View Full Version : Should Chris Judd have been suspended for his eye gouge?
james Dean
30 May 2007, 01:59
Yes/No?
jbomb3000
30 May 2007, 13:02
Don't think there was much in it really but i would have like to have seen how it went down if it was a Brown eye gouge on Judd?
Alphanumeric
30 May 2007, 15:19
No. If people are going to get weeks for stuff like that, then I'll give watching footy away.
Gunnar Longshanks
30 May 2007, 21:36
We don't want players getting suspended more often than absolutely necessary.
I reckon that's a fundamental truth that gets lost in the week-to-week cycle.
SWANNIES RULE
30 May 2007, 21:41
He should of been suspended.
Cassius_Clay
30 May 2007, 21:42
Ben Holland drew blood and got 0 weeks, so no.
Sorry freo fans :)
A Living God
30 May 2007, 21:44
The poll is biased by the wording of the question, the question is worded in way as there is no doubt that Judd actions was an Eye gouge.
Fledgling
1 Jun 2007, 09:39
I would've kinda liked to have seen him suspended - and then have Cousins fill the spot :D
...I can dream can't I? :o