View Full Version : Best Under 23 State Team
EagleMan87
31 May 2007, 16:44
Which state side is the best?
WESTERN AUSTRALIA:
B: Pettigrew Polak O'Brien
HB: Duffield Johnson Toovey
C: Swallow Priddis Wells
HF: Morton Kennedy LeCras
F: M Clark Franklin N Krakouer
R: Ryder Van Berlo Moody
Int: Johns J Griffin Ray Bradley
VICTORIA:
B: Walker, Gilham, Goddard
HB: H. Shaw, Mundy, Deledio
C: M. Murphy, McLean, Pendlebury
HF: Thomas, T.Cloke, McGlynn
F: Higgins, N.Ablett, Hawkins
R: McIntosh, Hodge, J.Lewis
Int: Stanton, M. Blake, Salopek, Adcock
SOUTH AUSTRALIA:
B: Patfull Rivers Slattery
HB: Russell Bell Hurn
C: Butler Schammer Griffen
HF: Porplyzia Schultz L Thomas
F: Monfries Hughes Rusling
R: Wood Mackie Pearce
Int: Gibbs Symes Minson Stokes
The Zebra
31 May 2007, 16:55
Based on this year, Victoria has a top 3 ruckman (McIntosh), possibly the best HBF (Shaw) a killer midfield brigade with Lewis, Mclean, Murphy, Stanton and Salopek and two of the three that will fight out the rising star in Pendlebury and Higgins.
Victoria easily.
EagleMan87
31 May 2007, 17:00
Based on this year, Victoria has a top 3 ruckman (McIntosh), possibly the best HBF (Shaw) a killer midfield brigade with Lewis, Mclean, Murphy, Stanton and Salopek and two of the three that will fight out the rising star in Pendlebury and Higgins.
Victoria easily.
WA has a better forwardline and backline, a good midfield and servicable ruckmen.
WA would flogs the Vics IMO.
crosby123
31 May 2007, 17:05
Vics would flog WA. Far stronger midfield, better rucks, better forwards. Weak defence, though.
EagleMan87
31 May 2007, 17:09
Vics would flog WA. Far stronger midfield, better rucks, better forwards. Weak defence, though.
How is your forwardline better?
We have Franklin, Clark, Krakouer. You have Nablett, Hawkins, Cloke.
The Zebra
31 May 2007, 17:10
WA has a better forwardline and backline, a good midfield and servicable ruckmen.
WA would flogs the Vics IMO.
Not a clear cut win in either that back or forward lines. I would say the WA backline is marginally better because of Johnson, but the Vic forward line gets the points on performance so far.
Franklin is good for WA, but Kennedy has done nothing and Clark has had one good game as the second forward to a very imposing J brown.
Ablett has been far better than Clark, Cloke has become a good CHF and Higgins and hawkins look great.
The midfield class gap is massive. Vics destroy them
crosby123
31 May 2007, 18:04
How is your forwardline better?
We have Franklin, Clark, Krakouer. You have Nablett, Hawkins, Cloke.
Krakouer hardly a tall.
Franklin > Cloke
Nablett > Clark
Hawkins > Kennedy
Vics have 2/3 better talls (when comparing best v. best, 2nd best v. 2nd best and so on).
MarkJohnson#1
31 May 2007, 18:27
Victoria EASILY.
Big Nasty
31 May 2007, 19:39
Hawkins is from NSW
McIntosh is from NSW, but we'd be happy to have him in the Vic's team.
melbournemartin
31 May 2007, 19:58
The other teams look quite weak.
Cassius_Clay
31 May 2007, 19:59
SA easily. Only cos of Schammer
Both Hawkins and McIntosh played most of their Junior football in Victoria though (MGS and MB/VC)
donsman4eva
1 Jun 2007, 23:02
WA has a better forwardline and backline, a good midfield and servicable ruckmen.
WA would flogs the Vics IMO.
If Toovey is in the starting lineup, it is not a good lineup.
lookkg386
2 Jun 2007, 07:28
Victoria better all over the field.
matty lloyd the champ
3 Jun 2007, 12:33
where is ryder
take out mundy
and put Stanton on the field instead of Pendlebury at the moment