View Full Version : haselbys replacement
who do you reckon should replace haselby
polak,medhurst or murphy ,as far as im concerned murphy should be a walk up starter,even with haselby in the side i would make room for murphy.even at the expense of jlo.
Yello Mit
13 Sep 2006, 22:44
Webster.
Parry St.
14 Sep 2006, 00:23
hey westy1. I'm with yellow mit. Webster got 18 posessions last time we played Melbourne. Also, showed he had a bit when we were embarrassed by Essendon in debut final. Him or Murph.
docker_azza
14 Sep 2006, 09:55
Either Murphy or Webster.
Webster was our best player in the 2003 EF and has been in good form for us recently.
Murphy would be a better and more confident replacement than Medhurst.
as good afootballer webster is i just think murphy provides a better foreward target and gives good strong, strait leads therefore staitening up our attacking moves through the guts.one of haselbys unsung strengths is his marking up foreward hence thought behind my selection.
thebigboy
14 Sep 2006, 15:47
From an outsiders point of view, webster and murphy should clash for his spot, although a player like polak could come in handy for you guys, especially if someone like carrol for melbourne is out
Needs to be Webby or Murphs! Either one will provide a forward option and Webster could be crucial with his delivery into the 50!
Needs to be Webby or Murphs! Either one will provide a forward option and Webster could be crucial with his delivery into the 50!
Murphy and Webster in.
Hase and Schammer out
pinkus maximus
14 Sep 2006, 17:42
i am off the schammer bandwagon for th time being and would like webster to come in
murphy for hase