View Full Version : Selwood v Headland, religious or atheist?
bzparkes
17 Apr 2007, 15:12
I'm just curious as to who, as a social demographic, sides with Headland or Selwood. It'll be an anonymous poll so Freo and WCE supporters can vote truly, not based on their club.
ps, sorry about the double post, forgot to add a poll :rolleyes:
EDIT - those who consider yourselves as Gnostic/Agnostic or don't conform to organised religion, list yourself as atheist for the purposes of this poll.
Waverley73
17 Apr 2007, 15:16
Dang, your double post/thread has made me say this twice. So you're assuming people have to be either religious or athiest then?
So you're assuming people have to be either religious or athiest then?
What else is there?
Waverley73
17 Apr 2007, 15:18
What else is there?
Agnostic for starters (not religious but also don't have the strong 'anti-religious' views that athiests have).
Lynch takes a mark
17 Apr 2007, 15:20
Agnostic for starters (not religious but also don't have the strong 'anti-religious' views that athiests have).lol
anti religious?
Waverley73
17 Apr 2007, 15:21
lol
anti religious?
haha - I wasn't sure how else to put it... More sceptical really. Here's a link showing I didn't just make it up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic
bzparkes
17 Apr 2007, 15:26
Agnostic for starters (not religious but also don't have the strong 'anti-religious' views that athiests have).
Haha, should've though of that as I'm agnostic myself. For the sake of it, put yourself down as atheist as you're not categorised in the morals/values of mainstream religion.
Waverley73
17 Apr 2007, 15:33
Haha, should've though of that as I'm agnostic myself. For the sake of it, put yourself down as atheist as you're not categorised in the morals/values of mainstream religion.
For the record I wasn't talking about myself - just noticed that there was the two extremes and that everyone wouldn't fit into them.
Cheers.
Fledgling
17 Apr 2007, 17:06
I think they were both in the wrong. Sledging lacks common decency and for Headland to respond to something as stupid, improbable and disgusting as Selwood's alleged comments in the way that he did, should've been beneath him. But if you're asking who took the lower moral ground, I think it was Selwood.
wce4premiership
17 Apr 2007, 23:10
very interesting atm, quite even