View Full Version : best player out of these three
rick James
31 Aug 2006, 17:09
All likely to be up for trade at the end of the year, which of htese three players, do you think has the most trade value?
Now there have been rumours about some players this year, potentially taking bad substances. I just want to point out that this poll has nothing to do with those rumours.
Vote away.
Personally, I think Polak has the most to offer.
Vulture_72
31 Aug 2006, 17:18
Very interesting choice of players. I'd take Polak.
goal sneak
31 Aug 2006, 17:20
Polak has the most value, gardiner is the best player. Which are you asking?
Lightning_Rod
31 Aug 2006, 17:28
this poll is treading awefully near a very very bad area, ill leave it at that.
rick James
31 Aug 2006, 17:29
Why, because the season isn't yet over and I'm already discussing potential trades?
Babe Ruth
31 Aug 2006, 17:43
Although Thurstans is tall he runs hard and really 'breaks the lines', as for Polak now that Fremantle have a 'sniff' of premiership glory he will most likely lift. Former No.1 draft pick Michael Gardiner has been hampered by chronic knee injuries and supposedly has to take several 'injections' just to make it through a game. So i would say Polak.
Lightning_Rod
31 Aug 2006, 17:46
Why, because the season isn't yet over and I'm already discussing potential trades?
yes thats why :confused: maybe because of what you refered to in your opening post, if u had no intention of that then why mention it?
rick James
31 Aug 2006, 17:51
yes thats why :confused: maybe because of what you refered to in your opening post, if u had no intention of that then why mention it?
to make it clear it has nothing to do with this thread
delirious1
31 Aug 2006, 17:53
depends, i think polak is the most valuable out of them three
gandaal
31 Aug 2006, 18:03
Polak but that's not saying much. Gardiner is a ruckman who can't ruck and Toby Thurstans is Toby Thurstans.
Lightning_Rod
31 Aug 2006, 18:04
to make it clear it has nothing to do with this threadbut to people who are oblivious to the possible people then they would have been none the wiser, this is why i didnt wanna get into it, sorry i shouldnt have said anything.
rick James
31 Aug 2006, 18:15
but to people who are oblivious to the possible people then they would have been none the wiser, this is why i didnt wanna get into it, sorry i shouldnt have said anything.
I agree, between us we've now made it patently obvious what's going on. I'm probably banned now. Thanks. :)
Lightning_Rod
31 Aug 2006, 18:20
I agree, between us we've now made it patently obvious what's going on. I'm probably banned now. Thanks. :)
sorry RJ that wasnt my intention lol, im sure they will be ok
just take out that line in the first post and i can delete my posts in here and the world is fine :D
bunsen burner
31 Aug 2006, 18:24
Polak has the most value, gardiner is the best player. Which are you asking?that's pretty much how it is.
TizzaBlues
31 Aug 2006, 18:29
Polak, no idea why he has barely got a game this year.
Vulture_72
31 Aug 2006, 18:35
Polak, no idea why he has barely got a game this year.
Yeah me either, aparently he is out of favour with the coach, not really sure whats going on.
Coin_Toss
31 Aug 2006, 18:51
Im tempted but better keep quiet.
No comment.
Polak, no idea why he has barely got a game this year.
Injuries, playing strongly in the WAFL at present.
With Freo doing well, he has been unable to dislodge any players.
Although Thurstans is tall he runs hard and really 'breaks the lines', as for Polak now that Fremantle have a 'sniff' of premiership glory he will most likely lift. Former No.1 draft pick Michael Gardiner has been hampered by chronic knee injuries and supposedly has to take several 'injections' just to make it through a game. So i would say Polak.
Surprised this thread is still going. Polak would be the only one who'd get much interest, but I'm not sure my club can afford to trade away picks after doing so for Hay/Thommo in the last 2 years.