PDA

View Full Version : Didak v O'Keefe v Pettifer

SouthSwans
11 Sep 2006, 20:07
Who would you prefer?
Jeremias
11 Sep 2006, 20:14
ROK>>>Didak>>>>>>>>>>Petifer
Cassius_Clay
11 Sep 2006, 20:20
ROK>>>Didak>>>>>>>>>>Petifer
Very true.

O'Keefe and Didak are close, O'Keefe slightly better. Pettifer is nowhere near both.
Jeremias
11 Sep 2006, 20:29
Very true.

O'Keefe and Didak are close, O'Keefe slightly better. Pettifer is nowhere near both.

Correct.

Amazing, we actually agree on something :p
parrot
11 Sep 2006, 20:29
Very true.

O'Keefe and Didak are close, ....

I guess it depends on whether you can tolerate a big-game hand-breaker. On that basis I'd exclude Didak (see yesterdays game). :)
Jeremias
11 Sep 2006, 20:29
Very true.

O'Keefe and Didak are close, O'Keefe slightly better. Pettifer is nowhere near both.

Then why did you vote Didak?
Cassius_Clay
11 Sep 2006, 20:32
Then why did you vote Didak?
Haha, cos I wanted too :D
Jeremias
11 Sep 2006, 20:37
Haha, cos I wanted too :D

LOL.

Had to keep him close, didn't you!

:p :D :thumbsu:
davey_magik
11 Sep 2006, 20:43
Didak just over O'Keefe. O'Keefe is a better mark but Didak IMO beats him in all other areas and is more likely to win a match off his own boot.
Pettifer is a much improved player and also a better mark than Didak, but doesn't come close in foot skills.
AntiX
11 Sep 2006, 20:53
Didak and O'Keefe are around the same. Coz O'keefe plays further up the ground so doesnt need to be kicking as many goals with Hall there.

Comparing Pettifer next to these 2?!?!?!?!?! :eek:
vinnie_vegas69
11 Sep 2006, 22:40
Well, the All-Australian selectors have spoken - Didak = O'Keefe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pettifer
Big Nasty
11 Sep 2006, 22:59
O'Keefe although Chapman ahead of Pettifer
jonesy86
11 Sep 2006, 23:24
didak.okeefe................................................ ............................................................ ............................................................ ............................................................ ............................................................ ............................................................ ............................................................ ............................................................ ............................................................ ............................................................ ............................................................ .................................................pettifer
SouthSwans
14 Sep 2006, 22:21
O'Keefe >>>>>> Didak >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pettifer
is2SWaNz
14 Sep 2006, 22:42
O'Keefe>Didak> [times 10000]...>>>>>> Pettifer.

And ROK is more good looking! :D
natlovestheswans
14 Sep 2006, 22:46
O'Keefe>Didak> [times 10000]...>>>>>> Pettifer.

And ROK is more good looking! :D

Exactly, just look at the man. Definately ROK.
nicky
14 Sep 2006, 22:55
Who would you prefer?

ROK in a heartbeat. I actually rate didak, he can be an exciting player for the pies and i do have a softspot for explosive players like didak and aker however ROK is a modest champion.! :thumbsu:
Traffic Light
15 Sep 2006, 08:09
Pettifer doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as the other 2.