would probably harm him more.
So I just wondered what you all think. Should we be sending young offenders to juvenile centres or should there be another avenue in dealing with them and trying to help them?
BTW the mediation was quite good. After the first tentative 10 minutes he started to realise that I wasn’t there to rant and rave or abuse him and he talked openly and honestly and even apologised (sincerely).
On talking to him I discovered he isn’t a bad kid, he isn’t a criminal and he deserved the second chance. Whether or not he uses that to his advantage is now up to him. If he doesn’t then I can’t help him any more either.
Another thing though, if he had taken part in the break in, if he had been one of the lot that smashed my house up there is no way in hell I would have agreed to mediation.
I couldn’t have sat across from the same table as that lot and remained calm.
But even after all that today, he still didn’t give me the names or the whereabouts of those that were responsible. He could have at least been that grateful!