Richmond vs West Coast Teams [Archive]

pettifers.sexy

31 Aug 2006, 21:48

RICHMOND v WEST COAST
Saturday, 2:10pm AEST, MCG

RICHMOND
B: Raines, J.Bowden, Chaffey
HB: Hyde, Schulz, P.Bowden
C: Deledio, Tuck, Tambling
HF: Pettifer, Pattison, Tivendale
F: Krakouer, Richardson, Stafford
FOLL: Simmonds, Johnson, Foley
I/C: Polo, White, Roach, Howat
EMG: McGuane, Kellaway, Humm
IN: Roach
OUT: Hall (suspension)

WEST COAST
B: Selwood, Glass, Graham
HB: Waters, Hunter, Banfield
C: Butler, Cousins, Braun
HF: Stenglein, Staker, R.Jones
F: Armstrong, Lynch, Chick
FOLL: Cox, Judd, Fletcher
I/C: B.Jones, LeCras, Rosa, Seaby
EMG: Hurn, Morton, Sampi
IN: Armstrong, Rosa, LeCras
OUT: Embley (AC joint), David Wirrpanda (hamstring), Sampi

Crumden

31 Aug 2006, 21:57

HB: Hyde, Schulz, P.Bowden

I know I'm in the minority, but I hope that's where they play the sarge. He needs to be played somewhere where he's going to get a lot more of the ball than he is at the moment.

Darth_Tiger

31 Aug 2006, 22:35

i agree crumden. lets see what he can do down back.

peternorth

31 Aug 2006, 22:58

i can see sarge as a CHB, but i love the way he launches himself for balls in the forward lines while spliting the pack open.

does he have the discipline for a CHB?

prettyboy

31 Aug 2006, 23:07

Hopefully we bring AK in for someone and he can play CHB

Madtiger2006

1 Sep 2006, 00:50

schultz has averaged 2 goals a game this year. He is doing a good job up forward and will get better and better

PHX

1 Sep 2006, 10:08

Why Roach would come in ahead of AK is beyond me.

jezza

1 Sep 2006, 10:35

Looks like we'll probably be forced to play Schulz back, if the Eagles get on top in the middle, they could load up their forward line with Lynch, Staker, Seaby, Cox, Graham, would be very easy to stretch us. For those wondering how we're going to be positioned if we get rid of Gaspar and Kellaway, welcome to a sneak peak.

turtle27

1 Sep 2006, 11:44

Looks like we'll probably be forced to play Schulz back, if the Eagles get on top in the middle, they could load up their forward line with Lynch, Staker, Seaby, Cox, Graham, would be very easy to stretch us. For those wondering how we're going to be positioned if we get rid of Gaspar and Kellaway, welcome to a sneak peak.But it also gives more weight to the Polak trade rumour doesn't it.

jezza

1 Sep 2006, 11:59

But it also gives more weight to the Polak trade rumour doesn't it.

Maybe. But Polak in and Gaspar & Kellaway out doesn't balance the ledger, especially given we were short to begin with...

turtle27

1 Sep 2006, 15:53

Maybe. But Polak in and Gaspar & Kellaway out doesn't balance the ledger, especially given we were short to begin with...remember that Will is more or less a new recruit next year. I guess the expectation is for him to step up, and with Polak maybe coming in, there's your replacements. Otherwise I'm assuming they believe McGuane is ready for a regular spot.

Infamy

1 Sep 2006, 22:19

remember that Will is more or less a new recruit next year. I guess the expectation is for him to step up, and with Polak maybe coming in, there's your replacements. Otherwise I'm assuming they believe McGuane is ready for a regular spot.
Rubbish, Will will be like a new recruit in 2008, 2007 will be a recovery year as it always takes a solid 12 months to get your form back, especially a knee as bad as his was.