View Full Version : Matthew Primus rule:which North players would you take...
TheGeneral
30th October 2007, 22:19
because they didn't want to move to Queensland like Matthew Primus.
Or if the Roos went out of business.
Lachlan Hansen.
David Hale - his mum hates the AFL and he'd want to stick it up the AFL.
Hamish McIntosh - gun ruckman who has Matthew Primus written all over him.
Wells - but he'd probably return home and play for the Dockers or Eagles.
Daniel Harris.
Jesse Smith - he could do a Marc Murphy and sign with Carlton.
7zark7
30th October 2007, 22:21
How unusual...a Carlton supporter talking of how they will pillage another teams players.
Greg Williams/Chris Judd board
TheGeneral
30th October 2007, 22:28
How unusual...a Carlton supporter talking of how they will pillage another teams players.
Scott Camporeale and Mal Michael board.
Why would anyone want to join your crap football club when Knights would be their coach?
Especially after you treated Bradley like dirt and delisted him out of spite. :thumbsd:
I wouldn't take Swallow, he can't kick for shit.
ManWithNoName
30th October 2007, 22:33
Scott Camporeale and Mal Michael board.
Why would anyone want to join your crap football club when Knights would be their coach?
Especially after you treated Bradley like dirt and delisted him out of spite. :thumbsd:
I wouldn't take Swallow, he can't kick for shit.
Out of spite? Riiiiiiiiiiiight.
SweetLeftFoot
31st October 2007, 00:16
You cheating parasites will get nothing.
After tomorrow, when we begin our march back to full strength, I fully hope North begins lobbying the AFL to have your criminal President removed, and for your 8m interest free loan to be revoked.
7zark7
31st October 2007, 08:32
Scott Camporeale and Mal Michael board.
Why would anyone want to join your crap football club when Knights would be their coach?
Especially after you treated Bradley like dirt and delisted him out of spite. :thumbsd:
I wouldn't take Swallow, he can't kick for shit.
Yeah...Campo and Michael equate to Williams (brownlow) and Judd (Brownlow) :rolleyes:
Bradley...Spite??? :confused:
You are a disillusioned lot.
The Chad
31st October 2007, 08:47
You cheating parasites will get nothing.
After tomorrow, when we begin our march back to full strength, I fully hope North begins lobbying the AFL to have your criminal President removed, and for your 8m interest free loan to be revoked.
see the problem here is kangaroos football club relocating
not what kangaroos football club fans are trying to have imposed on other clubs
surely your own mob's fight is worth worrying about first and putting the cart before the horse with richard pratt is somewhat irrelevant to your situation
MarkT
31st October 2007, 09:34
If it came to it I’d settle for McIntosch. That will do me. After that Smith. Harvey for an improved chance of immediate success. The ruckman is who I want though. Couldn’t care much about the rest because they won’t add nearly as much to Collingwood’s list. Lots of players that could make a marginal improvement. McIntosch is what we need though.
Harris would be handy. Wells I am undecided about. Very frustrating player.
NorthBhoy
31st October 2007, 09:47
If it came to it I’d settle for McIntosch. That will do me. After that Smith. Harvey for an improved chance of immediate success. The ruckman is who I want though. Couldn’t care much about the rest because they won’t add nearly as much to Collingwood’s list. Lots of players that could make a marginal improvement. McIntosch is what we need though.
Harris would be handy. Wells I am undecided about. Very frustrating player.
That's it? We finished higher than you, and you name two blokes.
Unless you now support Geelong, that's a load of old toss!!
magpie_militia
31st October 2007, 09:55
That's it? We finished higher than you, and you name two blokes.
Unless you now support Geelong, that's a load of old toss!!
Two blokes that would make a marked difference to our team.
Norths' list is very similar to the Pies' list when I think about it. A lot of good players that work hard for each other, with very few genuine stars.
David Villa
31st October 2007, 10:15
That's it? We finished higher than you, and you name two blokes.
Unless you now support Geelong, that's a load of old toss!!
Difference is though you knob, collingwood didnt get thrashed by 100 points by Geelong or Port. Your club was an embarrassment in the finals and it truly showed that you didnt belong there. Funny you rate your bunch of hacks better than a side who got within a kick of beating Geelong and making the GF.
Maybe you'll do better on the GC :D
Hotel 6
31st October 2007, 10:18
I wouldn't take Swallow, he can't kick for shit.
Yeah, that goal he kicked from outside the 50 to beat Melbourne by a few points was a shocker :eek:.
His action may not be the best but his kicking is effective
Waverley73
31st October 2007, 10:24
Difference is though you knob, collingwood didnt get thrashed by 100 points by Geelong or Port. Your club was an embarrassment in the finals and it truly showed that you didnt belong there. Funny you rate your bunch of hacks better than a side who got within a kick of beating Geelong and making the GF.
Maybe you'll do better on the GC :D
The world has truely gone mad.. A Carlton supporter giving props to Collingwood...
Roos4eva
31st October 2007, 11:34
Your club was an embarrassment in the finals and it truly showed that you didnt belong there.
Tell that to Hawthorn supporters. Oh wait, they'll still argue they were the better team, my apologies.
The Old Dark Navy's
31st October 2007, 11:39
You cheating parasites will get nothing.
After tomorrow, when we begin our march back to full strength, I fully hope North begins lobbying the AFL to have your criminal President removed, and for your 8m interest free loan to be revoked.I have discovered you have been running all over the place quoting this $8m loan. It was a $1.5m loan and $8m was our whole debt, much of it we still have.
It is getting frustrating seeing you retell something you probably misread somewhere else.
MarkT
31st October 2007, 12:57
That's it? We finished higher than you, and you name two blokes.
Unless you now support Geelong, that's a load of old toss!!Settle down we aren’t merging just looking at the list and cherry picking.
As I said lots of player who could make marginal improvement. Not interested in any of your forwards or backs and don’t try and sell me on wells. I’ve jumped off that bandwagon.
Who else would you drop into Collingwood to make a marked difference? Maybe Harris when Burns retires? Harvey is gun but old. Simpson is what we already have although a better tagger. Who else?
Pres
31st October 2007, 20:52
The problem with these main board sub forums is that a lot of Bay 13 suitable threads such as this one never make it to Bay 13.