PDA

View Full Version : Psd


kelvin_sheedy
12 Sep 2006, 11:33
Who are the likely candidates that we might pick up in the PSD.

Rischettelli is gone I believe. Any others out there?

blumfieldisback
12 Sep 2006, 14:20
polak or kade simspson??? there's not many left because there mostly signing and staying home. I think Moody from the lions is also out of contract. I think we are losing our market value, we cant seem to woo any youngsters with money it doesnt sound good for our club.

and if newspapers are correct we will probably miss out on aker too, why couldn't we miss out on campo.

DaSawx
12 Sep 2006, 14:23
Polak looks to be our best bet atm, can't see Kade Simpson leaving Carlton, would be nice though, he's got some nice skills

go_the_bombers
12 Sep 2006, 14:33
Can't see Freo lettin Polak go for nothing! If he did go into the PSD Carlton would pick him up before us

FootyGuru
12 Sep 2006, 14:36
Can't see Freo lettin Polak go for nothing! If he did go into the PSD Carlton would pick him up before us

apparently they are keen on gardiner but they probly wouldnt waste pick one in the psd for him. polak would be a great get i think we should try and trade for him before the psd cos its unlikely he would reach us there. dunno what wed trade maybe 3rd round or 2nd round pick and soloman or something. hed fill all our problems at chb has a huge scope for improvement is young and can take a contested grab.

DaSawx
12 Sep 2006, 14:37
Can't see Freo lettin Polak go for nothing! If he did go into the PSD Carlton would pick him up before us

They may be after Gardiner, they're desperate for a ruckman. Would anyone trade Laycock for Kade Simpson?, just hypothetical, can't see Carlton doing it anyways

go_the_bombers
12 Sep 2006, 14:51
They may be after Gardiner, they're desperate for a ruckman. Would anyone trade Laycock for Kade Simpson?, just hypothetical, can't see Carlton doing it anyways

What about Laycock 4 pick 17 ;) :p

troybond
12 Sep 2006, 15:16
What about Laycock 4 pick 17 ;) :p


Keep dreaming Simo is untouchable!!!!!!!!!!!! Although we do have lappin and Kouta who are over 30 and in keeping with the last few years you'll have them in a heartbeat.:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

jules101
12 Sep 2006, 15:31
Keep dreaming Simo is untouchable!!!!!!!!!!!! Although we do have lappin and Kouta who are over 30 and in keeping with the last few years you'll have them in a heartbeat.:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
lol trade you henneman and reynolds for them ok? keeping with the last few years:rolleyes: (Bannister, McGrath)

troybond
12 Sep 2006, 15:34
lol trade you henneman and reynolds for them ok? keeping with the last few years:rolleyes: (Bannister, McGrath)

Ha. Got more value out of them than you with (Allan,Murphy).:eek:

go_the_bombers
12 Sep 2006, 15:34
lol trade you henneman and reynolds for them ok? keeping with the last few years:rolleyes: (Bannister, McGrath)

LOL thats a fair trade :p

go_the_bombers
12 Sep 2006, 15:35
Ha. Got more value out of them than you with (Allan,Murphy).:eek:

Murphy & Allen got us into the finals what have Bannister & McGrath done?

troybond
12 Sep 2006, 15:37
Murphy & Allen got us into the finals what have Bannister & McGrath done?

Well they gave us Murphy and also this year Gibbs!!:thumbsu:

DaSawx
12 Sep 2006, 15:38
Murphy & Allen got us into the finals what have Bannister & McGrath done?

they helped fill 22 positions with "footballers"

troybond
12 Sep 2006, 15:38
Being serious now. Is Laycock(don't know bout the spelling) still uncontracted??

DaSawx
12 Sep 2006, 15:39
Being serious now. Is Laycock(don't know bout the spelling) still uncontracted??

at the moment yes

troybond
12 Sep 2006, 15:41
at the moment yes

So we could snag him in the psd. Well that's better than Drugner!

DaSawx
12 Sep 2006, 15:42
So we could snag him in the psd. Well that's better than Drugner!

he's a very good player and would hate to lose him for nothing, I have a feeling he'll re-sign

go_the_bombers
12 Sep 2006, 15:44
at the moment yes

Anyone know what the sticky point is with the negoations? Is it money, the length of the contact or both?

go_the_bombers
12 Sep 2006, 15:45
he's a very good player and would hate to lose him for nothing, I have a feeling he'll re-sign

I hope he does re-sign

Slattery_20
12 Sep 2006, 15:55
as do I
real tap ruckmen don't grow on trees

Merv
12 Sep 2006, 17:52
real tap ruckmen don't grow on trees

But big trees have tap roots :eek:

Vulture_72
12 Sep 2006, 18:12
Would Essendon look at Jason Cloke?

Frankencow
12 Sep 2006, 18:16
Would Essendon look at Jason Cloke?
Essendon needs about 36 picks to replace the duds they have now. They'd probably look at Cloke, but they'd probably also look at bringing back Doug Hawkins for another AFL run, or in fact probably any player from the Donald Under 18s. They could train monkeys to play better football than their current list. Grant Thomas is doing nothing next year, give him a try at Centre Half Back.

mcphee_is_a_gun
12 Sep 2006, 18:17
I think we should have a look at Aaron Edwards.

Vulture_72
12 Sep 2006, 18:18
Essendon needs about 36 picks to replace the duds they have now. They'd probably look at Cloke, but they'd probably also look at bringing back Doug Hawkins for another AFL run, or in fact probably any player from the Donald Under 18s. They could train monkeys to play better football than their current list. Grant Thomas is doing nothing next year, give him a try at Centre Half Back.
You don't belong here! Ban him!

Nuts4Bolts
12 Sep 2006, 18:22
I think we should have a look at Aaron Edwards.

Isn't he a full forward?

Merv
12 Sep 2006, 18:27
Essendon needs about 36 picks to replace the duds they have now. They'd probably look at Cloke, but they'd probably also look at bringing back Doug Hawkins for another AFL run, or in fact probably any player from the Donald Under 18s. They could train monkeys to play better football than their current list. Grant Thomas is doing nothing next year, give him a try at Centre Half Back.

And you beat us by........ how much again?

jules101
12 Sep 2006, 18:37
Essendon needs about 36 picks to replace the duds they have now. They'd probably look at Cloke, but they'd probably also look at bringing back Doug Hawkins for another AFL run, or in fact probably any player from the Donald Under 18s. They could train monkeys to play better football than their current list. Grant Thomas is doing nothing next year, give him a try at Centre Half Back.
it pains me to say this but go dees :p

mcphee_is_a_gun
12 Sep 2006, 18:41
Isn't he a full forward?
he wouldn't be at AFL level. FP or HFF.

windyhill
12 Sep 2006, 18:51
Essendon needs about 36 picks to replace the duds they have now. They'd probably look at Cloke, but they'd probably also look at bringing back Doug Hawkins for another AFL run, or in fact probably any player from the Donald Under 18s. They could train monkeys to play better football than their current list. Grant Thomas is doing nothing next year, give him a try at Centre Half Back.
How about Jimmy Krakouer ?

jodo27
14 Sep 2006, 10:09
Hawks have been in Laycocks ear offering double what we have. Won't get him however unless they are offering their 1st draft pick for him.

Why would we want a hack like Jason Cloke. He can't mind a man in defence is unable to play forward and is slow and unco-ordinated. Why would we want any clokes for that matter

Slattery_20
14 Sep 2006, 12:18
Isn't he a full forward?
Not at 6'1" he ain't - he's not Mark Williams.

Essendon needs about 36 picks to replace the duds they have now. They'd probably look at Cloke, but they'd probably also look at bringing back Doug Hawkins for another AFL run, or in fact probably any player from the Donald Under 18s. They could train monkeys to play better football than their current list. Grant Thomas is doing nothing next year, give him a try at Centre Half Back.
Does the number 1 mean anything to you? Like, say, the exact total number of pieces of silverware your great club owns? You're jsut getting worked up because your meandering, aimless club has wasted 3 years. Again. Wake up to yourself. It's not our fault that your club doesn't care about winning. Get a clue dude.
Prat

bossco
14 Sep 2006, 21:24
[quote=Slattery_20]Not at 6'1" he ain't - he's not Mark Williams.

Interestingly Edwards played CHB in the WAFL when he was at west coast. Now kicks 100 in the VFL. at 184cm he's the same height as McVeigh so you'd want to hope he has some pace and run.