View Full Version : Who has been better over the course of their career: David Neitz or Fraser Gehrig?
I think this is an interesting comparison. Both played back earlier in their careers and then moved to full forward. Similar ages and number of games. Similar body shapes. Who has had the better career? Which would you have chosen for your team the past 10 years given the chance?
Mr Hard Ball Get
15 Sep 2006, 12:24
I might be a little biased but given Neitz has been a captain for a number of years and is known for his inspirational leadership he would have to be better
carltonfan43
15 Sep 2006, 12:48
neitz has been good his whole career. fraser only came good about 3-4 years ago
delirious1
15 Sep 2006, 14:38
Neitz is a legand of melbourne
Gherig is the guy with the mullet
celtic_pride
15 Sep 2006, 14:41
Well I voted for G-Train even if only to be an neutral observer about it all ...
:)
Barnsey3150
15 Sep 2006, 15:58
Did you create this poll because you already knew the answer ?
Neitz is better compared to Gehrig but thats Gehrig ! haha!
Neitz is more important to Melbourne then Gehrig is too Stkilda.
davey_magik
16 Sep 2006, 18:31
Clearly Neitz.
vinnie_vegas69
16 Sep 2006, 18:50
Neitz by a fair bit.
Gehrig was more talented in the beginning, but had some pretty horrific injuries. Neitz has had his share too, but I'd say Gehrig's probably hurt him more.
Bourky23
16 Sep 2006, 19:07
neitz... but i'd rather the g-train atm neitz has been **** for 3-4 years where as fraze has just about been the best FF
Mr Hard Ball Get
16 Sep 2006, 23:02
neitz... but i'd rather the g-train atm neitz has been **** for 3-4 years where as fraze has just about been the best FF
your an idiot
melbournemartin
16 Sep 2006, 23:10
Neitz had an injury interupted season last year but his year this year has been better than Gerhigs.
windyhill
17 Sep 2006, 19:33
Silly question. Neitz is a champion. Gehrig is very very good.
danzan22
17 Sep 2006, 20:14
neitz has been better for his whole carrea, fraser only became good 3 years ago