PDA

View Full Version : Lowest talent team to make a finals series


parrot
13 Sep 2006, 21:57
For me it's a tossup between the current Collingwood side and Essendon 2004. :)

Keithy George
13 Sep 2006, 22:11
Melbourne 2005 - shouldn't have been there

Jeremias
13 Sep 2006, 22:13
Melbourne 2005 - shouldn't have been there

So why didn't you vote for them?

Neutral_observer
13 Sep 2006, 22:20
Carlton 2000

jonesy86
13 Sep 2006, 22:21
richmond 2001 and kangaroos 2005

Keithy George
13 Sep 2006, 22:27
So why didn't you vote for them?

Done

melbournemartin
13 Sep 2006, 22:39
Essendon was far from impressive in 04....until they beat us *cries*

Melbourne 05 had the list that warrented a 6-8 spot I reckon. This years list warrents anywhere from 3 to 8 so we did alright getting 7th and a win first up.

CarnthePies
13 Sep 2006, 22:43
Why is Collingwood 2002 and 2003 there? I swear both those teams got into the Grand Final those years.

Ripper
13 Sep 2006, 22:44
For me it's a tossup between the current Collingwood side and Essendon 2004. :)

You are probably right. Both sides made the finals on the back of incredibly soft draws.

jonesy86
13 Sep 2006, 22:49
You are probably right. Both sides made the finals on the back of incredibly soft draws.

if you are basing this on teams with soft draws then without doubt it would be Sydney 2006 considering they are reigning premiers they had the easiest draw you could imagine

Total Power
13 Sep 2006, 22:59
Adelaide 2001 :)

Drummond
13 Sep 2006, 23:00
Adelaide 2001 :)
What a surprise...

RoosterLad
13 Sep 2006, 23:09
Adelaide 2001 :)



Love is in the air....

Port last year would be my vote. To lose a Showdown Final by a record margin, that is just disgraceful.

Total Power
13 Sep 2006, 23:18
Am i getting stalked now? sorry rooster i am not a girl, sorry to dissappoint you :)

Southerntakeover
13 Sep 2006, 23:19
Debatable.





I think Port last year were incredibly lucky to be there. 11 1/2 wins shouldnt get you into the finals series.

Divado
13 Sep 2006, 23:22
Debatable.





I think Port last year were incredibly lucky to be there. 11 1/2 wins shouldnt get you into the finals series.

And they still flogged the roos by 80 points. lol @ kangaroos

Drummond
13 Sep 2006, 23:35
Debatable.
:p :thumbsu:

lihei
13 Sep 2006, 23:44
For me it's a tossup between the current Collingwood side and Essendon 2004. :)
Another dumbass poll from a sad little Blues supporter. http://www.iconator.com/ikons/784/ICONATOR_8a9702a209e2fbc448af2ebc55dbe621.gif

Thrawn
13 Sep 2006, 23:49
Another dumbass poll from a sad little Blues supporter. http://www.iconator.com/ikons/784/ICONATOR_8a9702a209e2fbc448af2ebc55dbe621.gif

Your icon sucks.

yulong
14 Sep 2006, 11:13
Melbourne 2005 - shouldn't have been there

Not on talent. On mental toughness and fitness/ability to run out the season yes but talent wise we had a good list. Not much has changed. We were in awsome form for the first half off the season.

Best answer is Carlton: Wiz Cup
Unbelieveable even in a second rate insignificant competition.

Funkalicous
14 Sep 2006, 12:42
Without doubt, it's gotta be Essendon in 2004. They played something like a dozen opponents that were in the bottom 4 at the time. Unbelievable!

augie
14 Sep 2006, 13:26
Pretty obvious what the intent of the poll is - run down the Pies again. Putting the 2002 and 2003 Collingwood sides in there is an indication of what a sad little person you are. FWIW this year's pies side is not flash, but certainly better than the Roos last year and a few others.

SA HAWK
14 Sep 2006, 21:26
Kangaroos 2005

Leg_Spinning_Sensation
14 Sep 2006, 21:29
Why is Collingwood 2002 and 2003 there? I swear both those teams got into the Grand Final those years.
I could have sworn that too, and the fact that we almost knocked off the best side arguably to ever play the game in the '02 GF :)

Belly
14 Sep 2006, 21:33
Geelong in 2000 finished 5th after home and away and were begining to re-build. They would have to be up there.

gormanisahack
14 Sep 2006, 21:57
its gotta be the kangaroos in 2005...how that team is not included in this poll is fairly ridiculous.

celtic_pride
14 Sep 2006, 22:43
Diff is between the Roos of 05 and Pies of 06 is that the Roos have an unbelieveably rare talent in Daniel Wells (although he has yet to delieve on that potential) wheras as the Pies, umm, ahhh ... soft draw, no injuries, tribunal leninent on them (except for Brodie Holland), feral culture ...

Buddhy
16 Sep 2006, 12:14
Kangaroos last year. Collingwood from that list (06).

dave_27
16 Sep 2006, 16:46
Without doubt, it's gotta be Essendon in 2004. They played something like a dozen opponents that were in the bottom 4 at the time. Unbelievable!

I thought this poll was about "talent", not who beat who.

Otherwise how did Essendon win their first final based on your logic?

Barnsey3150
18 Sep 2006, 13:12
I thought this poll was about "talent", not who beat who.

Otherwise how did Essendon win their first final based on your logic?

Agreed

TigerGlory
18 Sep 2006, 15:07
richmond 2001 and kangaroos 2005

LOL, third on the ladder and you say we didnt deserve it?

Typical from a Pies supporter.