Red Hot Trade Rumours ... Stanton Gawn ... [Archive]

Lukazzz777

3 Oct 2006, 17:03

DaSawx

3 Oct 2006, 17:05

your sourse is soooo hot she's a dumb blonde

TGR

3 Oct 2006, 17:05

Bender The Offender

3 Oct 2006, 17:06

Trade 2
Brisbane - aker to dogs
Dogs - cross to ess
Ess - Stanton to Bris[/quote]

no way that will happen
SOURCE???

deled3

3 Oct 2006, 17:06

Cant imagine giving up a top pick for Goddard..and using it to move on Bradshaw..

Also how does getting Essendon involved change the Aker deal?? What is the point of involving Stanton?

Belly

3 Oct 2006, 17:06

Carlton won't give up top pick, the first trade is BS.

The second one dosn't seem to unlikely even though Dogs/Dons fans will say "we'd never give up Stanton/Cross." I'd say that the second one won't happen, about 98% sure about it, but the first one has no chance.

Bender The Offender

3 Oct 2006, 17:06

your sourse is soooo hot she's a dumb blonde

good one:thumbsu: :D ;)

Doggy

3 Oct 2006, 17:06

my source is red hot, but I still can't believe this:

Trade 1
everitt to saints, goddard to carlton, #1 pick to saints who trade pick to Brisbane for Bradshaw, Bradshaw to Hawthorn.
Trade 1
Hawks - in Bradshaw - out everett
Saints - in everitt - out goddard
Carlton - in Goddard - out top pick
Brisbane - in top pick - out bradshaw

Trade 2
Brisbane - aker to dogs
Dogs - cross to ess
Ess - Stanton to Bris

Nice. You've made an ass of yourself. Cross is contracted and doesn't want to leave, from the horse's mouth. Goddard just re-signed . Strike 2. And it was reported today Everitt is most likely to go to Sydney . Strike 3:rolleyes:

Lukazzz777

3 Oct 2006, 17:08

Nice. You've made an ass of yourself. Cross is contracted and doesn't want to leave, from the horse's mouth. Goddard just resigned . Strike 2. And it was reported today Everitt is most likely to go to Sydney . Strike 3:rolleyes:

If you read what I wrote, I said that I too don't belive this crap. But the source I got it from has come up with the goods in the past...

Bender The Offender

3 Oct 2006, 17:08

Cant imagine giving up a top pick for Goddard..and using it to move on Bradshaw..

Also how does getting Essendon involved change the Aker deal?? What is the point of involving Stanton?

exactly
also bulldogs are losing cross for aker thats stupid

HBF

3 Oct 2006, 17:09

No way Carlton would give up #1 pick for Goddard when we could have persuaded him not to sign with the Saints and got him for nothing in the PSD.

chelsworthgale

3 Oct 2006, 17:10

my source is red hot, but I still can't believe this:

Trade 1
everitt to saints, goddard to carlton, #1 pick to saints who trade pick to Brisbane for Bradshaw, Bradshaw to Hawthorn.
Trade 1
Hawks - in Bradshaw - out everett
Saints - in everitt - out goddard
Carlton - in Goddard - out top pick
Brisbane - in top pick - out bradshaw

Trade 2
Brisbane - aker to dogs
Dogs - cross to ess
Ess - Stanton to Bris

He must be taking the pi$$ on trade 1... trade 2 looks a little realistic but I don't think the Dons will deal off Stanton... Maybe Dyson J Johnson or Pevrill...

dipper86

3 Oct 2006, 17:11

This is really bad.

Runknisse

3 Oct 2006, 17:12

He must be taking the pi$$ on trade 1... trade 2 looks a little realistic but I don't think the Dons will deal off Stanton... Maybe Dyson J Johnson or Pevrill...

I was just about to say replace Stanton with Johnson.

Thewlis Dish

3 Oct 2006, 17:13

So St Kilda effectively trade Goddard for Everitt, while giving up a shot at Bryce Gibbs in the process? Hilarious.

Lukazzz777

3 Oct 2006, 17:14

So St Kilda effectively trade Goddard for Everitt, while giving up a shot at Bryce Gibbs in the process? Hilarious.

Hey I am with you all in that it seems like total crap... Posted it just in case ...

chelsworthgale

3 Oct 2006, 17:14

I was just about to say replace Stanton with Johnson.

haha I am quick :p

Johnson seems more realistic... to be honest losing cross wouldnt be too bad for the dogs. They seem to have all these guys who are roughly the same ie: gilbee hahn hardgraves cross ray griffen not sayin that is a bad thing!

Green_Street

3 Oct 2006, 17:14

Cannot believe Carlton fans complaining about Goddard for Pick 1 how bout us we pretty much trade Goddard for Everitt but in saying that the whole trades just plain bs

Gilly1972

3 Oct 2006, 17:16

Cannot believe Carlton fans complaining about Goddard for Pick 1 how bout us we pretty much trade Goddard for Everitt but in saying that the whole trades just plain bs

Exactly green, that was my first thought, St Kilda couldn't possibly be daft enough to agree to that

Ramma

3 Oct 2006, 17:18

Cannot believe Carlton fans complaining about Goddard for Pick 1 how bout us we pretty much trade Goddard for Everitt but in saying that the whole trades just plain bs
Simplified, it could be:

Everitt -> StKilda
Goddard -> Carlton
Thornton -> Hawthorn

Anyone??

ausfatcat

3 Oct 2006, 17:18

so effectively the saints swap a 22 old player starting to rise and has 8 years left in him, for a 32 old wanning player with 2 years tops?

Not even the saints are that stupid....

The Zebra

3 Oct 2006, 17:19

Hey I am with you all in that it seems like total crap... Posted it just in case ...

Just in case everyone would believe it and then it would come true??

You're an idiot.

BTW - if you want some real news, I heard than Sammy mitchell wants out at Hawthorn. i'll know more tomorrow - but unlike this thread, this is not a joke.

He is not happy with the way some are reacting to his 'preferences'.

Green_Street

3 Oct 2006, 17:22

Simplified, it could be:

Everitt -> StKilda
Goddard -> Carlton
Thornton -> Hawthorn

Anyone??

There is no way we are going to give a a kid who we have put 3 years work into and is just starting to come good for that scum Everitt

Lukazzz777

3 Oct 2006, 17:23

Just in case everyone would believe it and then it would come true??

You're an idiot.

BTW - if you want some real news, I heard than Sammy mitchell wants out at Hawthorn. i'll know more tomorrow - but unlike this thread, this is not a joke.

He is not happy with the way some are reacting to his 'preferences'.

Didn't like my Kangaroos thread Zebra ???

You are the idiot dude ...

Go the Roos ... lol

ausfatcat

3 Oct 2006, 17:25

wow I surprised to see that a Hawthorn fan posted this. It is so unbiased and not lobsided at all a 32 year old with off field problems in the twilight of his career out the door for a 22yr old KPP backman with lots of potential to improve (already a good player). Such a even trade...

SMOO

3 Oct 2006, 17:27

YOur posts are full of more c rap than a gur with iriitable bowel syndomes toilet And they really stink. If you post bulltish rumours at least do some background checks re there resignings and contract status. Geeez

Ramma

3 Oct 2006, 17:29

There is no way we are going to give a a kid who we have put 3 years work into and is just starting to come good for that scum Everitt
Fair enough - I guess Thomas thought the same way.

Question is - would Spider get you over the line within the next 2 years (scum or not)?

(fwiw - I don't believe the original post either)

delirious1

3 Oct 2006, 17:29

3rd round pick for everitt

ausfatcat

3 Oct 2006, 17:32

spider may be a worth looking at from the saints point of view but not for silly trades like this, maybe and I say maybe for a second rnd or a 3rd and a fringe player. Or a GOP. This trade is just so ludicrous it's unbelieveable someone could post this thinking anyone would take it seriously.

The Punter

3 Oct 2006, 17:32

Don't you people know anything?

You cannot trade someone who is under contract before their next contract begins. Goddard just re-signed, so he cannot be traded until next year.

Gooka

3 Oct 2006, 17:33

haha I am quick :p

Johnson seems more realistic... to be honest losing cross wouldnt be too bad for the dogs. They seem to have all these guys who are roughly the same ie: gilbee hahn hardgraves cross ray griffen not sayin that is a bad thing!

Bzzz. Wrong.

Gilbee - Running/silky skilled Half Back Flanker
Hahn - Bulky Midfielder/half forward
Hargrave - 3rd tall who plays as a KPP due to our team set up.
Ray - Fast winger
Griffen - Set to be gun midfielder
Cross - In and under ball winner

People who say we have 'a lot of the same' mean we have a lot of runners like McMahon, Griffen, Cooney, Giansiracusa, Eagleton who can all play on ball. But as for 'roughly the same' Cross is only matched by Scott West in terms of what he does.

Cross is held in such high regard at the club and by the coaching staff, there's no way we'd give him up for Aker. No way.

chelsworthgale

3 Oct 2006, 17:38

Bzzz. Wrong.

Gilbee - Running/silky skilled Half Back Flanker
Hahn - Bulky Midfielder/half forward
Hargrave - 3rd tall who plays as a KPP due to our team set up.
Ray - Fast winger
Griffen - Set to be gun midfielder
Cross - In and under ball winner

People who say we have 'a lot of the same' mean we have a lot of runners like McMahon, Griffen, Cooney, Giansiracusa, Eagleton who can all play on ball. But as for 'roughly the same' Cross is only matched by Scott West in terms of what he does.

Cross is held in such high regard at the club and by the coaching staff, there's no way we'd give him up for Aker. No way.

They are still all midfielders who can play on a flank... maybe with the exception of hardgraves. IMO the dogs dont need someone like aker they could do with someone like Polak

Ramma

3 Oct 2006, 17:38

Don't you people know anything?

You cannot trade someone who is under contract before their next contract begins. Goddard just re-signed, so he cannot be traded until next year.
If both parties agree to break the contract they can.

ausfatcat

3 Oct 2006, 17:40

Don't you people know anything?

You cannot trade someone who is under contract before their next contract begins. Goddard just re-signed, so he cannot be traded until next year.

wrong, it was only talked about bringing in a rule to that effect (ie, the heffernan rule) but the AFLPA decided against it as it would restrict movement. eg. someone extends his contract in janurary and then has a falling out in july, can't go to anther club in october trade period ends up nowhere. In other words yes Goddard can be traded but because he is in contract he has to agree to it.

chelsworthgale

3 Oct 2006, 17:40

Don't you people know anything?

You cannot trade someone who is under contract before their next contract begins. Goddard just re-signed, so he cannot be traded until next year.

Is that the Heffernan rule? I never quite understood that!

ausfatcat

3 Oct 2006, 17:42

there is no heffernan rule see my post above, they didn't bring it in.

chelsworthgale

3 Oct 2006, 17:56

there is no heffernan rule see my post above, they didn't bring it in.

ease up fella check out the time we both posted... Yours wasnt on my radar...

Realistic Tiger

3 Oct 2006, 18:01

footy_paul

3 Oct 2006, 18:04

my source is red hot, but I still can't believe this:

Trade 1
everitt to saints, goddard to carlton, #1 pick to saints who trade pick to Brisbane for Bradshaw, Bradshaw to Hawthorn.
Trade 1
Hawks - in Bradshaw - out everett
Saints - in everitt - out goddard
Carlton - in Goddard - out top pick
Brisbane - in top pick - out bradshaw

Trade 2
Brisbane - aker to dogs
Dogs - cross to ess
Ess - Stanton to Bris

get ****ed you moron, stanton is staying with us, and carlton wont part with pick 1 :rolleyes: some ppl

ausfatcat

3 Oct 2006, 18:06

While we are telling fairytales and make believe:
Judd to Pies for Both Clokes
Cox to the Saints for Andrew Thompson
Hall to the Tigers for Rodan, Roach and Humm

Just because you write something does not mean it is true.

nice trade obviously a reliable souce but I think this trade would be more reliable.

Cox and Judd to saints for Thompson and schwarz

even thou schwarze is worth a lot more because he played eight games this year (improving).