View Full Version : Should Hilf be at WC for Pidge
I cant help but think that Hilf would have made our attack much stronger. Its more hard to score runs of Hilf than it is pigeon now days. Hilf oviously swings the ball aswell & that is so valuable when the pitch is a road. Mcgrath has been going for a few when its a road.
In my opinion the selectors went with pigeon because of loyalty, i just hope it doesnt cost us the cup.
I cant help but think that Hilf would have made our attack much stronger. Its more hard to score runs of Hilf than it is pigeon now days. Hilf oviously swings the ball aswell & that is so valuable when the pitch is a road. Mcgrath has been going for a few when its a road.
In my opinion the selectors went with pigeon because of loyalty, i just hope it doesnt cost us the cup.
Agree Ross, selectors were hamstrung when McGrath opted for his swansong at the WC. Hilfenhaus while lacking experience looks ready to go and impressed in his brief international exposure.
Pigeon has quite a few wickets this WC but his stats are misleading IMO with many soft dismissals, especially against some weaker teams. But the poms put him to the sword, as did muppet and AB in the Saffas game.
In contrast Tait has been outstanding, particularly with the older ball, Bracken's been very reliable (brief lapses against SA) while Hogg can't be faulted and adds another dimension to the attack. McGrath's fielding remains problematic. With him in the team if Watson's unavailable it makes the decision to play only four frontline bowlers a risky proposition against a potentially powerful batting lineup.
i think australian cricket owe it to him to be there, hes taken 500 test wickets and 300 odd ODI wickets, he is a champion.
Ted Ed Fred
12 Apr 2007, 21:00
What nonsense. Pidge have been excellent this world cup. Seems he can't win, he was the best bowler in the CWB series yet even then people were saying he should be dropped :rolleyes:
Does tend to get hit around by top orders now, but in the middle overs and at the death he is one of the best going around.
davey_magik
12 Apr 2007, 21:14
He has retired at the right time.
He is still our best death bowler along with Tait.
crudbucket
12 Apr 2007, 21:21
At the time of writing, he is joint leading wicket taker along with Malinga.
Pigeon has quite a few wickets this WC but his stats are misleading IMO with many soft dismissals, especially against some weaker teams. But the poms put him to the sword, as did muppet and AB in the Saffas game.
Agreed. When you watch him against the better teams he just doesnt look like getting a wicket.
Bracken's been very reliable (brief lapses against SA)
It is worrying with Bracks & Pidge 2 of our 3 pace bowlers. I only see Tait as a genuine wicket taking threat when the batsmen are not trying to slog. This Watto injury really hurts, Watto is a gun with the ball averaging 19 with it in 2006, thats better than most strike bowlers around the world.
Corrosion
12 Apr 2007, 21:49
Have you even watched the World Cup you muppet?
Have you even watched the World Cup you muppet?
I don't know which muppet you're referring to but I think it's dangerous to go on stats alone. AB and the real muppet smashed McGrath. Bell and KP looked like destroying him so Punter had to remove him as things were getting out of hand. Yet in the 20/20 against the Bangers 3 of their ambitious youngsters handed him fairly soft wickets, as did a couple of the Windians unnecessarily so at the time. Also picked up a few bonus wickets in the last over of the poms innings against **** batsmen desperate to get some quick runs as they had slowed up dramatically. I wouldn't back him against good batsmen who were attacking him with very little assistance in the pitch. I think he's lucky he has the support of Bracken and Tait aided by the variety of Hogg. If he was in a mediocre team he'd be hit around more IMO.
Incidentally Langeveldt is well up in the wickets too but has leaked runs as well.
Always remember to read beyond the stats.
Have you even watched the World Cup you muppet?
Dont give yourself a heart attack.
DeadlyAkkuret
12 Apr 2007, 22:01
McGrath has been fine through this WC, Hilfy is still a newbie. If Pigeon was going to be replaced, it would be by Clark.
Corrosion
12 Apr 2007, 22:02
A wicket is a wicket no matter how soft the dismissal is. If McGrath continues to get hs 3-50/60 then I'm happy. Least he is getting wickets. That is the most important stat.
Corrosion
12 Apr 2007, 22:02
Dont give yourself a heart attack.
:confused: :confused: :confused:
Grimreepah
12 Apr 2007, 22:57
No, Pidge is the man. People keep writing him off, and he keeps proving them wrong.
Ted Ed Fred
12 Apr 2007, 23:00
He never gets the new ball, and he doesn't get reverse swing, so he basically never gets to get any sideways movement. First change is possibly the worst time to bowl in these conditions, because what little sideways there is has always dissapeared but the field is still up and the ball coming on perfectly. Tait hasn't got any swing with the new ball so far, so I'd give the new nut to McGrath and bring Tait on after a couple of overs.
I love Hilfy but could have seen him copping a lot of stick at this WC. He relies a lot on conventional swing which you don't get in the Carribean
RooBuoy
12 Apr 2007, 23:05
Can I just ask what has McGrath done wrong?
He's the second leading wicket taker at the World Cup, what does he have to do!
I love Hilfy but could have seen him copping a lot of stick at this WC. He relies a lot on conventional swing which you don't get in the Carribean
You oviously havent seen Hilf bowl very much. He usually starts bowling wicket off cutters if he isnt getting swing.
GoSydneySwans
12 Apr 2007, 23:12
The Hilf should be in for Johnson, McGrath's doing pretty well, whether you're 'looking past the stats' or not.
Can I just ask what has McGrath done wrong?
He's the second leading wicket taker at the World Cup, what does he have to do!
3 wickets against Scottland. 2 against Netherlands. 3 against Windies. 3 against Bangladesh in a 20/20 game. So he has done good against the minnow teams.
BUT.....Got hammerd againt Saffers & got hammerd againt Poms but picked up 2 final over wickets cos they had to slog. He has been less than impressive against these 2 more classy teams.
& rememeber he copped some fearfull hammerings in NZ recently, i know most of our bowlers did but Pidge allso copped some massive poundings in the CB series. I recall him going for 80+ a few times. He should stand down & tell the selectors Hilf should replace him.
Grimreepah
12 Apr 2007, 23:35
I recall him going for 80+ a few times.
Your memory is faulty.
King Elvis
13 Apr 2007, 00:28
At the time of writing, he is joint leading wicket taker along with Malinga.
Damn right.
I came into this thread expecting it to have been started months ago, and revived for a laugh.
McGrath is one of the leading wicket takers in the world cup - this thread is ****ing stupid.
all of you who are doubting what i am saying dont much about cricket.
Russian
13 Apr 2007, 02:07
all of you who are doubting what i am saying dont much about cricket.Says he who just saidI recall him going for 80+ a few times. He's gone for more than 60 just nine times in 245 games, and never gone for 80. :rolleyes: Possibly a more stupid thread than some (only some and only possibly) of bushranger's
He's gone for more than 60 just nine times in 245 games, and never gone for 80
Did go for 72 in Perth recently.
bombersno1
13 Apr 2007, 12:19
Another Bushranger alias?
Smokey_22
13 Apr 2007, 15:03
This thread is absolutely ludacris.
We havent even lost a game.
Pathetic call. :thumbsd:
pidge took 1 for 60+ v Saffers & 3 for 60+ against Poms when he got 2 cheap wkts in the final over because Poms had to go. it flatterd him.
so against any decent teams he has been hammerd......i know you guys are just lookin at his form against minnows to destort ya views & thats up to you if ya wanna live in a dream world.
King Elvis
13 Apr 2007, 15:43
pidge took 1 for 60+ v Saffers & 3 for 60+ against Poms when he got 2 cheap wkts in the final over because Poms had to go. it flatterd him.
so against any decent teams he has been hammerd......i know you guys are just lookin at his form against minnows to destort ya views & thats up to you if ya wanna live in a dream world.
Ignoring the fact that he was targetted by both of those teams, and still managed to return quite reasonable figures?
Do we discount Hayden's awesome forum because it hasn't been against all gun sides?
Cooldude
13 Apr 2007, 15:44
Mitch Johnson should've been out and Hilfenhouse in
Ignoring the fact that he was targetted by both of those teams
can you think of any reason why they may have targeted him ?????????
Grimreepah
13 Apr 2007, 15:52
pidge took 1 for 60+ v Saffers & 3 for 60+ against Poms when he got 2 cheap wkts in the final over because Poms had to go. it flatterd him.
so against any decent teams he has been hammerd......i know you guys are just lookin at his form against minnows to destort ya views & thats up to you if ya wanna live in a dream world.
If you had been following the World Cup you would have noticed that there have been a lot of high scoring matches, and that all bowlers have gone for runs at times. For example, in the game against SA 8 bowlers went for more than 60 runs.
The fact that McGrath has better figures against minnows than good teams is hardly a revelation.
Teams have targeted pidge because he is the weak link!
No, but Hilfenhaus should be there ahead of Clark or Johnson.
King Elvis
14 Apr 2007, 00:19
Teams have targeted pidge because he is the weak link!
If they target him and he gets 3/60, I hope they target him every game.