View Full Version : Shane, Simone threaten to sue over alleged new sex scandal
In Paul Barry's unauthorised biography he claims that Shane has slept with over 1000 women and cheated on Simone just a few weeks into their marriage. She's angry and plans to sue, as does he. The suggestion on Seven news was that maybe the other players' wives have ratted on him. Not to mention some of the women involved with Shane.
Browney2006
29 Jul 2006, 18:13
For **** sake Romeo this is the cricket section not Who ****ing weekly
Is Warney suing because the number is an under-estimation??? :D:D
A mate of mine saw him up a bird out the back of a club once.
The amount of stories that used to go around before he busted up with his missus, it would have to be 5000.
Simone doesn't mind the publicity I bet.
Cooldude
29 Jul 2006, 18:42
Hmmm, so Warnie's done a Carey before?
He's not a patch on Wilt Chamberlain.
May have nudged ahead of Georgie Best by now though.
Cooldude
29 Jul 2006, 18:47
The quality of the chicks Georgie Best had banged (He's made a visit to every annual Miss World back then) would be way ahead of Warnie's
Hmmm, so Warnie's done a Carey before?
Actually I know a journo who said that the cricket journos and footy ones were chatting in the office one day about the extra-curricula activities of sportsmen and came to the conclusion that Warnie made Carey look like a virgin.
This below on the Paul Barry book which hits the bookstores on Tuesday.
Spun Out, The Shane Warne Story, Paul Barry’s much-anticipated biography of the scandal-plagued cricketer, will be delivered to bookshops this month, with an official release date of August 1.
It is understood the book reveals much about his childhood and his sex life.
Warne’s camp told associates to have nothing to do with Barry’s research but the author of books on Alan Bond and Kerry Packer is said to have new details of Warne’s womanising, as well as examining how being favoured as a child on the basis of his talent shaped the man he is today.
Warne, 36, is shown in the book “to be incredibly generous one minute and incredibly selfish the next”, according to a publishing insider.
A source close to the recordbreaking leg spinner claims Barry hired a private investigator to look into the cricketer’s life and that people such as old teachers and school friends received “endless calls” associated with the book.
Cooldude
29 Jul 2006, 18:54
I don't think anything Paul Barry said was untrue and deserves suing
Warnie is indeed just a big attention seeking spoilt child who is two faced and selfish (Only generous when it suits him), it's proven that he's a serial liar. He should not be treated like a 38 year old, his mindset's that of an 18 year old, he's immature. Anyone who tries to judge him with logic, common sense and mature thinking are way off, he's an adult in age only
Mind you, that has nothing to do with anything as he's the greatest bowler most of us have ever seen
I don't think anything Paul Barry said was untrue and deserves suing
Warnie is indeed just a big attention seeking spoilt child who is two faced and selfish (Only generous when it suits him), it's proven that he's a serial liar. He should not be treated like a 38 year old, his mindset's that of an 18 year old, he's immature. Anyone who tries to judge him with logic, common sense and mature thinking are way off, he's an adult in age only
Mind you, that has nothing to do with anything as he's the greatest bowler most of us have ever seen
In the extract it makes reference to Simone being considered by those who know her as particularly thick and naive. Maybe she genuinely believes he is not the philanderer he is portrayed to be. When interviewed on the news she reacted with a sense of disbelief that he could have cheated a couple of weeks into their marriage. She obviously is very ignorant of cricket culture. Barry also suggests that these blokes' mates mean more to them than any girl could so the cone of silence will always protect them. To win respect you have to be either a great cricketer or a great casanova. In Warne's case he hit the jackpot both times.
Cooldude
29 Jul 2006, 20:17
Thick and naive? Again true statement, thick to not realise her husband's a ****, and naive to think he would change for her or she could change him
Mind you, when Warnie goes senile and his tool can't be used any longer, he'd realise how stupid he is to tear apart a wonderful wife and two lovely kids. But that's expecting him to mature, which he won't. He's fast heading for the George Best type ending
Mind you, that has nothing to do with anything as he's the greatest bowler most of us have ever seen
Which is how most cricket fans see him.Apart from women who like to portray him as a bastard, but like Carey would probably be all over him in person, and the poms who don't and have never had a bowler of similar ilk so therefore in the common nature of their press focus on his off field behavior to 'find a way to bring him down', most of us view him as the best leg spinner of all time and the current leading wicket taker of all time.
dan warna
30 Jul 2006, 11:19
Which is how most cricket fans see him.Apart from women who like to portray him as a bastard, but like Carey would probably be all over him in person, and the poms who don't and have never had a bowler of similar ilk so therefore in the common nature of their press focus on his off field behavior to 'find a way to bring him down', most of us view him as the best leg spinner of all time and the current leading wicket taker of all time.
peiterson is the closest thing the entire bunch of nobs the brits have in their side to having a personality
peiterson is the closest thing the entire bunch of nobs the brits have in their side to having a personality
Well I'd say Phil Tufnell was the closest thing.Since Pietersen is a South African, he probably doesn't count as a "Brit".
eddiesmith
30 Jul 2006, 11:48
Wow with all this **** about Warney you would almost believe that he is the only cricketer who does it :rolleyes:
Be interesting if any team mates said anything, one player was kicked out of the Australian team for 5 years for telling his wife what happened on a tour
Ice goddess
30 Jul 2006, 12:33
Wow with all this **** about Warney you would almost believe that he is the only cricketer who does it :rolleyes:
Be interesting if any team mates said anything, one player was kicked out of the Australian team for 5 years for telling his wife what happened on a tour
Matthew Elliott?
Also women might portray him as a bastard but there must be a lot of 'cheap tarts' out there willing to accommodate him so they are just as 'sleazy' as him in my book. Let's not have double standards.
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/07/30/30n_warne2RHS,0.jpg (http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/sex-claims-put-wife-in-spin/2006/07/29/1153816426860.html)
Jill Stark
July 30, 2006
SHANE Warne's estranged wife says she will sue the author of a book that claims the spin bowler has had sex with 1000 women and had an affair just months after the couple married.
Simone Callahan, who reverted to her maiden name last month and is divorcing her husband after a series of humiliating sex scandals, said Paul Barry's unauthorised biography "discredited" her marriage. She told Channel Seven, the TV network which hired her on Dancing With The Stars, that she would talk to her solicitor tomorrow.
The book, Spun Out, also claims that Warne has propositioned women for sex within a minute of meeting them, and that a culture of "what goes on tour stays on tour" prevails among a misogynistic Australian cricket team.
Barry also alleges Warne had an affair four months after his 1995 wedding when he picked up a French backpacker on Bondi beach.
Barry, who wrote a biography of Kerry Packer, said claims of Warne's infidelity were nothing new: "The books will be in the store on Tuesday and if they sue, we'll defend it."
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/07/30/30n_warne2RHS,0.jpg (http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/sex-claims-put-wife-in-spin/2006/07/29/1153816426860.html)
Hmmm.
She's much improved (just) on the early photo's that made her the deadest of dead give aways as an everyday anonymous girl from the inner suburbs.S'pose his dough was good for something nevertheless.But as much as I say that, she didn't deserve the treatment even if she was staying with him for the sake of the kids (aka being on a good 'wicket', so to speak).
It seems somewhat stupid to sue, they're falling into the usual trap, "someone says something bad about me, so I'll vigourously defend it." Only to further publicize the book and if they get to court (no doubt they'd be wanting a settlement, Barry would want it in court) they have even more great Warney shagging stories brought out.
I guess now Simone does have to live up to her newly acquired "strong woman" tag, as given to her by New Idea or Woman's Day (which ever one 7 owns) and Channel 7. :rolleyes: