PDA

View Full Version : Rules of the Ashes


Cynic
20 Dec 2006, 10:33
Rules of the Ashes

Officially announced by the Australian Cricket Board.
Following the recent crushing defeat of England, the International Cricket Council has imposed a new set of rules for the up coming Ashes series to make the contest more even.

As a result, England (http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/England) has been granted an automatic wicket keeper, freeing up whichever poor sod, (it could be me my geography professor for all I ********ing care) to defend the boundary. Under the rule, Australian batsmen will be deemed out "caught behind" if the ball nicks their bat and lands in the immediate area behind the wicket. The rule is a compromise from the original English proposal which had pushed for automatic slips as well. The ICC refused that request on the rounds that "someone has to go and get the ball when an Australian misses it."
In addition, Australia is under strict "tip-and-run" restrictions which require they take a run off every ball they hit. Ricky Ponting was happy to accept this, as it meant no change to his current game plan. As a compromise, it was agreed that the Australians will also have to shout out the word "wickets" when completing a run to make run out decisions by umpires easier.
Following his outstanding performances, Australian wicketkeeper Adam Gilchrist (http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Adam_Gilchrist) has "six and out (http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Six)" restrictions imposed on him. As well, following complaints from English fielders, Gilchrist will have to get the ball if it goes across the road.
Instead of using a bat, Matt Hayden will now be obliged to use his arm with his jumper wrapped around it.
New rules for England include "one hand, one bounce" while they are fielding, and the provision of "last man's tucker" when they are batting.
The English tried to extend the "can't get out first ball" provision to "can't get out first ten overs", but the ICC proclaimed that the extra runs gained would hardly be worth the effort. Australian captain Ricky Ponting has vigorously opposed the "last man's tucker" rule and has launched an appeal. Ponting says Australia will only agree to the rule if there are electric wickets at the end, allowing Aussie fielders to throw to the stumps at either end.
A spokesperson for the ICC also announced that "from now on Ian Bell can't get out for a duck (http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Duck)".
Liam Plunkett will also be allowed to wrap the ball's seam with electrical tape when he's bowling in the second innings.
The spokesperson added there will be "no LBW" for English batsmen unless "it is really, really obvious."
Shane Warne has conceded that it's "fair enough" that he has to bowl underarm (but not molly grubbers) to the English tail end, and must inform the batsman what each delivery will do.
If England decides that Steve Harmison is to be given an over, the umpire will deem the Australian batsmen as dismissed if Harmison lands the ball anywhere on the pitch. Captain Ricky Ponting has no problems with this change, as the probability of such a dismissal occurring is infinitesimally small.
England will be given a bonus run every time a member of the crowd (or Australian team) tells Ashley Giles that he is crapper than Monty Panesar.
Brett Lee is not permitted a run up. He may however waddle up the crease in a Warnie-like fashion.Despite the changes, Australia remains firm favourites going into the Ashes Series, paying $0.22, while an English win is currently paying $1.3 trillion.

Source http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Ashes_%28Cricket%29

TheBushranger
20 Dec 2006, 10:47
It is sad that someone took the time to do that.

footy_rulz
20 Dec 2006, 10:50
It is sad that someone took the time to do that.

Its still pretty funny though. Have a sense of humour mate :thumbsu:

RoosterLad
20 Dec 2006, 11:04
That was pretty funny stuff!

Jeremias
20 Dec 2006, 11:06
Quite a humorous read :thumbsu:

Jeremias
20 Dec 2006, 11:07
It is sad that someone took the time to do that.

Pommie sympathiser?

janiek
20 Dec 2006, 11:08
i wanted england to win in perth & even i found it funny in a sad sort of way

TheBushranger
20 Dec 2006, 11:13
Pommie sympathiser?
Couldn't be further from the truth. Have a look at some of my recent posts where I bag the crap out of them.

roostersgal4eva
20 Dec 2006, 11:31
It is sad that someone took the time to do that.
I LOL'd

:D

Cynic
20 Dec 2006, 11:36
Can anyone tell me what the 'last mans tucker' rule means?

PrideOf
20 Dec 2006, 12:01
Can anyone tell me what the 'last mans tucker' rule means?

It's rhyming slang.

Sidey_87
20 Dec 2006, 13:02
Can anyone tell me what the 'last mans tucker' rule means?

Where last man standing gets to bat on his own until he goes out aswell because he has run out of partners.

scooter600x
20 Dec 2006, 13:07
Where last man standing gets to bat on his own until he goes out aswell because he has run out of partners.

If they had that rule in our first innings in Perth, Mike Hussey might still be batting.

hawkaz1
20 Dec 2006, 13:32
If they had that rule in our first innings in Perth, Mike Hussey might still be batting.

I think you mean would. Hussey would bat forever if given the chance, he only goes out so that the other teams think they have a chance of winning.

Renegade
20 Dec 2006, 16:08
Have to admit a had a chuckle.

TheBushranger
20 Dec 2006, 17:20
Have to admit a had a chuckle.
Yeah, like I did when watching England play.

legitimatic
20 Dec 2006, 17:29
Gotta love uncyclopedia :thumbsu:

ViperV10
20 Dec 2006, 19:18
Who is the Australian Cricket Board? How old is this thing, they have been called Cricket Australia for years.

eddiesmith
20 Dec 2006, 21:21
Exactly, probably something recycled from years ago with a couple of names changed, boring

RoosterLad
20 Dec 2006, 21:57
Exactly, probably something recycled from years ago with a couple of names changed, boring

At least Renegade is an English with a sense of humour. Hang on, you aren't English at all are ya?

eddiesmith
20 Dec 2006, 21:58
At least Renegade is an English with a sense of humour. Hang on, you aren't English at all are ya?
It was boring, predictable and old, dont see whats funny about it, you make it sound like you are all seeing it for the first time, there have been many different versions with the same theme for years

RoosterLad
20 Dec 2006, 21:59
What was funnier eddie?

The new rules in this thread or your effort in the prediction threads stating the aussies might as well not show up to the Ashes?

belfast_bomber
20 Dec 2006, 22:00
It was boring, predictable and old, dont see whats funny about it, you make it sound like you are all seeing it for the first time, there have been many different versions with the same theme for years
you'll forgive us if england being rubbish never ceases to be funny

Antonius
20 Dec 2006, 22:01
Gotta love uncyclopedia :thumbsu:
Read the Chad Fletcher article :D

eddiesmith
20 Dec 2006, 22:03
you'll forgive us if england being rubbish never ceases to be funny
My favourites are the jokes which appeared after the 1st test in 2005 yet were not seen again untill the end of the 1st test this year :D

But I guess Aussies laugh at the same jokes over and over again and yet anything anti Australia gets old real quick

belfast_bomber
20 Dec 2006, 22:18
My favourites are the jokes which appeared after the 1st test in 2005 yet were not seen again untill the end of the 1st test this year :D

But I guess Aussies laugh at the same jokes over and over again and yet anything anti Australia gets old real quick
well, yeah. anti-australia jokes look pretty old right now don't they?

rdhopkins2
20 Dec 2006, 22:43
new rule just in: No one with the surname of McGrath or Warne may play in 2007 for Australia, however they can be traded to English county cricket in return for Giles and Harmison