PDA

View Full Version : Are the Dogs In The Fight? Article By Robert Walls....


dogupya
16 Jun 2007, 04:40
Are the Dogs in the fight?
Robert Walls | June 16, 2007

TONIGHT'S game in Darwin is crucial for the Western Bulldogs. Their opponent, Fremantle, sits one game behind the Dogs and is a keen rival for a final-eight position. In effect, tonight becomes an eight-point game for Rodney Eade's men: a win will give them an eight-point buffer over Fremantle, a loss and it's all square.

Opinions vary as to how well the Bulldogs are travelling. After winning a final last season, for the first time in eight years, most believed they were on track to be certain finalists in 2007 and many had them pencilled in with a top-four finish.

Even the Bulldog faithful are divided as to how their team sits. One talkback caller suggested the coach would be quietly chuckling to himself as the upside to the second half of the season was massive. Another commented the fact that they have the third-worst defence, behind Carlton and Richmond, and that if you allow the opposition to average more than 100 points a game, then you could forget about winning a premiership.

Even last week against the Brisbane Lions, the Dogs won but lost at the same time. They took home four points but couldn't kick a goal in the final quarter and lost quality players in Daniel Cross and Ryan Griffin to long-term injury. So what does the immediate future hold for a team that has set itself to break a 53-year premiership drought?

THE UPSIDE
THE RECO BOYS
Darcy may not be the ruckman he once was, but he is a fine leader and will help develop Will Minson and Peter Street as ruckmen while he consolidates as the effective tall forward the Dogs desperately need.

Murphy is, in my opinion, the Bulldogs' best player. It has been a slow return for him.He has averaged only 11 disposals and one goal a game. From here on, he will go close to doubling those figures, and what a difference that will make.

Hahn has played five games for an average of eight touches. He, too, will double his output and add grunt to a team that needs as much as it can get.

THE RECRUITJason Akermanis is the man, but has he delivered? I don't think so. The Dogs got him to provide a touch of magic that would get them over the line in the four to five down-to-the-wire games they reckoned they would play this year. He has done it once this season, against Melbourne in round seven. He needs to deliver more.

TALL DEFENDERS
The Doggies are delighted with the development of three tall, skinny young defenders in Cameron Wight, Tom Williams and "Spida's" young brother, Andrejs Everitt.

Wight has been a regular in 2007, Williams has just come into the team and Everitt is an emergency for tonight's game. All are shaping up as excellent long-term prospects, in positions where they are sorely needed.

YOUNG IMPROVERS
Shaun Higgins played only five games last year before fracturing his elbow. This season, he has not missed a game and with 17 goals is the third-highest goalkicker. He is on track to be a star.

Dylan Addison tasted two games in 2006, now he is a regular. A tough tackler with a strong appetite for the contest, he is another example of the coach adding much-needed grunt.

Jarrod Harbrow is one to watch. A speedy ball carrier who wins contests, he is another example of a touch of toughness being added to the mix.

MATTHEW BOYD
Boyd is a low-key Bulldog who has come off a rookie list to earn a senior position. It's always been a struggle for the 24-year-old. Tonight will be his 80th game, but Bulldog fans know the tough tagger has gone up another notch. He always has led the way with tackles and hard-ball gets, and has become a quality playmaker in his own right.

THE VETERAN
Chris Grant is yet to play a senior game but he's not far off. Because he can play at either end of the ground, Grant will provide the coach with terrific options as September nears.

THE DOWNSIDE
DEFENCE
MARKS INSIDE 50
Geelong, Sydney, Collingwood and Essendon are the top four teams for marks inside 50 because they all have quality power forwards. The Bulldogs rank 16th because they don't have a quality tall forward doing the job. Maybe Darcy or Grant can improve that situation.

CLEARANCES
The Dogs rank 12th for clearances. Their A-graders are Adam Cooney (45), Scott West (43) and Boyd (40). What is needed is for the B-graders to lift in close. Nathan Eagleton (21), Daniel Giansiracusa (18), Akermanis (11) and Hahn (4) need to contribute a lot more.

BIG SCALPS ARE NEEDED
After tonight's game, the Dogs have a terrific run, with eight games out of the next 10 to be played at Telstra Dome. They need to have wins over Geelong and West Coast at the Dome and an away win against Adelaide to gain confidence and credibility come September.

It's not just the defender, it's the forwards and midfield, too, who don't lock down the opposition when they take, or look like taking, possession of the ball. End result, the Dogs too often get big scores kicked against them. The spoiling technique of the defensive six leaves much to be desired, causing Jordan McMahon to lose his spot in the side two weeks ago.Luke Darcy, Robert Murphy and Mitch Hahn are returning to senior football after knee reconstructions. It takes time and adjustments to build the strength and confidence to get back to your best. All three will have better second-half seasons.

Go_Dogs
16 Jun 2007, 10:56
Not a bad effort by Wallsy.

scooter600x
16 Jun 2007, 11:01
cliches, gross generalisations and the bleedin' obvious.

Lightening McQueen
16 Jun 2007, 11:20
cliches, gross generalisations and the bleedin' obvious.
I'm guessing here but me thinks you don't like Walls.

Don't forget this article is directed at the footy public not Die Hard fans like yourself who know all our flaws.

scooter600x
16 Jun 2007, 11:36
I'm guessing here but me thinks you don't like Walls.

Don't forget this article is directed at the footy public not Die Hard fans like yourself who know all our flaws.

I don't particularily like Walls, but there is nothing in that article that hasn't been posted here on BigFooty time and time again.

For someone who is well paid to give us an insight into his wisdom regarding football (apparently he's an ex-coach, you know), he falls well short of what I would expect.

topdog
16 Jun 2007, 12:00
I like Robert Walls, he says it the way he see's it.

He has continually pushed for Darcy to be played as a permanent forward and to play Street and Minson in ruck. Alot of people on this board disagree.

The Coon Dog
16 Jun 2007, 12:03
Does Robert Walls ever write positive articles? Everyone I seem to read of his, he's tipping a bucket on someone. Reminds me of Trevor Grant in the Herald Sun.

topdog
16 Jun 2007, 12:31
Does Robert Walls ever write positive articles? Everyone I seem to read of his, he's tipping a bucket on someone. Reminds me of Trevor Grant in the Herald Sun.

I thought that the article he wrote was positive and constructive. He said we need to improve and really believed we will in the second part of the season. If you want to read positive articles on the bulldogs, read the Mark Stevens articles in the Sun.

Aquamarinejewel
16 Jun 2007, 14:45
Here is the link to the article that was missed by dogupya, when posting articles it is very important to post the link from where the article was obtained.

Are the Dogs in the fight? (http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/are-the-dogs-in-the-fight/2007/06/15/1181414549901.html)

Aquamarinejewel
16 Jun 2007, 14:54
I thought that the article he wrote was positive and constructive. He said we need to improve and really believed we will in the second part of the season.

I also liked the article whilst a lot of people aren't big "Walls" fans I quite enjoy reading his articles. He is only writing how he sees things and a lot of what he has written in this article makes sense.

kookadog
16 Jun 2007, 15:43
He didn't answer the question at all, just asked one and left it open.

Curly5
16 Jun 2007, 16:15
He didn't answer the question at all, just asked one and left it open.

I think he meant that we will find out tonight in Darwin. I can't help agreeing with him.

borgy
16 Jun 2007, 19:39
He didn't answer the question at all, just asked one and left it open.
Rhetorical question maybe.

W W Biscuit
16 Jun 2007, 23:43
I think that Johnno might have something to say about Murph being our best player! ;)

tassiedog
16 Jun 2007, 23:55
It is a winter hobby for football followers to bag the media. Being a football writer/commentator is a highly paid position. I assume the people who bag the media are earning more money otherwise they would (with all their tallent) be in the media.

Get real people!

The Coon Dog
17 Jun 2007, 00:16
It is a winter hobby for football followers to bag the media. Being a football writer/commentator is a highly paid position. I assume the people who bag the media are earning more money otherwise they would (with all their tallent) be in the media.

Get real people!

What the heck are you waffling on about?

The salary someone earns (be they journalist or BF poster) is irrelevant when it comes to having an opinion. I couldn't care less what any journo earns. It's their comments I care to read about & just because they earn more than me, or anyone on BF, doesn't mean they're always right or we have to concur with them.

I stand by my comment that I reckon Robert Walls writes far too many negative articles, continually bucketing players/coaches/teams then he has the gall to claim some credit if there's a turnaround in fluctuations or form.

Pembleton
17 Jun 2007, 00:22
It is a winter hobby for football followers to bag the media. Being a football writer/commentator is a highly paid position. I assume the people who bag the media are earning more money otherwise they would (with all their tallent) be in the media.

Get real people!

I think some of the media bashing that happens on this board is stupid, but your reasoning is very dodgy. If you think some of the criticism levelled at Walls is unfair you should mention where people are getting it wrong, but how much money he makes, or how good anyone criticising him would be at the job themselves, has nothing to do with it, at all. You assume Walls has his job based purely on his ability. Don't you think the paper's desire to have a high profile name in the by line has anything to do with it?

ErnieSigley
17 Jun 2007, 09:39
The stupidist thing about Walls article is that he lists Cameron Wight as regular and important member of the team when he was dropped 2 weeks back and after his performance yesterday at Werribee won't be back soon.

beyondthevalley ofthedogs
17 Jun 2007, 10:00
The Robert Walls reverse curse in full effect. He bags a club - they win. Very disappointed he didn't go the whole hog and tip a REAL bucket over us. That would have guaranteed a Top 4 finish for us.

I thought the article was OK though not really "news" for diehard Doggies fans. For those who want to avoid negative articles (and he does write the odd friendly article which usually has a massive negative effect on the player's/club's form) stick to reading the Bulldogs magazine