PDA

View Full Version : Are we truely clean now?


Prem87
18 Oct 2007, 01:02
Now with Cousins & Chick gone, is it safe to say that more of problems are gone now? Shouldnt parents not feel worried anymore about sending their sons away now?

Any chance Judd will come back now :p

Plugga
18 Oct 2007, 01:06
u don't know your club very well do u?

Special Agent
18 Oct 2007, 01:09
How do we know if any AFL club is truely clean?

Goldenblue
18 Oct 2007, 01:33
u don't know your club very well do u?

Well spill the beans then Mr. Information.....

TheBigUnit
18 Oct 2007, 01:38
How do we know if any AFL club is truly clean?

Exactly.

greennick
18 Oct 2007, 01:40
Nope we are not, but we are cleaner than that club in Melbourne at least. We have less users I know of ours than I know of theirs at least. That's a start! :thumbsu:

We'll never be totally clean, just hopefully it doesn't get out of control again. No club will ever be totally clean.

Underdog
18 Oct 2007, 01:46
Well spill the beans then Mr. Information.....

What would be the point? I know certain things...as do others.

But letting it get around or posting on this board will never be positive and only exposes you and the board to legal action and moderator discipline

surely as a mod you know this...

Rambo Stallone
18 Oct 2007, 01:55
Does everyone agree starting from next year,doesn't matter what club or how good the player it is after 1 Strike your out,no 3 Strikes. I feel 1 strike o.k you stuffed up,we give your a chance,**** up again your gone.The AFL is to weak.

Wing Commander
18 Oct 2007, 01:59
Caro wrote this...

"Other players, including two of its best performers in 2007, have reportedly been living it up on the dark side in the weeks after the gripping loss to Collingwood and the club must now look seriously at eradicating the place of all the cancers that have crept through it over the years."

Who do you think they are?

West Coast Premiers 2006
18 Oct 2007, 02:09
I don't think any club is clean. The sad fact of the matter is these young men have a great deal of free time and add to the huge salaries. Also most high level sports love adrenalin so maybe they think drugs are the next step for new kicks.

Underdog
18 Oct 2007, 02:14
Does everyone agree starting from next year,doesn't matter what club or how good the player it is after 1 Strike your out,no 3 Strikes. I feel 1 strike o.k you stuffed,we give your a chance,**** up again your gone.The AFL is to weak.

the club is not informed to take action after 1 strike

Caro wrote this...

"Other players, including two of its best performers in 2007, have reportedly been living it up on the dark side in the weeks after the gripping loss to Collingwood and the club must now look seriously at eradicating the place of all the cancers that have crept through it over the years."

Who do you think they are?

Caroline is the gossip queen. Speculating is pointless

GoOsH
18 Oct 2007, 03:00
no club is truely clean, it's a lot like the war on drugs as a whole, you keep fighting it but I don't think you'll ever beat it. There is no way you can get 40 odd guys aged 18-35 with massive disposable salaries and expect none of them to take drugs on their annual leave, it'd be great if they didn't but it'll never happen IMO.

Kempie
18 Oct 2007, 03:36
no club is truey clean, it's a lot like the war on drugs as a whole, you keep fighting it but I don't think you'll ever beat it.

The legendary 'War on Drugs', instituted by President Regan resulted only in making a lot of drug producers and suppliers enormously richer. And making a lot of B-Grade actors careers out of crap. Sympathy thing ?

Likewise the 'War on Terror'. Opium output in Afghanistan is peaking, and the Taliban are gaining lost ground.

Morons that gasbag on about 'zero-tolerance' don't have a clue.

There is no way you can get 40 odd guys aged 18-35 with massive disposable salaries and expect none of them to take drugs on their annual leave, it'd be great if they didn't but it'll never happen IMO.

Even without the massive disposable salary, "18-35 yr olds" are still going to do this sort of thing.

Put it down to inevitable wastage, which is what society has to do, and has always done. Some people are going to screw-up.

C'est La Vie. Such is Life. Life's a Shit-Sandwich.

Move on, but out of respect, try not to trample over the bodies.

NGHAWK
18 Oct 2007, 07:34
Nope we are not, but we are cleaner than that club in Melbourne at least. We have less users I know of ours than I know of theirs at least. That's a start! :thumbsu:

We'll never be totally clean, just hopefully it doesn't get out of control again. No club will ever be totally clean.


:cool:



I guess that club would be Carlton now......:D

spEKTre
18 Oct 2007, 09:44
Mandatory Naltrexone injections for all AFL players ?? every second person on the street is taking something these days so to expect AFL players to be some kind of shining light of abstanance is asking a bit much.

cambo39
18 Oct 2007, 13:20
do you understand that the players you are referring to were tested under the ALF policy and their subsequent medical treatment was the consequence of the prescribed policy. The fact they have remained anonymous is due the the confidential nature of medical records. What would your reaction be to Cousin's medical records from the USA rehab centre being sold to the Austalian media. The legal injunction taken out to prohibit pulication of the records was taken out by the Director of the Rehab Clinic.
Take a deep breath and think about this.
If Cousins had been tested and found positive under the current AFL policy his situation may not have plumbed to the depths it has.