View Full Version : Kevin Bartlett Vs Ivan Milat
randy_stote
31 May 2007, 21:39
Who is has done more damage?
Kevin Barlett and his merry gang of gaylords on the rules committee to the AFL?
OR
Ivan Milat to backpacking?
DapperDon
31 May 2007, 23:21
lmfao :D :D
Voting this for the best thread of the year :thumbsu: Bartlett far far worse. No more person in the world i hate more than KB, purely because of his involvment in the rules commitee.
motorvinnie
1 Jun 2007, 09:04
stupid thread... ivan milat was one of the worst serial killers in Australia why would you use him as an example? stupid mate:thumbsd:
DapperDon
1 Jun 2007, 10:01
stupid thread... ivan milat was one of the worst serial killers in Australia why would you use him as an example? stupid mate:thumbsd:
take off your politically correct glasses and sell them for a sense of humour, you'll enjoy life more:thumbsu:
A Living God
1 Jun 2007, 19:20
stupid thread... ivan milat was one of the worst serial killers in Australia why would you use him as an example? stupid mate:thumbsd:
But he killed british backpackers, that has to make him one of the best serial killers we ever had.
DapperDon
1 Jun 2007, 20:20
But he killed british backpackers, that has to make him one of the best serial killers we ever had.
hasn't seemed to stop the pricks from coming over here;)
Milat would definately have a different interpretation of the "In the Back" rule..
Skeppersap
14 Jun 2007, 22:33
Who is has done more damage?
Kevin Barlett and his merry gang of gaylords on the rules committee to the AFL?
OR
Ivan Milat to backpacking?
Kevin Bartlett's inability to admit that the hands in the back rule is wrong just shows who he is and what he is made of. It takes a big man to admit they have made a mistake and Kevin is a little man with no penis. The bloke just sticks his head in the sand and refuses to admit the mistake. You'd think with Nathan Buckley (surely one of the most repected players in the AFL) quiting the rules committee, as well as the continuing angst from the players, coaches and public that they would change the rule. Similiar to the NRL's changing of the obstruction rule that wasn't working, Kevin has to remove his head from his arse and listen to the millions of people who love this game before its too late.
Hodge2Franklin
14 Jun 2007, 23:03
Kevin Bartlett's inability to admit that the hands in the back rule is wrong just shows who he is and what he is made of. It takes a big man to admit they have made a mistake and Kevin is a little man with no penis. The bloke just sticks his head in the sand and refuses to admit the mistake. You'd think with Nathan Buckley (surely one of the most repected players in the AFL) quiting the rules committee, as well as the continuing angst from the players, coaches and public that they would change the rule. Similiar to the NRL's changing of the obstruction rule that wasn't working, Kevin has to remove his head from his arse and listen to the millions of people who love this game before its too late.
:D:D:D pisser
lifelike_
17 Jun 2007, 02:31
Top thread.
Deserves a bump.
lookkg386
17 Jun 2007, 07:02
Milat would definately have a different interpretation of the "In the Back" rule..
NOW THAT'S FUNNY:D
melbournemartin
17 Jun 2007, 11:05
Great thread!