View Full Version : poor old rucci
A relative of mine is in the media industry and the topic of rucci came up unexpectedly out at dinner the other night.. it sort of made me feel a bit sorry for the man, apparantly its well known that he doesnt really have much of a life outside the media so no wonder hes trying to make a name for himself. It also bought a smile to my face that when neil craig does his press conferences, he gives one or two word answers to ruccis questions.. good one craigy :D:thumbsu:
http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g233/SexShoota/rucci.jpg
chopper55555
7 Jun 2007, 22:59
Go Rooch Go ... a long way away.
ThePeckers
7 Jun 2007, 23:10
haha classic. Rucci really does struggle
I wonder if Rucci wears that chef hat at home whilst he is preparing a dinner for one:D
Rucci is not poor and he's not old.
And he has a social network that's broader than this chatroom.
Rucci is not poor and he's not old.
And he has a social network that's broader than this chatroom.
good to see you're back John.
thought we'd lost you to the rights for gay whales campaign and other critical save the planet causes ;)
kimirocks
8 Jun 2007, 03:06
thought we'd lost you to the rights for gay whales campaign and other critical save the planet causes ;)
That made me chuckle. :)
I think we all feel sorry for Rooch, in the of mentally ill poor cousin kind of way.
Rucci is not poor and he's not old.
And he has a social network that's broader than this chatroom.
I don't consider having just one friend called JohnK a 'broad social network'.
crowman_23
8 Jun 2007, 10:15
I don't feel sorry for the Rooch at all. He has dug himself a hole. Just waiting for him to come on this thread now as the "Hawthorn" Supporter and start defending himself. Come on Rooch you know you want to.
http://www.fotosearch.com/thumb/csk/CSK120/KS2798.jpg
Here bighawk, come here boy ...
For goodness sake, people.
Attack the opinions of the man all you want. They are in the public domain. They are fair game, open for criticism or agreement.
Just like my opinions, just like anyone else on here.
Don't attack the man. It's lower than low. It's pathetic.
Redlegs14
8 Jun 2007, 15:30
For goodness sake, people.
Attack the opinions of the man all you want. They are in the public domain. They are fair game, open for criticism or agreement.
Just like my opinions, just like anyone else on here.
Don't attack the man. It's lower than low. It's pathetic.Before casting aspersions on those who attack Rucci, why don't you ask Rucci to stop attacking Scott Thompson.
And then ask him why he felt the need to attack Brent Reilly last year.
And finally, ask him why he feels the need to attack Crows supporters in general for bagging Perrie when he refuses to attack Port supporters for bagging Tredrea and Lonie. I mean what's the ****ing difference.
We will stop attacking Rucci when he admits he is a hypocrite and a gutter journalist.
He made his bed, now he has to sleep in it.
Thankyou for your time.
Crow Envy
8 Jun 2007, 15:35
Before casting aspersions on those who attack Rucci, why don't you ask Rucci to stop attacking Scott Thompson.
And then ask him why he felt the need to attack Brent Reilly last year.
And finally, ask him why he feels the need to attack Crows supporters in general for bagging Perrie when he doesn't attack Port supporters at all for bagging Tredrea and Lonie. I mean what's the ****ing difference.
We will stop attacking Rucci when he admits he is a hypocrite and a gutter journalist.
Thankyou for your time.
Well said Redlegs, we wont even make him admit he is a ****er, thats how generous we are!
Redlegs14
8 Jun 2007, 15:40
Well said Redlegs, we wont even make him admit he is a ****er, thats how generous we are!Small mercies CE.:thumbsu:
Before casting aspersions on those who attack Rucci, why don't you ask Rucci to stop attacking Scott Thompson.
And then ask him why he felt the need to attack Brent Reilly last year.
And finally, ask him why he feels the need to attack Crows supporters in general for bagging Perrie when he doesn't attack Port supporters at all for bagging Tredrea and Lonie. I mean what's the f***ing difference.
We will stop attacking Rucci when he admits he is a hypocrite and a gutter journalist.
Thankyou for your time.
Dont forget writing articles about Adelaide supporters not turning up even though Port have a bigger percentage of no shows than what Adelaide do.
Also bringing up the fact that Adelaide picked Ken McGregor when it could had Pavlich and ignoring the fact that Port chose Adam Morgan as their 17 year old player before Adelaide's pick meaning therefore chose him instead of Pavlich and he isnt even on their list anymore. At least McGregor has actually contributed something for our club, what did Morgan ever do at Port before he was traded to the bulldogs ??
Before casting aspersions on those who attack Rucci, why don't you ask Rucci to stop attacking Scott Thompson.
And then ask him why he felt the need to attack Brent Reilly last year.
And finally, ask him why he feels the need to attack Crows supporters in general for bagging Perrie when he refuses to attack Port supporters for bagging Tredrea and Lonie. I mean what's the ****ing difference.
We will stop attacking Rucci when he admits he is a hypocrite and a gutter journalist.
He made his bed, now he has to sleep in it.
Thankyou for your time.
Attack all those opinions you've just mentioned. Attack anything he says. Attack any hypocrisy you see. That's all fine.
I'm just asking people to address the issues, not the man.
Have a look at what I posted. I didn't attack the people, I attacked what they said. There's a fundamental difference. I'm not casting aspersions, I'm criticising what they said, just like you criticise what I said, which is your right.
To cast the sort aspersions that I've seen in this thread, or the other aspersions I've seen in the past month on this board about more than one media personality, is just unnecessary.
I'm just asking that everyone respect the difference between attacking what somebody says and attacking them personally - whether it's a public figure or a Bigfooty poster.
crows4always
8 Jun 2007, 16:23
http://www.fotosearch.com/thumb/csk/CSK120/KS2798.jpg
Here bighawk, come here boy ...:thumbsu:
Hope he puts his head in the trap, because he is only a feral feret headed sly mouse.
crows4always
8 Jun 2007, 16:26
Before casting aspersions on those who attack Rucci, why don't you ask Rucci to stop attacking Scott Thompson.
And then ask him why he felt the need to attack Brent Reilly last year.
And finally, ask him why he feels the need to attack Crows supporters in general for bagging Perrie when he refuses to attack Port supporters for bagging Tredrea and Lonie. I mean what's the ****ing difference.
We will stop attacking Rucci when he admits he is a hypocrite and a gutter journalist.
He made his bed, now he has to sleep in it.:thumbsu:
Thankyou for your time.
Exactly!
Redlegs14
8 Jun 2007, 16:31
Attack all those opinions you've just mentioned. Attack anything he says. Attack any hypocrisy you see. That's all fine.
I'm just asking people to address the issues, not the man.
Have a look at what I posted. I didn't attack the people, I attacked what they said. There's a fundamental difference. I'm not casting aspersions, I'm criticising what they said, just like you criticise what I said, which is your right.
To cast the sort aspersions that I've seen in this thread, or the other aspersions I've seen in the past month on this board about more than one media personality, is just unnecessary.
I'm just asking that everyone respect the difference between attacking what somebody says and attacking them personally - whether it's a public figure or a Bigfooty poster.So what you're effectively saying is, Rucci is allowed to personally attack people, but us peasants should only attack his opinions.:confused:
Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.
I wonder if Rucci wears that chef hat at home whilst he is preparing a dinner for one:D
hahahahh...I'll pay that one!
Truck Rutten
8 Jun 2007, 17:10
Rucci is not poor and he's not old.
And he has a social network that's broader than this chatroom.
I don't know that the Adelaide Dungeons & Dragons Society really constitutes a "social network" John ;)
brucetiki
8 Jun 2007, 17:10
Maybe we should start calling him Vinegar Tits - she had little/no life outside Wentworth (for those that are either old enough to remember her or collect the Prisoner DVD's).
Truck Rutten
8 Jun 2007, 17:15
Maybe we should start calling him Vinegar Tits - she had little/no life outside Wentworth (for those that are either old enough to remember her or collect the Prisoner DVD's).
Classic :D I remember the name but can't recall much about the character other than she was a fairly objectionable individual.
Classic :D I remember the name but can't recall much about the character other than she was a fairly objectionable individual.
Vera Bennett played by Fiona Spence
http://img.search.com/thumb/2/2a/PCBHVera.jpg/180px-PCBHVera.jpg
http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/3/30/180px-FionaSpence.jpg
dyertribe
8 Jun 2007, 18:03
Rucci is not poor and he's not old.
And he has a social network that's broader than this chatroom.
http://image09.webshots.com/9/2/82/35/123528235lmYVlh_ph.jpg
John Kingsmill and Michelangelo Rucci in protective caress.
chopper55555
8 Jun 2007, 20:54
Don't attack the man. It's lower than low. It's pathetic.
So's he. That's what he does. Stick up for you coach and club. :thumbsu:
Rucci is not poor and he's not old.
And he has a social network that's broader than this chatroom.
Welcome back to the boards John. A friend and I were discussing your long absence form this board last night. I hope the continued atacks by the mature people :rolleyes: dont dissuade you from continuing to provide an alternate voice
birdmanptr
8 Jun 2007, 21:06
For goodness sake, people.
Attack the opinions of the man all you want. They are in the public domain. They are fair game, open for criticism or agreement.
Just like my opinions, just like anyone else on here.
Don't attack the man. It's lower than low. It's pathetic.
Replace its with hes and its spot on
King Elvis
8 Jun 2007, 21:36
I do feel a little sorry for him.
I think he wrote that many negative articles about the Crows that weren't completely deliberate, more just skewed to show his bias, then one day realised that he was in a massive hole with not really anywhere to back up to.
Read his article today on the SOO dilemma to see a good reporter. Was both informative and balanced
Read his article today on the SOO dilemma to see a good reporter. Was both informative and balanced
There's no questioning his journalistic ability when he plays it straight.
I don't have any problem with appropriate criticism of Adelaide players, coaches or administration if that's his standard for ALL teams.
It's when he gets carried away with the Adelaide bashing to the exclusion of all others - which is almost certainly a directive from the Advertiser itself - that he completely loses me. :thumbsd:
chopper55555
9 Jun 2007, 17:20
Read his article today ...
No I swore off paying the paper to keep him. You'll tell me if there's anything useful to know. :thumbsu:
showdownhero
11 Jun 2007, 22:10
For goodness sake, people.
Attack the opinions of the man all you want. They are in the public domain. They are fair game, open for criticism or agreement.
Just like my opinions, just like anyone else on here.
Don't attack the man. It's lower than low. It's pathetic.
How about his constant unprovoked personal attacks on our coaching staff, administrators, players and board members ... his inferiority complex is very sad and disturbing.
James23
13 Jun 2007, 14:53
i noticed this week ruccis not wearing his pretty cooking hat in his roast.. maybe he looked in this thread and realised how stupid he looks :D
ams4crows
13 Jun 2007, 20:38
He's a tool of the higgest order just ignore him and he'll go away and find somebody else to pick on!
Crow-mo
13 Jun 2007, 20:57
I guess the campaign for whale gay rights has called John away again.
passamore
14 Jun 2007, 19:14
I am still pinning my hopes in Triggy and Bill.
passamore
14 Jun 2007, 19:15
How about his constant unprovoked personal attacks on our coaching staff, administrators, players and board members ... his inferiority complex is very sad and disturbing.
He has been completely out of order.
showdownhero
15 Jun 2007, 03:03
He has been completely out of order.
You got that fax machine cooled down yet rooch ... can't wait till it starts running hot again with sightings of Andrew McLeod looking like Osama or perhaps Scott Thompson looking like George Dubbaya.
I guess the campaign for whale gay rights has called John away again.
Yes; that's exactly right, Crow-Mo.
How on earth did you know that?
Crow-mo
16 Jun 2007, 00:28
Yes; that's exactly right, Crow-Mo.
How on earth did you know that?
well you appeared sober in your original post, so I thought there must have been a higher calling ;)
brucetiki
22 Jun 2007, 20:35
Had a good laugh today reading Confidential about how Rucci got dunked repeatedly yesterday.
Had a good laugh today reading Confidential about how Rucci got dunked repeatedly yesterday.
I have to congratulate him on putting himself forward for the charity
Kudos to you Mickey :thumbsu:
relapse
25 Jun 2007, 14:43
Had a good laugh today reading Confidential about how Rucci got dunked repeatedly yesterday.
Damn I missed it, I would have brought a basketball along to ensure that I didnt miss.
brucetiki
27 Jun 2007, 16:14
Damn I missed it, I would have brought a basketball along to ensure that I didnt miss.
Wouldn't we all - and for charity too it would have been well worth it