View Full Version : The worst bottom two?
DynamoUltra
27 Aug 2006, 23:27
I thought it would be interesting to rate the bottom two sides of the last few years as I believe Carlton and Essendon, this year, are as bad as any two sides in recent history (five years). Of course, this is partly speculative given there is one game left in 2006 for these teams to improve their record. Here are your options;
2002: Carlton (16th: 3 wins, 12 points, 73.13%) and St. Kilda (15th: 5 wins, 1 draw, 22 points, 78.60%)
2003: Western Bulldogs (16th: 3 wins, 1 draw, 14 points, 74.49%) and Carlton (15th, 4 wins, 16 points, 66.72%)
2004: Richmond (16th: 4 wins, 16 points, 69.24%) and Hawthorn (4 wins, 16 points, 70.23%)
2005: Carlton (16th: 4 wins, 1 draw, 18 points, 75.51%) and Collingwood (5 wins, 20 points, 77.69%)
2006: Carlton (16th: 3 wins, 1 draw, 14 points, 76.66%) and Essendon (15th: 3 wins, 1 draw, 14 points, 81.65%).
fishbowl
27 Aug 2006, 23:34
Co-Holder of wooden spoons go to Essendon and Carlton. GO SWANS!! If ever there was a god he would make the Swans lose.
Essendon is the Supertanker.
celtic_pride
27 Aug 2006, 23:44
The 2004 Tiger / Hawk double
Easily :)
Bombers1234
27 Aug 2006, 23:54
In 2001 fremantle only won one game if im not mistaken
DynamoUltra
27 Aug 2006, 23:57
In 2001 fremantle only won one game if im not mistaken
Two. And I'm not including that year because it would be a no contest :)
The Dice Man
27 Aug 2006, 23:59
Hahaha @ Carlton finishing bottom 2 every year for the last 5 years, except 1.
Seriously how funny is that?:D
DynamoUltra
28 Aug 2006, 01:34
Hahaha @ Carlton finishing bottom 2 every year for the last 5 years, except 1.
Seriously how funny is that?:D
The salary cap penalties didn't help, but in the future, no one is going to remember that.
celtic_pride
30 Aug 2006, 00:49
Hahaha @ Carlton finishing bottom 2 every year for the last 5 years, except 1.
Seriously how funny is that?:D
Not as Funny as Richmond have been in the last 25 years :D
I'll also take 16 premierships over 10.
Monkeyboy
30 Aug 2006, 10:18
Hawks/Tigers definately. They were really poor teams!
Barnsey3150
30 Aug 2006, 12:22
Richmond & Hawthorn easily
The Dice Man
30 Aug 2006, 12:46
Richmond & Hawthorn easily
Funny stuff. I recall we won more games than your rabble this year... so did Hawthorn.
So by virtue of that fact, your worse... much, much worse considering we had Frawley.
Back Pocket Rocket
30 Aug 2006, 13:07
In a year that Schwabby proclaimed that we were a chance for the flag we were freaking terrible. We had one of the oldest lists and got our asses handed to us on a platter most weeks. God that year sucked!
The salary cap penalties didn't help, but in the future, no one is going to remember that.
paying kouta close to a million per year didn't help that
Barnsey3150
30 Aug 2006, 13:57
Funny stuff. I recall we won more games than your rabble this year... so did Hawthorn.
So by virtue of that fact, your worse... much, much worse considering we had Frawley.
Wow you won half a game more that year then us this year and the session isn't even over yet. Essendon were alot more competitive then Hawthorn & Richmond back then.