View Full Version : Stuart Clark - going off!
beatnik
24 Nov 2006, 14:19
is Clark trying to grab Watson's all-rounder spot?
:D
PAFC2004
24 Nov 2006, 14:23
Who knows, but it's awesome!
RoosterLad
24 Nov 2006, 14:39
He is a bloody good batsman. Australia hardly have a tail, even Pidge can bat alright.
PAFC2004
24 Nov 2006, 14:42
He is a bloody good batsman. Australia hardly have a tail, even Pidge can bat alright.
At times... ;)
Oh When the Saints
24 Nov 2006, 16:13
Beautiful bowler too.
Stuart Clark: Career Prediction
150 wickets @ 22.34
Stock92
24 Nov 2006, 16:16
Stuart Clark - The All-Rounder
RoosterLad
24 Nov 2006, 16:20
He is bowling extremely well.
who wood_collingwood
24 Nov 2006, 16:45
How good is this bloke bowling?
Absolutely fantastic.
Does anyone think he looks like Gary Sinise off CSI NY?
Browney2006
24 Nov 2006, 16:52
Everyone is back on the bandwagon?
Smokey_22
24 Nov 2006, 17:11
Strange how so many people were on his back when selection time was near. The guy is all class, and a great bloke off the field.
raikkonen
24 Nov 2006, 17:13
Everyone is back on the bandwagon?
Not me. :thumbsd:
Everyone can arse something like that every so often.
davey_magik
24 Nov 2006, 17:16
Still don't rate him that highly.
And yeh I know you will all turn on me for saying that, but he's not that good.
treeman
24 Nov 2006, 17:28
Everyone is back on the bandwagon?
No ********! I was the only one he supported his inclusion in this match about a month ago and noone agreed with me. Look at him now. Awesome bowling and Excellent batting!
-Ben
who wood_collingwood
24 Nov 2006, 17:30
well seeing as I don't see much cricket other than in the aust matches, and I hadn't mentioned anything of him previously. I can comment I would think.
This is the first time I have seen him. I actually wanted Mitchell Johnson in, for eye candy.
All I was doing was commenting on his bowling today. Can't someone appreciate a good bowling spell???????
Weird place this!
i'd still prefer Tait.
Tait and Lee opening the bowling is a deadly combination.
This is the first time I have seen him. I actually wanted Mitchell Johnson in, for eye candy.
If you don't mind me asking, are you m or f?
who wood_collingwood
24 Nov 2006, 17:38
dunno too many guys who would say they wanted eye candy in the test team. hehe
Yea true, lol.
Would have preferred
Tait, Lee, Johnson
than
McGrath, Clark, Lee
personally.
King Elvis
24 Nov 2006, 18:15
dunno too many guys who would say they wanted eye candy in the test team. hehe
They asked whether you were male or female because you support Collingwood.
If you supported any other team, bar Port Adelaide, they would've assumed you're a heterosexual female.
Stock92
24 Nov 2006, 18:39
Yea true, lol.
Would have preferred
Tait, Lee, Johnson
than
McGrath, Clark, Lee
personally.
thats the stupidest thing ive heard in ages
Grimreepah
24 Nov 2006, 22:34
Wasn't happy about Clark getting the nod, but I'll have to admit he's been very good so far, and I don't think the others could have done any better so seems like the selectors may have got it right.
TheColeTrain
24 Nov 2006, 23:17
Still hold the opinion that he is a nothing selection
Underdog
25 Nov 2006, 00:28
Yea true, lol.
Would have preferred
Tait, Lee, Johnson
than
McGrath, Clark, Lee
personally.
you are a chump
i'd still prefer Tait.
Tait and Lee opening the bowling is a deadly combination.
Thank god you are not selecting the side then... Poms would be 0-100.
Clark's control and subtle movement was very impressive, but he's been doing this all summer so no real surprise.
Clark was the pick of the bowlers last night.
Squizza
25 Nov 2006, 07:16
His bowling was McGrath like. His grouping was superb, brilliant spell of bowling.
he can make 100 and take 20 wickets for the match, but he'd still be a dud
Tait was the standout quick last year statistically and otherwise, Clark is less entertaining also.
Poms get themselves out anyway.
Coin_Toss
25 Nov 2006, 07:35
Johnson's 54-run knock > Clark's 39-run knock ;)
Like I said; Clark will bowl McGrath like figures, which is commendable, but would like to see some much needed variety into our attack. He deserves all the credit he's getting though, because he continues to bowl a nice tight line and length and he's trained pretty hard to get out on the pitch and play Test cricket.
All the best to him - I hope he bowls well and gets a few wickets today.
rumblah
25 Nov 2006, 07:59
you are a chump
ahahahah starz, you got served.
Sanguinarius
25 Nov 2006, 07:59
Not me. :thumbsd:
Everyone can arse something like that every so often.
same. don't rate him at all. he's a bowler and an average one at that, who cares if he hit's a 30 occasionally.
GoSydneySwans
25 Nov 2006, 08:08
Strangely enough, that Tufnell bloke put it best - why would they fancy their chances against someone who bowls just like Glenn McGrath? They would've much rathered Tait or Johnson.
RoosterLad
25 Nov 2006, 12:46
Another wicket for Clark.
RoosterLad
25 Nov 2006, 12:47
Take two.
Squizza
25 Nov 2006, 12:50
Didn't really rate this bloke at all, but his bowling this innings has been awesome.
3-21 from 14 overs... not too shabby.
His control was fantastic, subtle movement and was nippy... proved why his spot should not have been in doubt.
MacGill will be the only bowler to dislodge him this summer on a turning track.