PDA

View Full Version : WCE trade for Fisher


Johnny_3
24 Sep 2006, 16:15
I was thinking about the whole Brad Fisher scenario and thought about what kind of team could use a great marking forward with a bit of pace... WCE came to mind, who do you think we could get in terms of midfielders or gun players to the club.

I'm thinking along the lines of fletchers braun waters hunter etc... wouldnt mind throwing in pick 19

Kaitsey
24 Sep 2006, 16:16
um no thanks. fisher is good, but not worth any of those players.

wires on fire.
24 Sep 2006, 16:18
have hunter, we don't need him.

nibbles
24 Sep 2006, 16:37
who do you think we could get in terms of midfielders or gun players to the club.

in order to get a gun, you'd have to give us a gun - fisher is no gun

could provide us with some versatility, but we couldnt guarantee him a game

you'd probably be lucky to get gardy or doogs or wooden for him i reckons

Kaitsey
24 Sep 2006, 16:38
have gardy, doogs, wooden, gaspar and....our 3rd pick?

Johnny_3
24 Sep 2006, 16:49
in order to get a gun, you'd have to give us a gun - fisher is no gun

could provide us with some versatility, but we couldnt guarantee him a game

you'd probably be lucky to get gardy or doogs or wooden for him i reckons
hmm need an in and under player and you guys imo need another marking forward. I definently think he would get a game, if we threw in pick 17 and fisher what would we get?

sydney eagle
24 Sep 2006, 17:34
hmm need an in and under player and you guys imo need another marking forward. I definently think he would get a game, if we threw in pick 17 and fisher what would we get? Laughed at !

weztee
24 Sep 2006, 18:04
have hunter, we don't need him.

as if we dont need hunter hes a strong marker upforward which we need and a good backman

Stereophonic
24 Sep 2006, 18:05
I dont think Carlton need to be trading mate. I think youre club will go down the Kid Road. Fisher is part of Carltons plans surely
:mad:

nibbles
24 Sep 2006, 18:28
hmm need an in and under player and you guys imo need another marking forward. I definently think he would get a game, if we threw in pick 17 and fisher what would we get?


fisher & pick 17 for gardiner and fletcher... i'd do it, who knows how that would go down though

Gunnar Longshanks
24 Sep 2006, 19:35
I was thinking about the whole Brad Fisher scenario and thought about what kind of team could use a great marking forward with a bit of pace... WCE came to mind, who do you think we could get in terms of midfielders or gun players to the club.

I'm thinking along the lines of fletchers braun waters hunter etc... wouldnt mind throwing in pick 19Why are people laughing at this guy?

I'd be pretty happy to trade Chad Fletcher for Brad Fisher and pick 19.

That would be an excellent deal for WC.

3Judd3
24 Sep 2006, 20:31
have hunter, we don't need him.


Yeah I guess yesterday showed we don't need Hunter

:thumbsd: Stupid comment if you ask me

Kaitsey
24 Sep 2006, 20:39
as if we dont need hunter hes a strong marker upforward which we need and a good backman

HAHAA i cant beleive you actually took him seriously. hes joking man.

Kaitsey
24 Sep 2006, 20:39
Yeah I guess yesterday showed we don't need Hunter

:thumbsd: Stupid comment if you ask me

same goes for you.

Quinz
24 Sep 2006, 20:45
Erm, I think "Have hunter, we don't need him" refers to 'him' being Fisher. :)

wce_all_da_way
24 Sep 2006, 20:45
HAHAA i cant beleive you actually took him seriously. hes joking man.

It's not that he's joking it's that he means we don't need Fisher because we have Hunter

Embers
24 Sep 2006, 20:49
Erm, Its Grand Final week. Can we put Trade talk on halt for a week incl. opposition supporters too

nibbles
24 Sep 2006, 21:44
hehe - its not like its a busy week for us, yeah the players have other fish to fry - but i think we plebs can discuss a few hypotheticals to pass the time ;)

Kaitsey
24 Sep 2006, 21:48
It's not that he's joking it's that he means we don't need Fisher because we have Hunter

nah he means we dont need hunter, hes joking.

juDDa
25 Sep 2006, 01:12
fisher is too much like staker and he cant get a game for us atm..
can everyone tell me everytime a trade talk comes up everyone gives fletch away!!!
he gets his 20 or so touches every week while giving judd n cousins a rest on the bench.. he is like a back up midfielder and a bloody good one at that.. he doesnt get the ball for no reason! he works har to get to the right space and is a good footballer.. his disposal lets him down at times, but then again so does judd's..
give him a break

Ruddiger
25 Sep 2006, 02:40
I was thinking about the whole Brad Fisher scenario and thought about what kind of team could use a great marking forward with a bit of pace... WCE came to mind, who do you think we could get in terms of midfielders or gun players to the club.

I'm thinking along the lines of fletchers braun waters hunter etc... wouldnt mind throwing in pick 19

Yep - Fletcher and our first round pick for Fisher would be a good deal.

Gunnar Longshanks
25 Sep 2006, 11:05
Yep - Fletcher and our first round pick for Fisher would be a good deal.He's offering Fisher and their first-round pick for Fletcher.

That's a very good deal for WC.

Frizzo
25 Sep 2006, 11:46
Very good, but will never happen.

Stock92
25 Sep 2006, 11:49
have hunter, we don't need him.

mate if it werent for hunter u guys wouldnt be in the granny

nibbles
25 Sep 2006, 11:49
throw in gardiner? may still never happen, but it evens it up for the blues...

nibbles
25 Sep 2006, 11:51
mate if it werent for hunter u guys wouldnt be in the granny

rofl

this is an interesting sociological experiment on how many different ways the same sentence can be interpreted - im going out on a limb here and suggesting he doesnt want to get rid of hunter, but was saying we have hunter - therefore dont need fisher...

come on wires on fire - put us all out of our misery