Hille out [Archive]

jhgoat

18 Jun 2007, 15:11

should contest, cornes was turning which made hille hit him on the head rather than hitting him in the body.

thats what they should say, but we all know he was trying to kill him

Boris_Bewick

18 Jun 2007, 15:52

Jason Laycock. Your time is now

BomberAce7

18 Jun 2007, 16:21

Jason Laycock. Your time is now

Yes ya Damn Right! This is his biggest test so far he may play a only hand in the ruck against White if Ryder plays in defence. Would Sheeds pull a surprise and select Scott Gumbleton as a back up ruckman for Laycock???

HirdforPM

18 Jun 2007, 16:27

i though laycock rucked ok the other day

BomberAce7

18 Jun 2007, 17:43

i though laycock rucked ok the other day

Yes he has the last 2 weeks Jason has been good!

Bomberz_pacers07

18 Jun 2007, 17:45

wilson only got a reprimand for his hit on slatts.....i would have thought his was worse than hilles.

HirdforPM

18 Jun 2007, 17:47

how the **** can hille get a week and wilson gets off, this is a ****ing joke

sen entertainment bloke

18 Jun 2007, 17:47

i though laycock rucked ok the other day

Jumps to early at centre bounces and ball ups. Still some good palm work, mainly at throw ins..

havoc_planet

18 Jun 2007, 17:51

Bring in Mckinnon and Kep's
:thumbsu:
Haha Just kiddin

High Ryder

18 Jun 2007, 17:52

how the **** can hille get a week and wilson gets off, this is a ****ing joke
Hille had previous points but i agree... Wilson's hit was terrible and he gets off?

wazzabp

18 Jun 2007, 17:53

how the **** can hille get a week and wilson gets off, this is a ****ing joke

Exactly, Wilson should have got a week also.

BomberAce7

18 Jun 2007, 17:56

how the **** can hille get a week and wilson gets off, this is a ****ing joke

Damn Straight its a joke!!! Henry already disposed of the ball and gets clobbered to the face! Once again inconsistencies at the tribunal!!!

High Ryder

18 Jun 2007, 17:56

Wilson should of gotten a month.

HirdforPM

18 Jun 2007, 18:09

eagleton got 2 and that tarrant got off also, one rule for one another for another

donsman4eva

18 Jun 2007, 18:47

eagleton got 2 and that tarrant got off also, one rule for one another for another
Eagletons hit was far worse than Tarrants if youve seen the vision.

And as for Wilson, his hit was crude and totally behind play. Ridiculous that he gets off.

super_wog

18 Jun 2007, 18:57

Bring in Mckinnon and Kep's
:thumbsu:
Haha Just kiddin please dont mention keps name again please. the only time we should hear his name again should be during trade time later on this years.

donsman4eva

18 Jun 2007, 19:01

Kep will more than likely play against Melb IMO. He deserves it too, hes been killing them in the VFL.

danzan22

18 Jun 2007, 19:01

please dont mention keps name again please. the only time we should hear his name again should be during trade time later on this years.
If Hille doesn't play you will see his name in the line up and im all for him coming back as a foward/ruck.

Keps has been excellent at VFL level as a foward recently and deserves a call up for the work he has put in, hopefully he doesn't get named in the backline.

RED AND BLACK SOLDIER

18 Jun 2007, 19:23

Well it going to be very hard for us to win against Melbourne now. He's one of our most important players!!!

BomberAce7

18 Jun 2007, 19:24

please dont mention keps name again please. the only time we should hear his name again should be during trade time later on this years.

Agree Agree Agree!!!!

donsman4eva

18 Jun 2007, 19:38

Well it going to be very hard for us to win against Melbourne now. He's one of our most important players!!!
IMO, Ryder will play in the ruck for a majority of the game anyway, he has the engine to go with Jeff White all day. Laycock might still be used as a backup against Paul Johnson, who Laycock should be able to account for. It will definitly be interesting in the ruck.

RED AND BLACK SOLDIER

18 Jun 2007, 21:52

IMO, Ryder will play in the ruck for a majority of the game anyway, he has the engine to go with Jeff White all day. Laycock might still be used as a backup against Paul Johnson, who Laycock should be able to account for. It will definitly be interesting in the ruck.
That is similar to what happened last time Hille was out wasn't it? And what was the outcome of the game?

Longy413

18 Jun 2007, 22:02

IMO, Ryder will play in the ruck for a majority of the game anyway, he has the engine to go with Jeff White all day.

I don't think he does have the engine to go with him.
Not at all.

The break will freshen him up, but he's looked very tired the last couple of weeks. What he's done thus far this season has been a big ask.

bombersno1

18 Jun 2007, 22:04

Can Ryder ruck for half the game? Serious question as we are next to no chance with Laycock and Bradley as the ruck combo.

Bomberz_pacers07

18 Jun 2007, 22:05

I dont think we need a tall (bradely, Johns) replacment for Hille. Isn't Neits meant to be out for a few..?? this would free ryder up and we would not need him in the backline and could play ruck for the day.
If anything bring in a fast player for hille.

Crave

18 Jun 2007, 22:08

I actually wouldnt mind if Lucas was brought down back and Johns brought in to expose their fragile backline. the downside to that would be at the expense of bringing in some more fresh legs into the side for rotational purposes.

Disto

19 Jun 2007, 14:21

Any news on the club contesting the Hille suspension.
He can't get rubbed out for anymore than 1 even if they do contest it.
I really hope they did lodge it by 11am as there was nothing in it, even kept his arm tucked in.

Cheers
Disto

donsman4eva

19 Jun 2007, 14:25

I don't think he does have the engine to go with him.
Not at all.

The break will freshen him up, but he's looked very tired the last couple of weeks. What he's done thus far this season has been a big ask.
Well he will be bale to go with White better than Laycock, who is our other option, unless Bradley comes in and rucks, which I would hate to see, or maybe Bolton could ruck, which is stupid IMO.

The Toecutter

19 Jun 2007, 19:01

Kep will more than likely play against Melb IMO. He deserves it too, hes been killing them in the VFL.There must be a huge difference in standard between the VFL and the AFL is kepler is killing them. I agree with the Super Wog the only time i wanna hear of his name is during trade week. The same for Courtney Johns (the Sunday Herald-Sun said Brisbane could use him) lets trade the two of them for a couple of draft picks and maybe a back-up ruckman.:thumbsu:

danzan22

19 Jun 2007, 19:13

There must be a huge difference in standard between the VFL and the AFL is kepler is killing them. I agree with the Super Wog the only time i wanna hear of his name is during trade week. The same for Courtney Johns (the Sunday Herald-Sun said Brisbane could use him) lets trade the two of them for a couple of draft picks and maybe a back-up ruckman.:thumbsu:
Also keps has rarely been played in the right position when playing for Essendon.

Last year against Brisbane he was playd on the HFF and dominated with 4 goals.

donsman4eva

19 Jun 2007, 20:34

There must be a huge difference in standard between the VFL and the AFL is kepler is killing them. I agree with the Super Wog the only time i wanna hear of his name is during trade week. The same for Courtney Johns (the Sunday Herald-Sun said Brisbane could use him) lets trade the two of them for a couple of draft picks and maybe a back-up ruckman.:thumbsu:
Well if you dont gauge the form of players from the VFL, then what criteria do you use for elevations? :confused:

dodgyJim

19 Jun 2007, 20:49

I'm all for giving Keps another run, but only in the fwd line. He is too indecisive in defence or when he needs to make a quick decision.

He takes an OK mark, so let's sit him inthe fwd pocket and bomb them in while he gets the 3rd or even 4th defender. He doesn't need to get all unstuck trying to work out where to kick it, just take the mark and go back and kick the ball.

How many times have we seen him piss around with the ball while trying to decide what to do and turn it over. We will soon know if he is going to be any good in the AFL or if he will copy Joel Reynolds and just be a good VFL player.

The Toecutter

19 Jun 2007, 23:05

How many times have we seen him piss around with the ball while trying to decide what to do and turn it over. We will soon know if he is going to be any good in the AFL or if he will copy Joel Reynolds and just be a good VFL player.I think its gonna be more of the latter than the former in Kepler's case unfortunately:)