The real superdraft. 2000 draft vs 2001 [Archive]

Broady Poker Tour

12 Sep 2006, 13:01

Everyone talks about the 2001 "superdraft" but after doing some research, I think it can be argued that the 2000 draft would actually produce a more superior team.

Here are players I've selected for the respective teams- the number the player was drafted is in brackets.

2000 Draft Team

Full Backs: G. Johncock (67) T. Richards (27) J. McMahon (10)

Half Backs: A. McPhee (39) J Koschitzke (2) S. Burgoyne (12)

Centres: D. Harris (14) M. Couglan (25) L. Ablett (24)

Half Forwards: D. Petrie (23) N. Reiwoldt (1) A. Didak (3)

Full Forwards: A. Buchanon (52) M. Williams (43) Ash. McGrath (13)

Rucks: J. Charman (29) D. Kerr (18) K.Cornes (20)

Interchange from: S. Thompson (16), J. Hunt (44), K.Pettifer (9), D. Cassisi (50), W. Skipper (70), R. Lonie (34), G. Richards (37), J. Cloke (19)

2001 Draft Team

Full Backs: C. Brown (32) B. Harris (71) X. Clarke (5)
Half Backs: L. Hodge (1) M. Macguire (21) J. Gram (19)
Centre: N. Dal Santo (13) L. Ball (2) J. Bartel (8)

Half Forwards: L. Montagna (37) B. Miller (55) A. Sampi (6)

Full Forwards : S. Johnson (24) J. Waite (46) G. Ablett Jnr (40)

Rucks: D. Hale (7) S. Mitchell (36) C. Judd (3)

Interchange from: A. Welsh (47), M. Seaby (22), P. Medhurst (56), G. Polak (4), A, Hansen (38), D. Swan (58), A. Sneider (60), J. Kelly (17)

Cassius_Clay

12 Sep 2006, 13:18

2000 > 2001

Cynic

12 Sep 2006, 13:20

Team 2000 would not see the ball from the centre of the ground.

Kenny_01

12 Sep 2006, 14:47

What about 1999?

B: B Johnson Glass Whelan
HB: Bruce McPharlin Gilbee
C: Bateman Hasleby Giansiracusa
HF: O'Keefe J Brown Green
F: Chapman Pavlich Fraser

R: Hille Corey Ling

I: Hunter Enright R Murphy Hargrave

E: Biglands Hahn P Bowden

The spine is unreal.

Gooka

12 Sep 2006, 15:01

Dang the dogs did well that draft. Gian, Hahn, Murphy and Gilbee.

Williams02

12 Sep 2006, 15:54

2001>2000

Richo83

12 Sep 2006, 17:26

Maybe the 2000 draftees are better than the 2001 draftees because they have had one more year in the system. Just as thought.

It's like saying the 2003 draft is better than the 2004 draft, probably because one has played for 3 years compared to two.

Kenny_01

12 Sep 2006, 18:32

Maybe the 2000 draftees are better than the 2001 draftees because they have had one more year in the system. Just as thought.

It's like saying the 2003 draft is better than the 2004 draft, probably because one has played for 3 years compared to two.

Yeah, but the 2001 draft have had 5 years in the AFL system. Should have been long enough to determine if they can play or not.

The Joker

14 Sep 2006, 20:37

Glass
McPharlin
Hasleby
J Brown
Pavlich

You could give the other two 5 years and they still will not be as good as that goal to goal line

goal sneak

18 Sep 2006, 13:55

2003 draft will be the best

B Raines Mundy H.Shaw
HB Walker C.Bolton S.Fisher
C Cooney Tuck Peake
HF Ray Bradley Sylvia
F Waters Ry.Murphy Butler
R Hudson McLean Stanton
I Tenace R.Dunn Moody Symes Adcock C.Johnson Chaplin Rischitelli Moloney

Nightwolf

18 Sep 2006, 14:11

2003 draft will be the best

B Raines Mundy H.Shaw
HB Walker C.Bolton S.Fisher
C Cooney Tuck Peake
HF Ray Bradley Sylvia
F Waters Ry.Murphy Butler
R Hudson McLean Stanton
I Tenace R.Dunn Moody Symes Adcock C.Johnson Chaplin Rischitelli Moloney

In: Bradley Sewell..

ptrain8

18 Sep 2006, 14:27

Glass
McPharlin
Hasleby
J Brown
Pavlich

You could give the other two 5 years and they still will not be as good as that goal to goal line

Stop creaming over it its just that 3 of those guys play for the Dockers.

Look at how many ended up in the Saints best 22 from the 01 draft..