daddy_4_eyes
1 Feb 2002, 09:38
Have a read of this (http://thegame.thewest.com.au/20020201/afl/news/tg-afl-new-sto42369.html) !
Some quotes:
West Coast, which made a $3 million profit, returned $2.4 million to the WAFC. But Fremantle finished 2001 with a loss of about $1.8 million.
Yet they write this:
"While West Coast have been fantastic in meeting their obligations, their return wasn't up to projections , while Fremantle just didn't meet expectations," Bradshaw said.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The eagles made a $3mln profit in one of their worst seasons ever, yet are being criticised along the same lines as freo? We are being blamed for the cost cutting? Now *** me sidesways if i'm wrong here, but aren't the eagles the only reason the WAFC and Freo aren't falling deeper and deeper into dept?
I think its about time the WAFC acknowledge the monetary contributions the eagles have made to their incompetent organisation, and more importantly its time the WAFC dealt with freo.
Some quotes:
West Coast, which made a $3 million profit, returned $2.4 million to the WAFC. But Fremantle finished 2001 with a loss of about $1.8 million.
Yet they write this:
"While West Coast have been fantastic in meeting their obligations, their return wasn't up to projections , while Fremantle just didn't meet expectations," Bradshaw said.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The eagles made a $3mln profit in one of their worst seasons ever, yet are being criticised along the same lines as freo? We are being blamed for the cost cutting? Now *** me sidesways if i'm wrong here, but aren't the eagles the only reason the WAFC and Freo aren't falling deeper and deeper into dept?
I think its about time the WAFC acknowledge the monetary contributions the eagles have made to their incompetent organisation, and more importantly its time the WAFC dealt with freo.