View Full Version : kingsley kickd 8 at coburg
Richo=Champion
10 May 2007, 21:34
Kent kicked 8 at coburg why wouldnt u put him in the seniors gRrRrR:mad: i am looking forward to seeing how he goes in seniors anyone agree:thumbsu:
Kent kicked 8 at coburg why wouldnt u put him in the seniors gRrRrR:mad: i am looking forward to seeing how he goes in seniors anyone agree:thumbsu:
kicked 8 for coburg reserves thats why
benny_furs
10 May 2007, 21:50
8 goals straight, 3 assists.... and he sat out the whole last quarter.
But he's still underdone.
Wally Matera
10 May 2007, 21:52
anyone agree
nope... come again. :rolleyes:
Tonycam*
10 May 2007, 22:07
They dont want to take any risks , want to make sure he is got enough match time before getting into seniors
Gavin Excell
10 May 2007, 22:23
after kicking 8 in the coburg reserves he may get the promotion to the coburg seniors. Good get there tiges.
Billy Bob65
10 May 2007, 22:49
kicked 8 for coburg reserves thats why
Yeah but all bar Howat of the ins also played for Coburg Reserves last week. Surely if Richo is expected to ruck they need an extra option up there other than Hughes and especially with Schulz in doubt.
Richo for PM
10 May 2007, 23:04
schultz will play and i watched the game and he still looks rusty - definatly not ready for afl yet
after kicking 8 in the coburg reserves he may get the promotion to the coburg seniors. Good get there tiges.
Coburg had the bye you filth. Get a brain or do some research or just go **** ottens up the batty because thats all you'll get out of him this weekend. ;)
Rockford
11 May 2007, 03:41
Where does Kent fit in now with the youth policy? I'd like to see him getting picked if he's in the best 22, I don't see how it helps the club or the younger players to walk straight into a playing position regardless of whether or not they're the best player for that position on the day.
Al Foil
11 May 2007, 12:58
Why the hell aren't they playing Riewoldt? Surely if you're going with youth, and knowing that we're nowhere near finals this year, why wouldn't they give him games under his belt this year?
He'd have to be a better inclusion than Krakouer, surely? It's the same as dropping Jackson, Meyer and Moore - why not give these kids game time rather than playing them like tampons. One week in and three weeks out. It seems to be a recurring policy at Richmond for the past 8-10 years of playing guys for a week and then banish them.
Also agree that Kingsley should have at least been named on an extended bench.
LarryLong
11 May 2007, 16:31
after kicking 8 in the coburg reserves he may get the promotion to the coburg seniors. Good get there tiges.
Probably would have kicked 8 if he was playing for the Geelong seniors last week too. :)
Anyway, give the guy a break. It's not his fault idiots like you tried to bill him as the second coming and then turned on him because he just turned out to be a decent player on his day. ;)
Why the hell aren't they playing Riewoldt? Surely if you're going with youth, and knowing that we're nowhere near finals this year, why wouldn't they give him games under his belt this year?
He'd have to be a better inclusion than Krakouer, surely? It's the same as dropping Jackson, Meyer and Moore - why not give these kids game time rather than playing them like tampons. One week in and three weeks out. It seems to be a recurring policy at Richmond for the past 8-10 years of playing guys for a week and then banish them.
Also agree that Kingsley should have at least been named on an extended bench.
There is more to teach the kids than putting them in a game.
They have to perform, consistantly, to get promoted, and if they don't
keep it up they get dropped.